Skip to main content

Navigating Catholic Life - Part 4: Risks and Worries: Risk Management for Life (Updated with P.S.)

 +
JMJ

 Uncertainty is a part of life, we just don't think of it much until we are surprised by something out of the ordinary.

For example, most of us don't think twice about driving a car or other vehicle.  However, the increase in speed brings with it the increase impact if there is an accident.  Only the suicidal or homicidal leave their homes with the intention to have a car 'accident'. 

First a definition: Risk is uncertainty that matters.  Anything else are just worries.

In the Catholic Life, uncertainty matters if it creates an impact on your ability to achieve your Catholic Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives (see Part 3 of this Series - Strategic Planning). At the top of the strategy is dying in a state of grace.  This matters greatly!

For example, entering a place that is an occasion of sin is definitely a risk.

The next thing to consider is the likelihood of the risk occurring and its impact. In risk management we typically plot these on a matrix or heat map like the one below.  Threats are negative risks, whereas Opportunities are positive risks.

https://industrialaudit.com/risk-mitigation/

To continue the case of entering a place where there is an occasion of sin.  Let's say that the occasion of sin is mortal, that immediately puts us in the far right "Threat" column. In this case the threat is mortal sin.  The likelihood of falling into mortal sin moves us up or down.  If there is negligible risk of falling into since then it would be in the lower right quadrant and it would be medium risk level of 0.08.  If you always fall when entering this establishment, then it is very likely that you will do so again and the risk score is 0.72. 

So what happens?  You enter the facility where historically 9 times out of 10, you commit a mortal sin and ... you fall.

Now you have placed yourself in a precarious situation, spiritually you stand on a precipice overlooking an active lava flow.  If you die in that state then you go to Hell.  Sadly, it is that simple. 

However, all is not lost, there is a secondary probability to consider that comes from a 'hazards' risk analysis - the probability of harm.  Some harm has been done because you are now in a state of mortal sin. However, as Catholics we know that this state is not permanent (i.e. damnation) unless we die.  So we need to consider the probability of dying before we get to confession. In Hazards Management this is expressed mathematically as: 

Impact (ie severity of harm) x Likelihood of harmful situation being present (ie. falling into mortal sin) x Likelihood of harm (dying in the state of mortal sin).

For the young and healthy, they will think that the probability is low. However, this is where reality sets in, just because you managed to get to confession before does not mean that the probability of death is zero.  

We are all just one accident away from eternity, the word for this is catastrophe. This is why we need to turn to God and ask for forgiveness as soon as we fall into sin, because no one promises us the next second, let alone the next sunrise.

 This is an extreme case and I will say that the young typically have a higher risk appetite than the old, however it is important to consider the risks to achieving our end goal(s) in this Catholic Life as we move through each moment.

The concept behind the strategy and risk tools is to make informed, deliberate decisions and take action accordingly. It takes practice to make good decisions, to stop, consider alternatives and then take action.  While this is a lesson from business, it is equally applicable to practising the Catholic Faith.

P^3


P.S. Another facet that I want to emphasize (again), in risk management we try to classify factors that affect us as either risks, or issues, but there are also worries and fears.

  • Risks are uncertainties that impacts your ability to achieve your goals.
  • Issues are risks that have happened and you now need to deal with the impact.
  • Worries are uncertainties that could happen but have no impact.*
  • Fears are uncertainties that are neither likely nor would have an impact.*

The first two are standard definitions.  But management worries and fears are phrases that I've heard senior management use more frequently. 

Worries are things that could happen, but have no impact on your ability to achieve your goals.  It could rain tomorrow, but in the context of eternal salvation, it will have no impact.

Fears are things that you have no reason to believe will occur or have an impact on your goals. However, fear is a subtle motivator. 

A sedevacantist  or 'resistor' may obstinately hold to a belief because they fear the decisions and actions that they would logically have to take if the belief were false.

In a group, a person who suffered trauma in their childhood may strive to create a sense of safety because people are complex and they fear disapproval.

What is the end-point here?  The end-point is that risks and issues are things that we need to deal with.  Worries and Fears are things that we need to step back and assess if they actually warrant our attention or are simply distractions from our goal.

P^3

* My definition

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

 + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...

News Roundup: April 30, 2026

 + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

 + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...