Skip to main content

The Way Forward - Leading A Virtuous Life - Part 6 Theological Virtues

Image
By
+
JMJ

We have now reached the pinnacle of the virtues - the Theological Virtues. Without the theological virtues, particularly Faith, salvation is impossible.






Theological virtues


All virtues have as their final goal or end to dispose souls to acts conducive to their true happiness. The happiness, has two facets: natural (attainable via natural powers), supernatural (exceeds natural powers). Since, natural means of human action are inadequate to attain a supernatural end, it is necessary that a person be endowed with supernatural powers to enable the attainment of that final destiny. These supernatural principles (powers) are the theological virtues.

They are called theological:

  • because they have God for their immediate and proper object;
  • because they are Divinely infused;
  • because they are known only through Divine Revelation.
There a three theological virtues: faith, hope, and charity.

Faith is an infused virtue, perfecting the intellect by a supernatural light, providing the power to, under a supernatural movement of the will, assent firmly to the supernatural truths of Revelation. This assent is performed not based on intrinsic evidence, but solely on the grounds of the infallible authority of God who has revealed these truths. As natural happiness can be understood and sought by knowledge attained by the natural light of reason, to attain our supernatural destiny our intellect must be illumined by certain supernatural principles, namely, Divinely revealed truths.

Hope is the virtue by which the will is perfected to attain our supernatural end. Generally it defined as a Divinely infused virtue, by which we trust, with an unshaken confidence grounded on the Divine assistance, to attain life everlasting.

Charity creates a spiritual union or conformity, by which the soul is united to God, the sovereign Good. Charity, then, is that theological virtue, by which God, our ultimate end, known by supernatural light, is loved by reason of His own intrinsic goodness or amiability, and our neighbour loved on account of God. This virtue is different from faith, as it regards God not under the aspect of truth but of good. It is different from hope inasmuch as it regards God not as our good precisely (nobis bonum), but as good in Himself (in se bonum). With regard to the love of our neighbor, it falls within the theological virtue of charity in so far as its motive is the supernatural love of God, and it is thus distinguished from mere natural affection.

Charity is the most excellent of the Theological Virtues. Faith and hope, involving as they do a certain imperfection, namely, obscurity of light and absence of possession, will cease with this life, but charity involving no essential defect will last forever. Moreover, while charity excludes all mortal sin, faith and hope are compatible with grievous sin; but as such they are only imperfect virtues; it is only when informed and vivified by charity that their acts are meritorious of eternal life.

Application in Today's World

Obviously all three theological virtues are necessary to survive and thrive in this crisis of the Church.
If a Traditional Catholic looses the Faith, they fall further than any heretic since they have been granted so much more.

However, I think that Charity and in particular love of neighbour, is particularly challenged in this crisis.  Why? Because as a Traditional Catholic, we are attacked by those who are not Traditional. It is in this case that our Love of God and neighbour is tested.  It is in this case that I've noticed some Traditionalists, under the continual onslaught from their Catholic brethren, turn bitter, losing that sense that their attackers are loved by God and deserve their love for God's sake.

Love thine enemy is still a command.

P^3

Further Reading


Reference

APA citation. Waldron, M.A. (1912). Virtue. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved July 27, 2015 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15472a.htm
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Episcopal Consecrations of 1988, 1991 and 2015 - Some Perspectives

By
+ JMJ In defense of the recent consecration of Fr. Faure by Bishop Williamson, some have argued that the 1991 consecration of Bishop Rangel (RIP) by the Bishops of the SSPX present an equivalent standard of action and principles.  From this they conclude that the SSPX's condemnation of Bishop Williamson's action is flawed as the principles of the 1991 consecration and that of 2015 are equivalent.
2 comments
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

America Magazine: Why liturgy is not a space for self-expression

By
 + JMJ Introduction I subscribed to Jesuit Review America Magazine in order to improve my perspective on the crisis of the Church. At first, I found that I had a hard time reading through the articles that caught my attention.  Actually, at best, I didn't get further than a few sentences.  Mostly due to demands on what time I have left on this Good Earth. Then a title caught my eye in a latest article ... someone is saying that the Liturgy is not a space for self-expression.  Then there's the Performative Piety?  What does this mean? What is Performative Piety? I had a sense that "Performative Piety" is the practice of making external acts of piety to be seen by others and Matthew 6:1 (link) confirms this thought. Let's break down the Knox translation: Be sure you do not perform your acts of piety before men ,  for them to watch ;  if you do that,  you have no title to a reward from your Father who is in heaven. If you stopped after the first ph...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPXasia Timeline

By
+ JMJ The SSPXasia website has an excellent compilation of documents.  One day I may try to fuse it with my own chronicle project. P^3 https://sspxasia.com/Documents/Archbishop-Lefebvre/Archbishop_Lefebvre_and_the_Vatican/Part_I/ (1987) June 29: Ordination Sermon of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre July 8: Letter of Archbishop Lefebvre to Cardinal Ratzinger July 28: Letter of Cardinal Ratzinger to Archbishop Lefebvre October 1: Letter of Archbishop Lefebvre to Cardinal Ratzinger October ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

By
 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...
Post a Comment
Read more