Skip to main content

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

 +

JMJ

It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith.

I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point.

It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.  

I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him.

So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics?

Probably quite a lot about what not to do.

First, don't burn out on the crisis? 

When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too thin.  For example,  I received an email from a director on a Friday afternoon and read only the first couple of lines before I started to get upset. So I set it aside. When I read it again Sunday evening, I realised I had been saved from making a big gaff by not responding in the mindset that I had on Friday.

Second, don't feed the Trolls. 

"Trolls" are people who simply can't hold a logical argument because they are emotionally instead of intellectually engaged. Because of this, they have a problem handling a logical argument that undermines their own ... and in most cases Trolls need to create a new reality to keep it all together.  This is a great example of Cognitive Dissonance theory at work. 

Simply put, if someone defends an absurdity, disengage. 

When a person is irrational, anything that contradicts their position causes them to hold on to it, to believe it, all the more firmly. With every contradiction, even if you have incontrovertible proof, they will dig their hole deeper.

So don't waste your precious time and energy on them. Pray for them, but realise that you can't change them, only God can reach their hearts.

Third, be grateful.

I'll simply refer to the article on gratitude (link).

Fourth, know the Catholic truth, not your truth.

I've had arguments with people that are ignorant of what the Catholic Church actually teaches and are, apparently, incapable of drawing distinctions.  For example, do the Muslims worship the same God as Catholics?

So before you try to tar and feather me ... I've already addressed this in an article in 2014 Is the object of Catholic, Jewish and Islamic worship the same God? (link)   

So you need to draw the right distinctions and remove your assumptions that surround how you feel about the assertion.  Back in 2012 Catholicam (back on Ignis Ardens) rejected the distinction ... effectively contradicting the Catholic Encyclopedia.

So make certain you can draw the right distinctions, inferences and understanding of what Catholic Teaching actually contains vs what you may selfishly or pridefully want it to say.  

Also remember that proving someone wrong is a case of winning the battle but losing the war. Everyone wants to be right and it takes a good dose of humility to admit when we've been wrong.  

Without humility and grace you may lose the person you're arguing with.

Fifth, take responsibility for your baggage.

Steve Skojec seemed to be carrying an awful lot of baggage that he aired on twitter etc.  The baggage included what wrongs he felt a disgraced congregation had done to him ... sorry I can't remember the details of the article.  

Suffice to say, with 20/20 hindsight, Steve Skojec was probably not the person to start a Catholic media outlet. I've seen others burdened with historical baggage falter in the secular world.

So the lesson is, if you can't practice prudence and even little slights get to you, then you should avoid trying to fix the world.  Work for your own salvation and those for whom you have responsibility.  Then take from the surplus for others.

Also, before undertaking any endeavour, be honest about your motivations.  

For example, I know that I'm not going to change the Church all by myself. This blog is about documenting my studies, ponderings and sharing them with anyone who wants to take the time to read them. 

Conclusion

So you have to keep it together and if you or someone you should trust says you're losing your grip take a step back. Otherwise you'll risk following in the path of these once luminary Catholic personalities.

 

P^3



 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

Schism

There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...

Regarding Post: Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer no longer ... now Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer (Can't see this being a problem...)

 + JMJ   I've been watching the popularity of the post about Fr. Pfeiffer's attempted episcopal consecration and its continued top listing on the 'popular posts' list at the bottom of posts.  After some thought, I decided that I don't want to be responsible for anyone joining Fr. Pfeiffer's 'group', however unlikely that would be at this time. So I have reverted the article to the draft state. If anyone wants it reinstated, I would ask that they comment on this post with a rationale for reinstatement. P^3