Skip to main content

SSPX: Social Doctrine: Thoughts from St. Pius X

 +
JMJ

 In the confusion created by the Catholic Church withdrawal from the moral life of nations, we have errors on both sides.  The Church has been here before and the principles of social doctrine are clear.

Respect your superiors, even the bad / evil ones, not because of what they do, but because of the authority that they have received from God.

P^3

Courtesy SSPX.com

https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-x/it/motu_proprio/documents/hf_p-x_motu-proprio_19031218_fin-dalla-prima.html


While Rerum Novarum is considered the definitive document on Social Doctrine and workers, Pope St. Pius X was not silent on the subject:

To follow up on a previous post, “Labor Day: What Should Catholics Think?,” which surveyed Pope Leo XIII’s great social encyclical, Rerum Novarum, we present an overview of Pope St. Pius X’s 1903 motu proprio, Fin Dalla Prima Nostra. Recently reprinted in the July/August issue of The Angelus, this compact but illuminating document takes as its concern Catholic Action generally with five specific articles given on the relationship between workers and capitalists. Each directive is specifically rooted in the text of Rerum Novarum. We shall therefore quote each directive in full with some brief commentary to follow.
 

VII. The following are obligations of justice binding on the proletariat and the workingman: To perform fully and faithfully the work which has been freely and, according to equity, agreed upon; not to injure the property or outrage the person of masters; even in the defense of their own rights to abstain from acts of violence, and never to make mutiny of their defense."

This provision is straightforward enough. With an eye toward maintaining social peace and preventing the eruption of class warfare, St. Pius X directs workers to both fulfill their labor obligations and to refrain from acts of violence, even if their rights are trampled upon. This does not mean that workers have no recourse, however. Although not specifically stated, it stands to reason that workers who have been treated unjust should still have access to courts of law and other forms of mediation. Moreover, as Article XI of the motu proprio makes clear (see below), institutions should be established to help resolve disputes between workers and capitalists and create deeper ties within and between various economic sectors and firms.
 

VIII. The following are obligations of justice binding on capitalists: To pay just wages to their workingmen; not to injure their just savings by violence or fraud, or by overt or covert usuries; not to expose them to corrupting seductions and danger of scandal; not to alienate them from the spirit of family life and from love of economy; not to impose on them labor beyond their strength, or unsuitable for their age or sex."

Here the saintly Pope introduces strong medicine for anyone who believes that wages are “just” when set according to the prevailing market rate. As Leo XIII spelled out in Rerum Novarum, a just wage is one which allows a workingman to support himself and his family while building-up enough savings to acquire his own property. Further, as this article makes clear, capitalists cannot oblige or coerce workers into engaging in morally and spiritually destructive behavior, which can be taken to mean limiting the number of hours workers spend away from their families; ensuring that workers have the means to fulfill their Sunday and other holy day obligations; and not be required to depend in usurious lending from financial institutions to sustain themselves.
 

IX. It is an obligation for the rich and those who own property to succor the poor and the indigent, according to the precepts of the Gospel. This obligation is so grave that on the Day of Judgment special account will be demanded of its fulfillment, as Christ Himself has said (Matthew 25)."

Although all Christians are called by our Lord to perform acts of charity toward others, St. Pius X singles out the rich in particular to follow the precepts of the Gospel in caring for the poor and indigent. Note here that the Pope does not specify which mechanisms may or may not be used to ensure that the wealthy fulfill this obligation. While it may be said that private institutions at the local level may be best for ensuring that the least well off in society are provided the aid they need, government-run programs, fueled by equitable taxing measures, may also be justified depending on the state of need and social circumstances.
 

X. The poor should not be ashamed of their poverty, nor disdain the charity of the rich, for they should have especially in view Jesus the Redeemer, who, though He might have been born in riches, made Himself poor in order that He might ennoble poverty and enrich it with merits beyond price for heaven."

These consoling words are not intended to breed indifference toward the poor and their plight, but rather to remove the prejudice that those lacking in means are somehow second-class human beings who have been abandoned by God. At the same time, this article can be read as a reminder to all classes—rich and poor alike—of the special merits of poverty and that material wealth is not the final end of earthly existence.
 

XI. For the settlement of the social question much can be done by the capitalists and workers themselves, by means of institutions designed to provide timely aid for the needy and to bring together and unite mutually the two classes. Among these institutions are mutual aid societies, various kinds of private insurance societies, orphanages for the young, and, above all, associations among the different trades and professions."

This final article concerning capitalists and workers sets forth several suggestions for institutions which can both resolve issues between the classes and provide structures to help society’s needy in a timely manner. St. Pius X recognizes that matters will arise which cannot be resolved easily, and so the closer the different classes can be brought together with an eye toward their mutual interests, the more likely it becomes that society’s economic sphere can function smoothly with as little deleterious interruption as possible. While this ideal is still a long ways away from being actualized in our divided, atomized liberal-secular society, it is still an ideal Catholics must bear in mind when confronting concrete socio-economic disagreements.

Fin Dalla Prima Nostra is an important contribution to the Church’s social magisterium, but hardly the only one St. Pius X would make during his pontificate. Those seeking further elucidation on what Pope Sarto should consult his 1905 encyclical on Catholic Action in Italy, Il Fermo Proposito, along with the 1910 document, Notre Charge Apostolique, which bears directly on the permissible limits of Catholic political organization in liberal-democratic societies. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...