Skip to main content

SSPX: Social Doctrine: Thoughts from St. Pius X

 +
JMJ

 In the confusion created by the Catholic Church withdrawal from the moral life of nations, we have errors on both sides.  The Church has been here before and the principles of social doctrine are clear.

Respect your superiors, even the bad / evil ones, not because of what they do, but because of the authority that they have received from God.

P^3

Courtesy SSPX.com

https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-x/it/motu_proprio/documents/hf_p-x_motu-proprio_19031218_fin-dalla-prima.html


While Rerum Novarum is considered the definitive document on Social Doctrine and workers, Pope St. Pius X was not silent on the subject:

To follow up on a previous post, “Labor Day: What Should Catholics Think?,” which surveyed Pope Leo XIII’s great social encyclical, Rerum Novarum, we present an overview of Pope St. Pius X’s 1903 motu proprio, Fin Dalla Prima Nostra. Recently reprinted in the July/August issue of The Angelus, this compact but illuminating document takes as its concern Catholic Action generally with five specific articles given on the relationship between workers and capitalists. Each directive is specifically rooted in the text of Rerum Novarum. We shall therefore quote each directive in full with some brief commentary to follow.
 

VII. The following are obligations of justice binding on the proletariat and the workingman: To perform fully and faithfully the work which has been freely and, according to equity, agreed upon; not to injure the property or outrage the person of masters; even in the defense of their own rights to abstain from acts of violence, and never to make mutiny of their defense."

This provision is straightforward enough. With an eye toward maintaining social peace and preventing the eruption of class warfare, St. Pius X directs workers to both fulfill their labor obligations and to refrain from acts of violence, even if their rights are trampled upon. This does not mean that workers have no recourse, however. Although not specifically stated, it stands to reason that workers who have been treated unjust should still have access to courts of law and other forms of mediation. Moreover, as Article XI of the motu proprio makes clear (see below), institutions should be established to help resolve disputes between workers and capitalists and create deeper ties within and between various economic sectors and firms.
 

VIII. The following are obligations of justice binding on capitalists: To pay just wages to their workingmen; not to injure their just savings by violence or fraud, or by overt or covert usuries; not to expose them to corrupting seductions and danger of scandal; not to alienate them from the spirit of family life and from love of economy; not to impose on them labor beyond their strength, or unsuitable for their age or sex."

Here the saintly Pope introduces strong medicine for anyone who believes that wages are “just” when set according to the prevailing market rate. As Leo XIII spelled out in Rerum Novarum, a just wage is one which allows a workingman to support himself and his family while building-up enough savings to acquire his own property. Further, as this article makes clear, capitalists cannot oblige or coerce workers into engaging in morally and spiritually destructive behavior, which can be taken to mean limiting the number of hours workers spend away from their families; ensuring that workers have the means to fulfill their Sunday and other holy day obligations; and not be required to depend in usurious lending from financial institutions to sustain themselves.
 

IX. It is an obligation for the rich and those who own property to succor the poor and the indigent, according to the precepts of the Gospel. This obligation is so grave that on the Day of Judgment special account will be demanded of its fulfillment, as Christ Himself has said (Matthew 25)."

Although all Christians are called by our Lord to perform acts of charity toward others, St. Pius X singles out the rich in particular to follow the precepts of the Gospel in caring for the poor and indigent. Note here that the Pope does not specify which mechanisms may or may not be used to ensure that the wealthy fulfill this obligation. While it may be said that private institutions at the local level may be best for ensuring that the least well off in society are provided the aid they need, government-run programs, fueled by equitable taxing measures, may also be justified depending on the state of need and social circumstances.
 

X. The poor should not be ashamed of their poverty, nor disdain the charity of the rich, for they should have especially in view Jesus the Redeemer, who, though He might have been born in riches, made Himself poor in order that He might ennoble poverty and enrich it with merits beyond price for heaven."

These consoling words are not intended to breed indifference toward the poor and their plight, but rather to remove the prejudice that those lacking in means are somehow second-class human beings who have been abandoned by God. At the same time, this article can be read as a reminder to all classes—rich and poor alike—of the special merits of poverty and that material wealth is not the final end of earthly existence.
 

XI. For the settlement of the social question much can be done by the capitalists and workers themselves, by means of institutions designed to provide timely aid for the needy and to bring together and unite mutually the two classes. Among these institutions are mutual aid societies, various kinds of private insurance societies, orphanages for the young, and, above all, associations among the different trades and professions."

This final article concerning capitalists and workers sets forth several suggestions for institutions which can both resolve issues between the classes and provide structures to help society’s needy in a timely manner. St. Pius X recognizes that matters will arise which cannot be resolved easily, and so the closer the different classes can be brought together with an eye toward their mutual interests, the more likely it becomes that society’s economic sphere can function smoothly with as little deleterious interruption as possible. While this ideal is still a long ways away from being actualized in our divided, atomized liberal-secular society, it is still an ideal Catholics must bear in mind when confronting concrete socio-economic disagreements.

Fin Dalla Prima Nostra is an important contribution to the Church’s social magisterium, but hardly the only one St. Pius X would make during his pontificate. Those seeking further elucidation on what Pope Sarto should consult his 1905 encyclical on Catholic Action in Italy, Il Fermo Proposito, along with the 1910 document, Notre Charge Apostolique, which bears directly on the permissible limits of Catholic political organization in liberal-democratic societies. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...