Skip to main content

The Tridentine Mass - Ultimate Cultural Artifact

+
JMJ

Lex Orandi - Lex Credendi, the Law of Prayer is the Law of Belief.  Whoever coined this phrase embodied perfectly the conclusions made by the thought leaders of Organizational Psychology over a hundred years later.

As I've written before: The Mass is the ultimate cultural artifact as it contains and expresses the beliefs, values and assumptions of the Catholic Religion.  Or at least it did until the promulgation of the Novus Ordo Missae.

What beliefs, values and assumptions does the Novus Ordo Missae express? The root lies in the first few words of Sancrosanctum Concilium (SC) as quoted in Rorate's post on the Mass of the Council:

1. This sacred Council has several aims in view: it desires to impart an ever increasing vigor to the Christian life of the faithful; to adapt more suitably to the needs of our own times those institutions which are subject to change; to foster whatever can promote union among all who believe in Christ; to strengthen whatever can help to call the whole of mankind into the household of the Church. The Council therefore sees particularly cogent reasons for undertaking the reform and promotion of the liturgy.
2. For the liturgy, "through which the work of our redemption is accomplished," [1] most of all in the divine sacrifice of the Eucharist, is the outstanding means whereby the faithful may express in their lives, and manifest to others, the mystery of Christ and the real nature of the true Church. (source)



How this obviously ecumenical direction of SC were put into practice is evident for Traditional Catholics, but less so for those who have been steeped in the Novus Ordo Missae for the past 50 years.

Ultimately, people operate on principles (cognitive models) to give structure to and guide their actions within the World.  An understanding of the principles used to guide the creation of the Novus Ordo Missae should shed considerable light on what spirit motivated these changes.

Most Traditional Catholics know of the common references as found on sspx.org and in the Ottaviani Intervention. But there has been more work on this topic and recently the work of Dr. Lauren Pristas was recommended to me by a friend.

Attached below are links to her site and some of the works of interest.

P^3

NB: Dr. Pristas is an academic and the linked words are written in that mode. It will not necessarily be an easy read.


L. Pristas, Ph.D., Professor of Theology, Department of Theology and Philosophy

Theological Principles that Guided the Redaction of the Roman Missal (1970)
The Orations of the Vatican II Missal:  Policies for Revision
The Collects at Sunday Mass: An Examination of the Revisions of Vatican II
The Pre- and Post-Vatican II Collects of the Dominican Doctors of the Church


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Look Back: A short history of the SSPX

 + JMJ  I started a timeline a while back but never finished it.  Fortunately, here's one that brings us up to 1994!!! P^3 http://archives.sspx.org/SSPX_FAQs/a_short_history_of_the_sspx-part-1.htm   A short history of the SSPX A presentation given by Fr. Ramon Angles in Kansas City, MO, on the 25th Anniversary of the founding of the SSPX and reprinted from the January 1996 issue of The Angelus . Part 1 The history of the Society of St. Pius X begins, of course, in the mind of God. But do not believe that its temporal origin is to be found solely at the time of the post-conciliar crisis. The Society of St. Pius X was made possible ...

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

News Roundup: February 23, 2026

 + JMJ February started off with a chaotic flurry of Rome and SSPX interactions. I've pulled together quite a list of internet articles (see below) and more keep appearing on my regular searches. ... So I think I need to stop adding as of today.  I think that there are only two documents that bear a separate analysis - the two press releases made by Rome and the SSPX.  One element that I learned is that the SSPX intends to consecrate five bishops.  We now know that the SSPX is going to proceed with the Consecration of Five (5) Auxiliary Bishops.  I will post another article on this event in more detail once time allows. Here is a discussion by John-Henry Westen on his YouTube Channel Sign of the Cross. My only comments at this time on the events are: We've been in this situation in 1988, so what is old is new again. For those who feel that the SSPX is leaving communion, yeah ... no. This does not materially change the situation of the SSPX as the legal aspe...

Is Dogma Important?

+ JMJ Are the Dogmas of the Catholic Church important? Apparently not. At least not if it is a 'stumbling block' (read: Archbishop Bugnini) between our separated brethren (read: schismatic & orthodox). But I'm getting ahead of myself ...