Theological Flint: Does “not intending” sin make it not sin?

JMJ

Dr. Malloy pulls things together pretty well concerning when is an action sinful etc.

Very appropriate for Pachemama-Gate.

Dr. Malloy has graciously given me permission to re-post his article on Tradicat.

P^3

Courtesy of Dr. Malloy - Theological Flint

Does “not intending” sin make it not sin?

October 26, 2019

No. Acts are objectively good or evil in themselves. Acts objectively good in themselves cannot be excused by “lack of intention” or “non-intention” of their evil. An evil intention may make an otherwise good act evil. For instance, to donate money for the sake of one’s reputation is evil. The object of the act is good, but the intention is evil. So, the act is evil. But a good intention does not render an evil object good.

I cannot murder you so as to save someone else, even so as to save a city. Why? Because I first choose the evil itself, to murder you. In doing so, I become an enemy of life and an enemy of God. I am now an enemy of Christ. In such a state, I can in no way intend a good end in a holy manner. Rather, lacking holiness, I move forward easily succumbing to evil thoughts and deeds. This state does not fit with my wanting a good end in a holy manner. As St. Paul says, do not do evil that good may come. God forbid.

So, CAN WE DO THE OBJECTIVELY EVIL ACT OF IDOLATRY AND YET MAKE THE ACT GOOD BY “NOT INTENDING” THE ACT AS IDOLATRY?

Why don’t you bring that question to the old, feeble woman of Maccabees. Could she have just “eaten pork” and not intended disobedience to God? Was that the way she saw it? Good enough?

Nonsense.

Bring it up to the martyrs. Why not just burn a little incense before Caesar? By doing so, you save your life in an evil regime. You get to raise your kids in troubled times. You get to keep your job, etc. Just a little incense. Just don’t “intend” idolatry.

NONSENSE.

What is the purpose of an idol? The purpose of an idol is to be worshipped. And is that act good? No, it is evil. In all cases, evil.

ALL THOSE WHO HEAR THE VOICE OF CHRIST CRY OUT IN ANGUISH AND IN PROTEST AGAINST THE WORSHIP OF IDOLS.

Comments

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean??? According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible. It means that they enjoy the beatific vision. ... that's it. That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians. It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious. That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

+ JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'. This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium. If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making. It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX. The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience. The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members. It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

How Much Disobedience Constitutes Schism? - A Remnant Article

I came across this old article in one of my searches and thought, since there is talk of schism in the air ... concerning the SSPX and not the German Bishops Conference ... it would good to post it here. Addendum: More on Schism by Tantamergo. Courtesy of the Remnant How Much Disobedience Constitutes Schism ? Fr. Brian W. Harrison, O.S. GUEST COLUMNIST, Puerto Rico

Tradicat

Search This Blog