Skip to main content

Michael Voris, Cardinal Burke and Mark Shea

+
JMJ

I read the script for Michael Voris' little "What's a Catholic To Do?" piece and I was going to show the flaws ... and than I saw the satirical piece by the Remnant.

So, in the interest of keeping some perspective, I'm going to repost what is an excellent piece taking, what I believe to be, shots at the irrational position the CMTV has decided to take.  Not to mention that they chastise people for not following their 'high road'.

Of course I find it laughable that now Mark Shea as posted:

"Well done, Michael Voris

He apologizes for his “Pope Harming the Church” video:....
The sad thing is that all Michael did was repeat the words said by a Cardinal who just defended the perennial teaching of the Church.  Now Mark Shea thinks he did wrong, which means that Cardinal Burke did wrong.
I only hope that when Michael's head stops spinning it is facing forward!

Courtesy of The Remnant

P^3



Wednesday, October 22, 2014

BREAKING: Michael Voris Quits CMTV, Going to Work for Mark Shea

Written by  
Rate this item
(19 votes)
Michael VorisMichael Voris
As many of you know, Michael Voris recently apologized for reporting Cardinal Raymond Burke’s statement that Pope Francis was doing harm to the Church. Hours later, however, Voris came to the conclusion that his own logic additionally forbade him from continuing on at CMTV. In a statement released minutes ago, Voris says the following:

“Clarification (Part Deux)

Hello everyone. MichaeVoris coming tyou from Rome with a secondclarification.

Today 
I aired a breaking news report apologizing for my egregious and sinful behavior in reporting the words of Cardinal Burke that Pope Francis is harming the Church. 

However , after further reflection, I have realized that I can no longer continue saying on air how cardinals, bishops and priests are harming the Church either. Yes, it is true that for a long time I have disliked the bishops and have openlmockedthem. I have practically created a cottage industry out of combing thru eversyllable they utter and producingr eams of criticisms over them.
I have introduced to the Catholic worlthings thamost Catholics would never hear of if it werent for my ongoing discussions of them. I have been sewing massive and countless doubtin the minds of many Catholics about the bishops ’legitimacy and authority and driving theto consider leaving the Church and entering the SSPX….I’m sorry, not the SSPX….I simply meant “independent Catholic enclaves that exercise no legitimate authoritin the Church.”

I wish tmake abundantly clear that in no way shape or form do condone anything of the sort.The bishops arelegitimate bishops and any kind of pretended communion witthe Churcwhile rejecting the bishops is not possible.You are either in full communion or you are not.

In short, my mistakes over the years are now being used to make hay and I decry that. For example Cardinal Dolan is a bishop. He is a Prince of the Church. We are called to love the successors of the Apostles, to pray for them. His is the first name I mention in offering up my daily flagellations, recitation of the Divine Office, diet of bread and water, wearing of a hair shirt, and caring for stray puppies at my local humane society.

I have dedicated the remainder of my life to serving the Church and to have to consider that I did something that brought some harm to Her makes me heart sick. On a personal note, to show you how bothered in spirit I am by my actions, I have made a general confession and will forgo receiving Holy Communion one day for every time I have criticized a cardinal bishop or priest. Thus, according to my calculations I will begin to receive Holy Communion again sometime in the next Presidential administration. 

Indeed, the bishops should not be publicly criticized by a lay Catholic, much less mocked and called insulting names and made the butt of jokes. If I continue to do that, then I will have to give an account to Our Lord for mocking His princes when I die.

I want no part of that. Again, I was mistaken, and that mistake should not be being multiplied by those who see it as an opportunity.

As a consequence, I can no longer make videos or work at CMTV. 

Insshea and voristead I will be working for Mark Shea who has been gracious enough to offer me a small position on his two new radio shows. There I will be certain to never again say anything of consequence that will give any soul the slightest impression that anything is amiss in the Conciliar Church. As extra penance I have agreed to groom Mark’s cats, iron the super-hero costumes he will wear on the air and laugh hysterically at all of his inane and corny jokes. This will indeed be my ticket to bypass purgatory.

Thank you and please keep me in your prayers. And, for the last time….GOD Love you.  Michael Voris"

Brothers in Arms--Michael Voris and Mark Shea

Comments

  1. Though Michael Voris has repented both in extreme humility , (a la Uriah Heap in the British work of Charles Dickens "David Copperfield" ), and with sarcasm (? ), he has awakened my sense of awareness on the dangers of invisible spiritual harm that
    surround us ALL, on a daily basis.
    His statement about NOT RECEIVING COMMUNION, is what SAINT THERESA OF AVILA (not LISIEUX or CALCUTTA) but AVILA warns us NOT to do. (WE ARE ALL SINNERS according to SAINT JOHN´s GOSPEL.)
    His sin of thinking critically is good. We are all allowed to think. It is a God-given gift.
    He stated his thoughts publicly . . . though, is where the problem lies. Morally speaking, he has not been made officially more that a layman . . . and he has made very
    clear theological statements with a masterful use of the english language. . . right out
    in the open. Pope Francis has not excommunicated him and Jesus Christ needs intelligent defence . . .
    That he states sarcastically or otherwise that he reads the OFFICE daily, has got to count for something. However, how can sound thinking ruin the Church.
    The Borgia Popes and clerics were wrong, and we see this today. It is great to have a
    CURRENT watch- dog, reminding us that God (FATHER , SON, and HOLY GHOST) is ALIVE and WATCHING out for our morality. We must receive something good and holy from the current age we live in. The voice of Michael Voris is neutral until we make it our own. Whether we personally accept or reject what our YOUTUBE spits out to us, is our own personal responsibility ! True that SAINT Paul said: THAT WE MUST CONSIDER OUR WEAKER BROTHER IN THE ACT OF SCANDALISING with reference to excessive drinking or other immoral actions. Saint
    Paul said: that HOMOSEXUALS, DRUNKARDS , THIEVES and ADULTERERS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM. THIS IS THE MORALITY OF THE BIBLE . . .
    This book is called HOLY BIBLE throughout the last 2000 years ! WE ALL NEED TO FOLLOW IT WHILE ON EARTH ! This includes EVERYONE: whether they are popes, priests, bishops or just plain everyday people. "If you love me, you will keep my COMMANDMENTS " are the true words of Jesus CHRIST not saint Peter or pope FRANCIS. Every moment we live on earth, we are subject to TEMPTATION by SATAN !
    COMMANDMENTS ARE NOT SUGGESTIONS as some hierarchy seem to "suggest" in their long "watered down" encyclicals. I for one, am glad that there exist CURRENT
    "voices crying in the desert!" and making straight the paths of the LORD. Saint Theresa of Avila states in her own DIARY, that even while we are wicked, we should never give up praying to God for His Mercy and GRACE. When we confess our sins, we NEED to receive COMMUNION and the more EUCHAHRISTIC GRACES WE RECEIVE in a valid HOLY MASS, the more strength and grace we have to protect us agains the huge invisible mass of demonic temptation that SURROUND US DAILY. THE MASS
    is the HIGHEST FORM OF PRAYER and during the last 2000 years, has been and is currently under ATTACK by SATAN. To gain spiritual strength, we must pray constantly and receive the HOLY EUCHARIST which Jesus Christ left behind Him on earth for us , in love. GOD FORGIVES US WHEN WE ARE TRULY REPENTENT and not adoring Him solely out of fear for retaliation and punishment. We, ALL, need mercy and grace from GOD, CONTANTLY WHILE ON EARTH .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Doctrinal Preamble April 15, 2012 vs Protocol 1988

+ JMJ Reproduced below are the Doctrinal Preamble of Bishop Fellay (2012) and Protocol of Archbishop Lefebvre (1988) for comparison. Perhaps when I have time I will add detailed commentary.  Now, given that Archbishop Lefebvre stated that there was nothing wrong with the 1988 text of the protocol, comparing it with that of Bishop Fellay ... where's the problem? Are as  Kaesekopf of Suscipedomine wrote : ...can someone explain why trads would reject this? Or rather, why a sedeplenist trad (who accepts the validity of the NO) would reject this?  Update: To make a comparison easier,  I have inserted the comparable elements of the Protocol developed by Archbishop Lefebvre with that of Bishop Fellay.  I have also included my own commentary in blue . Last thought, when I first read the preamble I thought ... ok so what's the problem?  Now I that I've read it again ... I still ask: What's the problem?  It was based on the Protocol signed by Ar...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

Lamentabili Sane #8 and Bishop Richard Williamson

"They are free from all blame who treat lightly the condemnations passed by the Sacred Congregation of the Index or by the Roman Congregations." -  LAMENTABILI SANE The above quotation is the 8th modernist thesis condemned in Lamentabili Sane by Pope St. Pius X. As a traditionalist, I obviously believe that the decrees of Lamentabili Sane are as valid today as they were almost a hundred years ago. Before anyone accuses me of contravening this article by my support of the SSPX, I would like to know what condemnation of what congregation is being 'treated lightly' by the SSPX. In this case, I mean what doctrinal position that the SSPX holds has been explicitly condemned by a congregation.