Skip to main content

The Way Forward - Leading A Virtuous Life - Part 6 Theological Virtues

Image
By
+
JMJ

We have now reached the pinnacle of the virtues - the Theological Virtues. Without the theological virtues, particularly Faith, salvation is impossible.






Theological virtues


All virtues have as their final goal or end to dispose souls to acts conducive to their true happiness. The happiness, has two facets: natural (attainable via natural powers), supernatural (exceeds natural powers). Since, natural means of human action are inadequate to attain a supernatural end, it is necessary that a person be endowed with supernatural powers to enable the attainment of that final destiny. These supernatural principles (powers) are the theological virtues.

They are called theological:

  • because they have God for their immediate and proper object;
  • because they are Divinely infused;
  • because they are known only through Divine Revelation.
There a three theological virtues: faith, hope, and charity.

Faith is an infused virtue, perfecting the intellect by a supernatural light, providing the power to, under a supernatural movement of the will, assent firmly to the supernatural truths of Revelation. This assent is performed not based on intrinsic evidence, but solely on the grounds of the infallible authority of God who has revealed these truths. As natural happiness can be understood and sought by knowledge attained by the natural light of reason, to attain our supernatural destiny our intellect must be illumined by certain supernatural principles, namely, Divinely revealed truths.

Hope is the virtue by which the will is perfected to attain our supernatural end. Generally it defined as a Divinely infused virtue, by which we trust, with an unshaken confidence grounded on the Divine assistance, to attain life everlasting.

Charity creates a spiritual union or conformity, by which the soul is united to God, the sovereign Good. Charity, then, is that theological virtue, by which God, our ultimate end, known by supernatural light, is loved by reason of His own intrinsic goodness or amiability, and our neighbour loved on account of God. This virtue is different from faith, as it regards God not under the aspect of truth but of good. It is different from hope inasmuch as it regards God not as our good precisely (nobis bonum), but as good in Himself (in se bonum). With regard to the love of our neighbor, it falls within the theological virtue of charity in so far as its motive is the supernatural love of God, and it is thus distinguished from mere natural affection.

Charity is the most excellent of the Theological Virtues. Faith and hope, involving as they do a certain imperfection, namely, obscurity of light and absence of possession, will cease with this life, but charity involving no essential defect will last forever. Moreover, while charity excludes all mortal sin, faith and hope are compatible with grievous sin; but as such they are only imperfect virtues; it is only when informed and vivified by charity that their acts are meritorious of eternal life.

Application in Today's World

Obviously all three theological virtues are necessary to survive and thrive in this crisis of the Church.
If a Traditional Catholic looses the Faith, they fall further than any heretic since they have been granted so much more.

However, I think that Charity and in particular love of neighbour, is particularly challenged in this crisis.  Why? Because as a Traditional Catholic, we are attacked by those who are not Traditional. It is in this case that our Love of God and neighbour is tested.  It is in this case that I've noticed some Traditionalists, under the continual onslaught from their Catholic brethren, turn bitter, losing that sense that their attackers are loved by God and deserve their love for God's sake.

Love thine enemy is still a command.

P^3

Further Reading


Reference

APA citation. Waldron, M.A. (1912). Virtue. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved July 27, 2015 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15472a.htm
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law – Part I: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ Is a Traditional Catholic who abandons the doctrine of the Catholic Church - are they truly worthy of the name of Catholic? This is why it is important to understand Catholic Doctrine so we don't knowingly abandon it! This is a lecture provided by Dr. Lamont that touches on the topic of obedience. Obedience is one key to emerging from this crisis. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May 2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law – Part I By John Lamont (Lecture given in New York on Friday, April 4, 2014)
Post a Comment
Read more

Schism

By
There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more