Skip to main content

SSPX: Social Doctrine: Thoughts from St. Pius X

 +
JMJ

 In the confusion created by the Catholic Church withdrawal from the moral life of nations, we have errors on both sides.  The Church has been here before and the principles of social doctrine are clear.

Respect your superiors, even the bad / evil ones, not because of what they do, but because of the authority that they have received from God.

P^3

Courtesy SSPX.com

https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-x/it/motu_proprio/documents/hf_p-x_motu-proprio_19031218_fin-dalla-prima.html


While Rerum Novarum is considered the definitive document on Social Doctrine and workers, Pope St. Pius X was not silent on the subject:

To follow up on a previous post, “Labor Day: What Should Catholics Think?,” which surveyed Pope Leo XIII’s great social encyclical, Rerum Novarum, we present an overview of Pope St. Pius X’s 1903 motu proprio, Fin Dalla Prima Nostra. Recently reprinted in the July/August issue of The Angelus, this compact but illuminating document takes as its concern Catholic Action generally with five specific articles given on the relationship between workers and capitalists. Each directive is specifically rooted in the text of Rerum Novarum. We shall therefore quote each directive in full with some brief commentary to follow.
 

VII. The following are obligations of justice binding on the proletariat and the workingman: To perform fully and faithfully the work which has been freely and, according to equity, agreed upon; not to injure the property or outrage the person of masters; even in the defense of their own rights to abstain from acts of violence, and never to make mutiny of their defense."

This provision is straightforward enough. With an eye toward maintaining social peace and preventing the eruption of class warfare, St. Pius X directs workers to both fulfill their labor obligations and to refrain from acts of violence, even if their rights are trampled upon. This does not mean that workers have no recourse, however. Although not specifically stated, it stands to reason that workers who have been treated unjust should still have access to courts of law and other forms of mediation. Moreover, as Article XI of the motu proprio makes clear (see below), institutions should be established to help resolve disputes between workers and capitalists and create deeper ties within and between various economic sectors and firms.
 

VIII. The following are obligations of justice binding on capitalists: To pay just wages to their workingmen; not to injure their just savings by violence or fraud, or by overt or covert usuries; not to expose them to corrupting seductions and danger of scandal; not to alienate them from the spirit of family life and from love of economy; not to impose on them labor beyond their strength, or unsuitable for their age or sex."

Here the saintly Pope introduces strong medicine for anyone who believes that wages are “just” when set according to the prevailing market rate. As Leo XIII spelled out in Rerum Novarum, a just wage is one which allows a workingman to support himself and his family while building-up enough savings to acquire his own property. Further, as this article makes clear, capitalists cannot oblige or coerce workers into engaging in morally and spiritually destructive behavior, which can be taken to mean limiting the number of hours workers spend away from their families; ensuring that workers have the means to fulfill their Sunday and other holy day obligations; and not be required to depend in usurious lending from financial institutions to sustain themselves.
 

IX. It is an obligation for the rich and those who own property to succor the poor and the indigent, according to the precepts of the Gospel. This obligation is so grave that on the Day of Judgment special account will be demanded of its fulfillment, as Christ Himself has said (Matthew 25)."

Although all Christians are called by our Lord to perform acts of charity toward others, St. Pius X singles out the rich in particular to follow the precepts of the Gospel in caring for the poor and indigent. Note here that the Pope does not specify which mechanisms may or may not be used to ensure that the wealthy fulfill this obligation. While it may be said that private institutions at the local level may be best for ensuring that the least well off in society are provided the aid they need, government-run programs, fueled by equitable taxing measures, may also be justified depending on the state of need and social circumstances.
 

X. The poor should not be ashamed of their poverty, nor disdain the charity of the rich, for they should have especially in view Jesus the Redeemer, who, though He might have been born in riches, made Himself poor in order that He might ennoble poverty and enrich it with merits beyond price for heaven."

These consoling words are not intended to breed indifference toward the poor and their plight, but rather to remove the prejudice that those lacking in means are somehow second-class human beings who have been abandoned by God. At the same time, this article can be read as a reminder to all classes—rich and poor alike—of the special merits of poverty and that material wealth is not the final end of earthly existence.
 

XI. For the settlement of the social question much can be done by the capitalists and workers themselves, by means of institutions designed to provide timely aid for the needy and to bring together and unite mutually the two classes. Among these institutions are mutual aid societies, various kinds of private insurance societies, orphanages for the young, and, above all, associations among the different trades and professions."

This final article concerning capitalists and workers sets forth several suggestions for institutions which can both resolve issues between the classes and provide structures to help society’s needy in a timely manner. St. Pius X recognizes that matters will arise which cannot be resolved easily, and so the closer the different classes can be brought together with an eye toward their mutual interests, the more likely it becomes that society’s economic sphere can function smoothly with as little deleterious interruption as possible. While this ideal is still a long ways away from being actualized in our divided, atomized liberal-secular society, it is still an ideal Catholics must bear in mind when confronting concrete socio-economic disagreements.

Fin Dalla Prima Nostra is an important contribution to the Church’s social magisterium, but hardly the only one St. Pius X would make during his pontificate. Those seeking further elucidation on what Pope Sarto should consult his 1905 encyclical on Catholic Action in Italy, Il Fermo Proposito, along with the 1910 document, Notre Charge Apostolique, which bears directly on the permissible limits of Catholic political organization in liberal-democratic societies. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...