Skip to main content

Vocations - Fr. Delatour 1992

+
JMJ

I know Fr. De La Tour personally and was greatly influenced by his spirituality from my formative years under his tutelage.

These words are wise and ring true as much today as they did almost a quarter century ago.

P^3



Ave Maria

April 1992

Dear Father Laisney,

Since the topic of vocations seems to preoccupy everyone at present, I thought of writing you a letter on this subject. I hope and pray that this small contribution may be helpful to you. We indeed need more priests in the Society and I understand the concern of our Superior General voiced in the March issue of “Cor Unum”: The harvest is indeed great, but how few are the laborers! More than ever we need to pray to the Sacred Heart so that He may give us more priests. But prayer, which should come first, does not take away our duty to do everything in our power to help young men to hear the Divine Calling.

I recently happened to read an article written in America in the fifties for a periodical destined for priests. It was about a survey among 2,000 students in eight minor seminaries. They were given a questionnaire about their vocation to the priesthood. I found it very interesting to study the reasons these young men gave for their entrance in the seminary: “I wanted to say Mass”: 1326 out of 2000 gave this as their main attraction. “I wanted to help others” came in on a close second with 1306 checks. “I like the life of the priest” got 1186 checks. “I wanted to be like a certain priest” was fourth with 828 checks. (The other ten reasons were not as important). I think that these data point out in what direction our efforts should bear. If we could give young men an attraction towards the priesthood, this hopefully would lead them to ponder on a possible vocation, and then to receive the grace moving them to make the final decision to give themselves to God. I would like therefore to make the following suggestions:


  1. We should explain the ceremonies of the Mass to children (and especially to our altar boys). In Summer Camps or Catechism Sessions, lessons about the Vestments, Sacred Vessels and Linens etc. were always appreciated. Children enjoyed learning about the great Mystery of our Faith. It is in doing this that we will plant in their hearts a love for the Mass and in some boys a desire to be priests at the altar.
  2. We should also develop the missionary spirit in our teenagers, e.g. have them visit old people in hospitals with an apostolic purpose. When I entered Econe in the mid-seventies, I was struck by the number of vocations coming out from Boy-Scout Troops. More than half of the seminarians in my year had done some scouting! I think it is because of the formation of character and the spirit of “service” which was instilled in us (cf “Promesse Scoute” etc..) The Eucharistic Crusade is also very good, since it gives zeal for souls (Apostolate of Prayer).
  3. It seems important to organize contacts between the priests and teenagers. We need to cultivate the attraction towards the priesthood in the better ones, i.e. the elite. “To sow the seeds of perfect purity and to arouse a desire for virginity has always been a function of the priesthood.” (St. Ambrose). Spiritual direction is important of course, the best situation is found in a Traditional School where the priest can follow-up the same boy during several years and thus nurture the little seed. As the Popes always said, good schools are one of the main sources for vocations. “It is necessary that the Catholic spirit of our schools, from which priestly vocations are expected, be improved”(Pius XII) .In places where we have no SSPX schools , we could promote home-schooling in order to withdraw the children from the public school system. We should also have recollection days, picnics, outings, camps, week-ends, where young men can meet the priest, talk to him, confide in him. Visits to the seminary could be organized.
  4. In the same study quoted earlier, one question was about the influence received, 669 young men said that their mothers influenced them very much in making the choice to go to the seminary. Only 407 stated having not been influenced at all by them. The rest admitted various degrees of influence. It means therefore that in 1593 cases out of 2000, the mother was one of the determining factors in the shaping of vocations. I believe that mothers need to receive spiritual direction on how to be good mothers. A truly Catholic mother with a strong interior life has more chance to receive the grace of vocations in her family than worldly ones. 
  5. This brings up the topic of instruction. Pope Pius XI said that “ the first and most natural garden” where vocations should blossom is the family. He even adds that: “Exceptions to the rule are rare and do nothing but confirm the rule itself”. This is why the same pope was imploring priests to use every means, by words and writings, to instruct parents about their obligations. Good books on the family should be put in the hands of parents. When it is possible to arrange them, conferences on the education of children etc.,  are extremely helpful. (The Dominican Sisters in Post Falls give talks to the parents and they are appreciated.) When the spirit of sacrifice reigns in a family, souls are more generous and therefore more disposed to receive the divine calling.
  6. We need a little booklet on the different Traditional seminaries, monasteries and convents, in order to inform young people about these religious communities. In 1981-1982, I showed slides about the religious life in the USA (along with a sermon on vocations) and this seemed to bring good results. I know of at least one young woman who came to see me after one of these presentations and is now a professed nun of the Society.
  7. To finish, (and this is maybe the most important suggestion) since vocations are gifts from God, we should have the parents pray. “Rogate Dominum Messis ut mittet operarios in vineam suam”. Fr. Mateo, the great apostle of the Sacred Heart, promoted “Night Adoration in the home” as a means to obtain vocations. (Remember Mrs. Vaughan who, thanks to her daily holy hour, obtained six priests and five nuns among her thirteen children!) We have promoted the Enthronement but I do not know if we have explained to people its interior spirit. Fr. Mateo wanted the monthly holy hour of reparation to be the means of living the enthronement in the home, i.e. of honoring Jesus as the King of the family.

In conclusion, I know that the priests in our district are very busy and that because of this difficult situation, it is not easy to implement these suggestions. But at least we could in a small way begin to aim in this direction.

Dear Father, I hope these few lines were helpful. I am united with you at the feet of Mary Queen of the Clergy to beg of her “many holy priests” for the spreading of the reign of the Sacred Heart.

Sincerely,

Father Herve de la Tour

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6b: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 1)

 + JMJ Principle 1: Realize that something is amiss in the Catholic Church The world in which I had my Traditional Awakening, is one in which practically anything pre-Conciliar such as liturgy, doctrinc, and even dogmas are either suppressed, ignored or re-framed to be acceptable to the ‘world’. What is more, the people adhering to these pre-conciliar teachings and liturgy are persecuted by other members of the Catholic Church. The things that non-Trads say about Trads can be quite extreme. For example, accusations against Traditionalists include that they are: A revival of the Jansenists (link) , Schismatics, Heretics, Uncharitable, Lefebrists Radicals Integrists When one group of Catholics is persecuted by the others for simply wanting to live as Catholics before them did for generations … well something is wrong. Further, we need to realize that when what was previously condemned is now promoted and what was previously promoted as the trut...

How is the SSPX prepared to accept the Second Vatican Council??? - Reblogged and Updated.

+ JMJ The Archbishop remained steadfast. In the 1980s, in his correspondence with then-Cardinal Ratzinger, Archbishop Lefebvre stated his position that the criterion for interpreting Vatican II in light of Tradition comprises three elements: 1) He and the SSPX would accept anything in Vatican II that is clearly consistent with Tradition; 2) Any ambiguous texts of Vatican II must be interpreted strictly according to Tradition; according to the consistent teaching of the Church throughout the centuries. 3) Anything in the Council that cannot be interpreted according to Tradition should be revised. The Archbishop laid this out explicitly in his letters to Cardinal Ratzinger in 1982 and 1985. CF News: Rome-SSPX: Background to the Doctrinal Discussions CF News: The April 15 Deadline A few years ago Tony La Rosa (aka ecclesia militans a Toronto based 'resistor') had a difficult time accepting this approach to the council. He held that it must be completely tossed as...