Skip to main content

What the heck is grec?

+
JMJ

One of the fall back positions taken by the 'resistance' is to say "what about GREC?".

Up to now I've always said: What the heck was GREC?

First let's start with my perspective and early assumptions.

  • Perspective:
    • The SSPX exists for the Catholic Church to help in the recovery from this crisis. 
    • In that view I have seen a number of 'modern' priests visit the SSPX priories.  Some for discussion, others for training in saying the Tridentine Mass.
  • Assumptions based on this perspective when I became aware of the involvement of the SSPX in theological debates at GREC:
    • This is a 'none' item as it is simply the extension of the work of the SSPX to help other Catholics understand:
    • The SSPX did not compromise on the core items
    • To refuse communion with other Catholics is schismatic (Pick either the 1917 or 1982 code of Canon Law).  Naturally, it is not that the SSPX shuns (per se) the other Catholics, it is that we are shunned.
What is the reality about GREC?

It appears that my assumptions were correct:
“The Society of Saint Pius X considers that the solution to the crisis cannot skimp on a rigorous clarification of the doctrinal questions in dispute, for it does not believe in the efficacy of medications that treat only the symptoms and not the cause” (pg. 140).
Just yelling at the top of our lungs that the New Mass is evil etc doesn't help much.  It is necessary to be able to put forth rational arguments to support this position. 

In short theological disagreements are resolved by having theological arguments.

That 'resistors' have a narrow and misguided perspective on the SSPX, its mission, and the nature of the Church is not the fault of the SSPX.

It is their own.

I've written the following statement before:
It is important to adhere to what the Church ACTUALLY teaches not what WE BELIEVE it teaches.
There are those who believe that the Catholic Church is represented by a few disparate souls who are labelled as 'home aloners sedevacantists'.  In order to believe this, they need to re-imagine a number of doctrines of the Church.  But no doctrine is too large to re-imagine in order for them to believe what they want to believe.

It is the same with the 'resistors'.





P^3

Source: Angelus Press (hopefully they won't object to my lifting the entire article.)





Catholic or Compromised: What is the GREC?


Blog Note: Over the past couple of years, a great deal of misinformation has been circulating about the group known as the GREC, including what some on the traditionalist spectrum seem to regard as a desire for compromise between tradition and novelty. Despite there being no justification for this claim, it has continued to circulate. In the interest of justice, we offer the following from reliable sources who are familiar with the group and its work, and offer the following clarifications.
As a result of misinformation, or one-sided application of information received and badly digested, it has become necessary to address the issue of the GREC, much mentioned in recent correspondence.
The acronym GREC is French in origin. Its meaning in English translation is a study group for Catholics.
A book published fairly recently in France by Nouvelles Editions Latines traces the origins and development and topics discussed in the study sessions between Traditional and Conciliar Catholics. The text was written by a French priest, Fr. Michel Lelong, and contains many contributions by other participants.
Regarding the GREC and its presentation to the public, it is clearly stated on page 71, “in this chapter dedicated to the Second Vatican Council as in the previous chapters the author [Fr. Lelong] presents his point of view. The viewpoints of the other participants will be given later on in relation to the way in which the last Council was received and lived. So it will be with all the other chapters of the book.”
The contribution of Fr. Alain Lorans, the editor of DICI, a publication of the Society of Saint Pius X, can be found on pages 136-141 of Fr. Lelong’s work.
On page 137, Fr. Lorans writes, “However, if a climate of Charity appears necessary to us, it is not enough for all that. A peaceful dialogue is not an end in itself, but an indispensable means of reaching the truth.”
“The GREC does not seek a compromise made up of half- truths or things not said; our mutual charity does not exclude frankness, on the contrary it demands it” (source: pp. 136-137).
“The Society of Saint Pius X considers that the solution to the crisis cannot skimp on a rigorous clarification of the doctrinal questions in dispute, for it does not believe in the efficacy of medications that treat only the symptoms and not the cause” (pg. 140).
As Cardinal Ottaviani said, Veritatem facientes in caritati. Speaking in Charity does not mean not speaking strongly (source: L’Eglise et La Cité).
On the matter of the authorization given him by Bishop Bernard Fellay to take part in the meetings of the GREC, Fr. Lorans writes – “I received permission from the Superior General to participate in the meetings of the GREC. He confided in me that he believed only in the possibility of a dialogue at this informal level, as the gates of the official structures appeared to him at the time, 1997 — the formal launch of the GREC — to be blocked and bolted. In fact, the GREC was an informal group, a few dozen people that met between 1997 and 2011 in Paris.”
When the official discussions began between the Roman theologians and those of the Society, the GREC meetings no longer served any useful function, and so ended towards the end of 2011.
“Just as with the GREC and Roman discussions, the constant aim of the Society was to make better known the traditional doctrinal positions and not to negotiate a practical agreement of whatever kind. No member of the GREC, whether traditionalist or conciliar, ever received a mandate from his superiors to proceed in that direction.”
That is why Fr. Loran’s wrote on page 136, “The GREC is not so pretentious as to settle the crisis. We know that the solution is not in our hands and that it will only come from those who have the grace of state to take such decisions”
With its infinitely more modest means, the GREC debates were in line with the Scholastic method of discussion, and general apologetic principles applied in controversy.
To see this one must not be merely content with a partial view of things but above all be honest in seeing and quoting both sides fairly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

Australia: Seal of the Confessional Outlawed at the Federal Level

+ JMJ This is simply another step in the attack on the Catholic Church. Interestingly, California's attempt to do the same failed. P^3 Courtesy of FSSPX.news Australia: Seal of the Confessional Outlawed at the Federal Level December 19, 2019 Source: fsspx.news On December 2, 2019, the Australian Conference of Bishops (ACBC) denounced the agreement between the Attorneys General of each state and the Australian federal government, with the aim of standardizing the laws imposing on priests the obligation to denounce any alleged fact of ill-treatment of minors that would be learned in the context of the sacrament of penance. “Counterproductive and unjust” are the terms with which Archbishop Mark Coleridge, Archbishop of Brisbane and President of the ACBC, denounced the new prejudicial legal norms on the sacramental seal of the confessional in Australia. The attorneys gener...

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

Tradical Commentary on: Restore DC Catholicism: SSPX And Austrilian Bishops - Two Different Errors

+ JMJ An interesting thing has happened on the discussion that prompted my article on whether it is sinful to attend the Novus Ordo Missae .  The blog owner of RDCC has shut down discussion by locking the article. That is their prerogative, but I am puzzled as to why? Perhaps it has something to do with some of the latter comments. They didn't believe the teaching on intention with regards to confecting the Sacraments.  This is not the first time I've experienced incredulity on this topic ( reference articles ). Really this isn't about what they believe but the truth. They seem to believe that the objections to the Novus Ordo Missae are simply about "overly delicate sensibilities".  In response to this I am reblogging a number of articles by the SSPX. Perhaps it was the comment made by Bishop Schneider, a currently well revered hero (who deserved the accolades) but apparently has said something similar to the SSPX.   I suspect that it is more...