Skip to main content

Are mixed schola's a heresy?

 +
JMJ

For the purpose of this article, the schola (link) is those who sing the propers at Mass.  Meaning the Introite, Gradual, Alleluia, Tract, Sequence, Offertory, Communion in Gregorian Chant at Mass.  It is obvious that the Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Agnus Dei and Ite Missa Est can and are sung in response to the priest or cantor.

The controversy has been over whether women can sing as a schola or there can be mixed scholas who sing the propers. 

Nota Bene: I've heard mixed scholas and I find it un-balanced and offensive to my ears.  However, that it more a cultural and aesthetic perspective than a rule.  In fact, it may have its origins in some 'rules' that I received in my formative years as a member of a schola specifically:

  1. For singing the propers, if there are sufficient men capable of singing, then they should do so.
  2. Women's only scholas are legit.
  3. Mixed scholas are to be avoided.

 I've been wondering if these 'rules' have any basis in actual declarations by the Catholic Church.

In 2009 an anonymous article was posted on the New Liturgical Movement's website.  Given the heated and acrimonious debate that can occur with the introduction of change in traditional circles, I'm not surprised it was anonymous.

 Interestingly the author wrote: 

The existence of the question is largely a result of the 40-year space between the living presence of the extraordinary form and its current revival. Not having a living memory of the "old Mass" people find themselves in the position of having to "reinvent" a tradition by recourse to old documents and instructions. 

 Having attended the SSPX for 40+ years, I can attest that there was no absence of a living presence.  The question exists today because it has existed for a long long time.

The article references Musicae Sacrae by Pius XII (link), in which it is written:


73. First of all see to it that there is a good school of singers in the cathedral itself and, as far as possible, in other major churches of your dioceses. This school should serve as an example to others and influence them to carefully develop and perfect sacred chant.

74. Where it is impossible to have schools of singers or where there are not enough choir boys, it is allowed that "a group of men and women or girls, located in a place outside the sanctuary set apart for the exclusive use of this group, can sing the liturgical texts at Solemn Mass, as long as the men are completely separated from the women and girls and everything unbecoming is avoided. The Ordinary is bound in conscience in this matter."[26]

Foot Note 26 Reads: Decrees of the Sacred Congregation of Rites, No's. 3964, 4201, 4231.

Elements to note.  This is in reference to the availability of singers in the cathedral and major churches and the absence of choir boys. Why the distinction of Choir Boys?  I understand that this is in reference to the singing of polyphonic masses.  So the first conclusion is that this is what is normally called a choir and if necessary a mixed choir can be employed to sing the polyphonic mass. This however, does not speak to the schola singing the propers in gregorian chant.

 What appeared to be the exception then quickly became the rule. As the London Tablet reported on January 6, 1909: "There really would be no difficulty in bringing all Church choirs within the rule laid down by this decree: intermixed choirs of men and women are forbidden; separated choirs of men on one side and women on the other are not forbidden." And even here, the rule would only apply for propers sung by the schola exclusively where it makes the most sense to separated singing by high and low registers in any case. 

Further down the author cites the following:

By 1967, the language of the discipline had come full circle: Musicam Sacram, paragraph 22, says: "The choir can consist, according to the customs of each country and other circumstances, of either men and boys, or men and boys only, or men and women, or even, where there is a genuine case for it, of women only."

The full text of Musicam Sacram can be found here (link). Again there are distinctions to be made and a caveat of the era of the document (1967).

The now defunct Ecclesia Dei received a question:

If a men's schola is available, should a women's schola be permitted to sing the Mass In preference to a men's group?

The answer came on July 16, 2008:

If a parish is so well provided for as to have both a men's and women's schola cantorum, that would seem to be a true 'embarrassment of riches' and surely some way could be found for them both to contribute to the singing of the sacred liturgy

Note well, that it is a question of two scholas - not one mixed schola. So there is no problem having separate schola's (men and women).  There are also references to the training of separate scholas, but in this article I can't find any that discuss the acceptance and use of combined scholas, while there is approval for combined choirs.

NLM: Women and Chant 2009

In 2021, Dr.

On a practical level, unless there is some extenuating circumstance like a CMAA Sacred Music Colloquium with its pedagogical aims, it would be strange to have a men’s schola and a women’s schola dividing up tasks at the same liturgy; this is best avoided. When only men or only women are singing the propers, the worshiper can more easily forget about it and pay attention to the chants, the texts, and the ceremonies. When the two scholas go back and forth, it draws attention to the octave difference between men and women — that is, it draws attention to the performers, which is not ideal. Similarly, chant sung by men and women simultaneously is sometimes an unavoidable necessity, but chant tends to sound best in a true unison, not in organum of parallel octaves. If a chapel or parish has two scholas, a men’s and a women’s, it would be better to have one or the other sing all the propers at Mass. This is what I did at Wyoming Catholic College. The men’s schola sang multiple times a week; at a certain point, a women’s schola was created to give the women a chance to immerse themselves more fully in the chant and to give the men a much-needed rest. Here, too, a certain complementarity developed that was beneficial for all.

NLM: Are women permitted to Sing the Propers 2021

So, the conclusion I reach is that the issue is the nature of the music being sung. 

  1. If it is polyphonic  or harmony, a mixed choir is the obvious choice.  The employment of mixed or alternating male and female voices for the ordinary (Kyrie, Hymns, etc) is likewise approved.  
  2. When it is singing the propers in gregorian chant (unison) the choice of having either male or femail scholas are completely fine.
  3. With respect to mixed scholas, the pre-conciliar Popes did not seem to endorse mixed scholas to sing the propers, and Dr. K noted that the esthetic preference would argue against mixed scholas.

So, mixed scholas are not heretical 😅, and may even be necessary when there is a dearth of singers.

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...