Skip to main content

Cultural Lines in the Sand

+
JMJ



Cultural assumptions are the foundation upon which a culture stands (or falls).



What applies to large corporate organizations also applies to the Catholic Church.  There will, of course, be sub-cultures that operate within the larger culture of the organization.  Each of these sub-cultures will have some elements in common (forming the culture as a whole) as well as their own cultural assumptions.

An example of this can be found in the recent separation of some individuals from the SSPX.  In this case the cultural assumption that appears to have been challenged is either or both:

  1. Whether or not Pope Benedict XVI actually had the authority and capability to issue a legitimate command that would meet the criteria requiring obedience. 
  2. The assumption that the 'conciliar Church' refers to a movement within the Catholic Church.

The clarity and direction provided by the leadership of the SSPX has resulted in a reaffirmation of the two core assumptions and those people who hold contrary assumptions have in general separated themselves from the SSPX.  A number of those people have now revealed themselves as holding a variant of sede-vacantism.

In general terms there are at present two sub-cultures vying for dominance within the Catholic Church:

  1. Progressivists:  Hold cultural assumptions that have been dominant since the council, usually described as the 'spirit of the council'.
  2. Traditionalists: Hold cultural assumptions that were dominant  prior to the council, sometimes described as crypto-lefebvrist, lefebvrist, integrist.
There is a third sub-culture that basically is acquiescing to the dominant culture of the leadership.  I typically refer to this group as a hybridized Catholic/Protestant culture as its assumptions have been severely altered by the liturgy and progressivist culture dominant within the Church in the last 50 years. This cultural group is sometimes called 'conservatives' and what is going to be discovered soon is where is the line in the cultural sand beyond which they will not pass?

Obviously, the Traditionalists have already stated and stood by their various cultural lines (FSSP et al, SSPX  et al), with the attendant and predictable cultural immune responses.

Which issue will be the rubicon for the conservatives?




What will the conservatives succeed in conserving in the coming Synod on the Family?

Will this be one of the defining moments in the history of this crisis?

God knows, time will reveal.

Until then ...

P^3
Prayer
Penance
Patience

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Benedict XIV, Encyclical Annus Qui 1749

 + JMJ At Mass today I started reading some of the commentary added to the Ideal Daily Missal, as I listened to the Gregorian Chant and Hymns, this is what my eyes fell upon. There is certainly no one who does not desire a certain difference between ecclesiastical change and theatrical melodies, and who does not acknowledge that the use of theatrical and profane change must not be tolerated in churches. Benedict XIV, Annus Qui, 1749 In my experience what is forbidden is what actually happens in Modern Catholic Churches (Latin Rite - Novus Ordo). P^3

Dogmatic Fact or Fancy III

+ JMJ Recently, I've been engaged in a 'dogmatic fact' discussion / argument and a thought occurred to me. Based on what reading I had done, I had concluded that the dogmatic fact of who is Pope was fixed in time - meaning that acceptance of the Pope at the time of election provided infallible surety that the election was valid and that indeed the elected Cardinal/Bishop was Pope at that moment. Then I realized that some people believed that the dogmatic fact meant they were always Pope.  At the time I thought they meant that the understanding of the doctrine was that the one time recognition made that person infallibly the Pope until he either abdicated or died. A light went on this morning. Does the continual acceptance of the Pope by the hierarchy continually 'refresh' the dogmatic fact - meaning we can be certain that the Pope is'still' Pope etc? I asked a friend (a real theologian) and he pointed out that the Pope is already elected. The...

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...