Skip to main content

A Look Back: Traditionalists, Conservatives and Sedevacantists - Which are the true Catholics? - Bishop Williamson of the 90's


+
JMJ


I refer to this pamphlet so often (mostly in discussions with resistors), I thought it deserved its own posting.  I have reproduced the text so that it will be easily cut and pasted.


Traditionalists, Conservatives, Sedevacantists - Which are the true Catholics?


Catholics Amidst Confusion

  • Those opinions or judgements are true which correspond not to inner wishes but to the outer reality.  The chart within lays out the five main positions taken by Catholics on the major problems within the Church tody. Which position corresponds to reality?  That will be the Catholic position.
  • The will of Our Lord for the reality of His Church is that on the one hand it must endure unchanging to the end of the world, on the other hand it must, to save souls, be firmly inserted in the flow of history in all times and places. While the error of liberalism to the left of the chart is characterized by its mania for change sweeping away all Catholic essentials, conversely  the trap of sedevacantism on the right is characterized by its so clinging to externals as to cut the Church out of the movement of the world.
  • Only Catholic Tradition corresponds correctly to the double reality of stability inserted in change. Even the moderate error (conservatism) is hopelessly destabilized by compromise with liberal principles, while the moderate version of sedevacantism still wishes to hide its head in Tridentine sand. But one may say that the age of the Council of Trent (not its dogmas) came to an end with Vatican II.
  • So the Traditional position is the Catholic position, as its fruitfulness proves (without Tradition there would be little or no conservatism or sedevacantism!). And this position would remain true, even if the Society of St. Pius X were not there to uphold it.  Reality governs people, not people reality.
Notes
  • On a variety of questions in the Catholic Church today opinions clash. However, the chart opposite shows that the chaos can be brought to order.
  • In the five vertical columns from far left (liberals) to far right (extreme sede-vacantists), a laid out the five main positions taken by Catholic on seven important questions in the Church today, from the New Mass (above) to Archbishop Lefebvre (below). Any given Catholic may hold opinions from more than one column, but generally the opinions down any one column hang together.
  • Similarly, if one reads across the chart, opinions on any one of the severn questions range from extreme left all in favour of change (liberals) to extreme right repudiating any change (extreme sede-vacantists), with all imaginable shades of opinion in between. But the rang of opinions is orderly.
  • This horizontal and vertical order underlying an apparent disarray of opinions reflects one reality confronting a disarray of Catholics. It is normal for opinions to scatter around a central object, like shots around a bulls-eye.
  • However, it is not being in the centre that makes the Traditional position true because there is no true comparison between liberalism, a world-engulfing error generating millions of disbelievers, and sedevacantis, an emotional reaction trapping handfuls of exasperated believers.
  • That what makes the Traditional position true? See over.





















Exaggerated Reaction to Error
SEDEVACANTISTS
e.g. Fragmented Society of St. Pius V




Error
Liberals
The Conciliar Church,
Aka The Newchurch, Novos Ordo
Compromise
Conservatives
eg. Society of St. Peter
Indult, Una Voce, etc
Truth
“Traditionalist”
e.g. Society of St. Pius X
And many kindres spirits
Moderate Extreme

1 The New Mass The New Mass in English is a great improvement ove rthe old (Tridentine) Mass in Latin The New Mass is not as good as the Old Mass, but priests can say it, or at least laity can attend it. The New Mass can be valid, can be valid, but it is so harmful to the Faith that priests should never say it, nor should laity ever attend it. The New Mass is so bad that one may doubt whether it can ever be validly celebrated. The New Mass is so bad that beyond question it can never be a valid Mass.

2 Church and World This is because the modern world is always moving forwards, so the Church must constantly move with the times. The modern world is not always truly moving forwards. If only we and the Church could go back to the 1950's! The modern world as such is built on anti-Catholic principles which had already far undermined the Church of teh 1950's. The modern world is not always truly moving forwards. If only we and the Church could go back to the 1950's. The modern world is not always truly moving forwards. If only we could go back to the Church of the 1900's or 1850's!

3 Renewal Thus by the 1960's, the Church needed a complete renewal. The old Church belongs in the dust-bin of history. Excessive renewal has caused a crisis in the Church, but one must always stay within its official structures. The crisis of “renewal” has become so grave in teh Church that to stay Catholic one may have to be “excommunicated”. The official Church and its leaders have gone so far in their false “renewal” that they may be ignored by Catholics. Today's seeming Catholic Church is in no way still Catholic. True Catholics must somehow elect their own Pope.

4 The 2nd Vatican Council Vatican II ushered in this renewal, it was a second Pentecost, inspired throughout by the Holy Ghost. Vatican II documents contain no error. All problems come from their misinterpretation after the Council. Vatican II was a legitimately convened Council, but its deliberately ambiguous documents opened doors wide to error. The documents of Vatican II are openly heretical. There is nothing worth salvaging from that Council. Vatican II was illegimate from the very beginning. It was not a Catholic Council in any way at all.

5 Pope John-Paul II Pope John-Paul II used to promote this renewal, but now he is a hide-bound conservative, holding it back. Pope John-Paul II is a traditionalist who is appointing conservative bishops and restoring the Church. Despite conservative appearances, Pope John-Paul II is in fact by his liberalism destroying the Church. But he is still Pope. Pope John-Paul II is so far from being Catholic that one may seriously doubt whether he is Pope at all. Pope John-Paul II is such a heretic that there is no way he can be Pope. The See of Peter is vacant.

6 Obedience Obedience to Church superiors imposing the renewal is an absolute, the one thing necessary to be a Catholic. Superiors imposing the liberal renewal are not good, but Catholic obedience requires that one stay with Rome. Liberal Church superiors must be respected as superiors, but as liberals, when they destroy the Faith, they must not be obeyed. Present Church superiors have virtually forefeited their right to be respected even as superiors by Catholics. Present Church superiors have so betrayed the Faith that they can in no way be considered the real churchmen.

7 Archbishop Lefebvre As for Archbishop Lefebvre, he was a living relic from the past. He remained fixed in an antiquated mentality. Archbishop Lefebvre could have done so much good if only he had stayed in the Church by being obedient. Archbishop Lefebvre was a heroic defender of the Faith, the most truly Catholic bishop since Vatican II. Archbishop Lefebvre was a little soft on modernism, for instance when he signed most documents of Vatican II. Archbishop Lefebvre was Catholic Tradition's worst enemy, because his false resistance paralysed the real resistance to Vatican II.











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Church Militant TV and the SSPX - Again

+ JMJ The old narrative used to be that the SSPX was 'schismatic' and 'excommunicated'. Now the excommunication has been lifted for a number of years and the only ones who think it still has effect are the 'resistors'. That leaves the other opponents of the SSPX with the label 'schismatic'. Make it clear, the conservative Catholics have issues with the SSPX probably because they violate some of their assumptions about the Faith and this crisis of the Church. Church Militant TV is one of these the exists along the Catholic thought spectrum. They like the Traditional Mass but must ensure that they don't get tarred with the same 'schismatic' brush that the liberals use against the SSPX.  So what do they do, they use the same brush against the SSPX. The funny thing is that even when the Church does speak, they don't want to listen and persist in calling the SSPX 'schismatic'. Here's a transcript of the latest s...

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...

The Position of the SSPX on Canonizations by the Saint Factory

+ JMJ I have sometimes been criticized for including 'St' as a title for Pope John Paul II et al. I've given my reasons here  in a discussion with Alex Long. The question is one of prudence in discussions with ntCatholics and in some cases with tCatholics. In discussions with:  ntCatholics, I will use the title in order to continue the discussion and help them arrive at a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. tCatholics, I will use the title in order to broaden their perspective on the doctrine of dogmatic facts. This broader perspective is, in my opinion, essential maintaining a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. So from a doctrinal position, I have written the article Dogmatic Fact of Fancy  and includes a reference on canonizations. Now, I know the position of the SSPX is that the canonizations are doubtful (see references below) and I also know of at least one non-SSPX theologian who agrees with the level of doubt du...