Skip to main content

Navigating Catholic Life - Part 4: Risks and Worries: Risk Management for Life (Updated with P.S.)

 +
JMJ

 Uncertainty is a part of life, we just don't think of it much until we are surprised by something out of the ordinary.

For example, most of us don't think twice about driving a car or other vehicle.  However, the increase in speed brings with it the increase impact if there is an accident.  Only the suicidal or homicidal leave their homes with the intention to have a car 'accident'. 

First a definition: Risk is uncertainty that matters.  Anything else are just worries.

In the Catholic Life, uncertainty matters if it creates an impact on your ability to achieve your Catholic Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives (see Part 3 of this Series - Strategic Planning). At the top of the strategy is dying in a state of grace.  This matters greatly!

For example, entering a place that is an occasion of sin is definitely a risk.

The next thing to consider is the likelihood of the risk occurring and its impact. In risk management we typically plot these on a matrix or heat map like the one below.  Threats are negative risks, whereas Opportunities are positive risks.

https://industrialaudit.com/risk-mitigation/

To continue the case of entering a place where there is an occasion of sin.  Let's say that the occasion of sin is mortal, that immediately puts us in the far right "Threat" column. In this case the threat is mortal sin.  The likelihood of falling into mortal sin moves us up or down.  If there is negligible risk of falling into since then it would be in the lower right quadrant and it would be medium risk level of 0.08.  If you always fall when entering this establishment, then it is very likely that you will do so again and the risk score is 0.72. 

So what happens?  You enter the facility where historically 9 times out of 10, you commit a mortal sin and ... you fall.

Now you have placed yourself in a precarious situation, spiritually you stand on a precipice overlooking an active lava flow.  If you die in that state then you go to Hell.  Sadly, it is that simple. 

However, all is not lost, there is a secondary probability to consider that comes from a 'hazards' risk analysis - the probability of harm.  Some harm has been done because you are now in a state of mortal sin. However, as Catholics we know that this state is not permanent (i.e. damnation) unless we die.  So we need to consider the probability of dying before we get to confession. In Hazards Management this is expressed mathematically as: 

Impact (ie severity of harm) x Likelihood of harmful situation being present (ie. falling into mortal sin) x Likelihood of harm (dying in the state of mortal sin).

For the young and healthy, they will think that the probability is low. However, this is where reality sets in, just because you managed to get to confession before does not mean that the probability of death is zero.  

We are all just one accident away from eternity, the word for this is catastrophe. This is why we need to turn to God and ask for forgiveness as soon as we fall into sin, because no one promises us the next second, let alone the next sunrise.

 This is an extreme case and I will say that the young typically have a higher risk appetite than the old, however it is important to consider the risks to achieving our end goal(s) in this Catholic Life as we move through each moment.

The concept behind the strategy and risk tools is to make informed, deliberate decisions and take action accordingly. It takes practice to make good decisions, to stop, consider alternatives and then take action.  While this is a lesson from business, it is equally applicable to practising the Catholic Faith.

P^3


P.S. Another facet that I want to emphasize (again), in risk management we try to classify factors that affect us as either risks, or issues, but there are also worries and fears.

  • Risks are uncertainties that impacts your ability to achieve your goals.
  • Issues are risks that have happened and you now need to deal with the impact.
  • Worries are uncertainties that could happen but have no impact.*
  • Fears are uncertainties that are neither likely nor would have an impact.*

The first two are standard definitions.  But management worries and fears are phrases that I've heard senior management use more frequently. 

Worries are things that could happen, but have no impact on your ability to achieve your goals.  It could rain tomorrow, but in the context of eternal salvation, it will have no impact.

Fears are things that you have no reason to believe will occur or have an impact on your goals. However, fear is a subtle motivator. 

A sedevacantist  or 'resistor' may obstinately hold to a belief because they fear the decisions and actions that they would logically have to take if the belief were false.

In a group, a person who suffered trauma in their childhood may strive to create a sense of safety because people are complex and they fear disapproval.

What is the end-point here?  The end-point is that risks and issues are things that we need to deal with.  Worries and Fears are things that we need to step back and assess if they actually warrant our attention or are simply distractions from our goal.

P^3

* My definition

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome and SSPX - Version 2026 Part 2

 + JMJ Part 2 Detailed Synopsis and Timeline (ChatGPT) At this point, I took the shortcut of uploading all of my previous links and the latest SSPX and Rome links to ChatGPT. This way we’ll see how ChatGPT interprets the world as presented on the internet. P^3 Briefing Memo Subject: Rome–SSPX Relations and Planned Episcopal Consecrations (July 1, 2026) Prepared for: Ecclesial / Academic / Media Briefing Date: February 2026 Issue Overview The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has announced its intention to consecrate new bishops on July 1, 2026 , potentially without a papal mandate . The Holy See has acknowledged ongoing talks with the SSPX and stated its desire to avoid rupture, but has not granted approval nor outlined canonical consequences. The situation revives unresolved tensions dating to 1988 and raises questions about schism, authority, and doctrinal continuity. Background Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX seeks to preserve pre-Vat...

Schism

There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...

SSPX / DICI: Communiqué of the General House of the Society of St. Pius X concerning the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure.

+ JMJ The following is the communiqué of the SSPX regarding the Bishop Williamson's consecration of Fr. Faure. As a follow-up to this article ,  I would like to highlight the rationale for denouncing the consecration. Communiqué of the General House of the Society of St. Pius X concerning the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure. On March 19, 2015, Bishop Richard Williamson performed the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure at the Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Nova Friburgo, Brazil. Bishop Williamson and Fr. Faure have not been members of the Society of St. Pius X since 2012 and 2014, respectively, because of their violent criticisms of any relations with the Roman authorities. According to them, such contacts were incompatible with the apostolic work of Archbishop Lefebvre.(1) The Society of St. Pius X regrets sincerely that this spirit of opposition has led to an episcopal consecration. In 1988 Archbishop Lefebvre had c...

Bishop Huonder, SSPX in Schism? - Nope, Consecration of Holy Oils - Update 1

 + JMJ  So Bishop Huonder is in the news for two reasons.  First, his 'Testimony' concerning Pope Francis etc. This was received as a nice reinforcement by Trads (SSPX and others).  Of course, there are those that now are demanding an apostolic investigation.  Yawn, been here before.  This was predictable as other bishops who have followed the same path came to the same conclusions.  It is the way. Second, he celebrated the Chrism Mass and blessed the Holy Oils for use in the SSPX's European chapels and ceremonies.  This caused a stir amongst some Trads who are locked in one or the other statements made by either Archbishop Lefebvre or others. I received two versions of a question regarding this event: Hi Tradical Do you have any comments about doubtful oils in SSPX europe by +Huonder (NO Bishop not conditionally consecrated)? God Bless Hi Tradical Any thoughts on Huonder oil, not conditionally ordained and consecrated by SSPX bishops? God Bless M...