Skip to main content

Navigating Catholic Life - Part 4: Risks and Worries: Risk Management for Life (Updated with P.S.)

 +
JMJ

 Uncertainty is a part of life, we just don't think of it much until we are surprised by something out of the ordinary.

For example, most of us don't think twice about driving a car or other vehicle.  However, the increase in speed brings with it the increase impact if there is an accident.  Only the suicidal or homicidal leave their homes with the intention to have a car 'accident'. 

First a definition: Risk is uncertainty that matters.  Anything else are just worries.

In the Catholic Life, uncertainty matters if it creates an impact on your ability to achieve your Catholic Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives (see Part 3 of this Series - Strategic Planning). At the top of the strategy is dying in a state of grace.  This matters greatly!

For example, entering a place that is an occasion of sin is definitely a risk.

The next thing to consider is the likelihood of the risk occurring and its impact. In risk management we typically plot these on a matrix or heat map like the one below.  Threats are negative risks, whereas Opportunities are positive risks.

https://industrialaudit.com/risk-mitigation/

To continue the case of entering a place where there is an occasion of sin.  Let's say that the occasion of sin is mortal, that immediately puts us in the far right "Threat" column. In this case the threat is mortal sin.  The likelihood of falling into mortal sin moves us up or down.  If there is negligible risk of falling into since then it would be in the lower right quadrant and it would be medium risk level of 0.08.  If you always fall when entering this establishment, then it is very likely that you will do so again and the risk score is 0.72. 

So what happens?  You enter the facility where historically 9 times out of 10, you commit a mortal sin and ... you fall.

Now you have placed yourself in a precarious situation, spiritually you stand on a precipice overlooking an active lava flow.  If you die in that state then you go to Hell.  Sadly, it is that simple. 

However, all is not lost, there is a secondary probability to consider that comes from a 'hazards' risk analysis - the probability of harm.  Some harm has been done because you are now in a state of mortal sin. However, as Catholics we know that this state is not permanent (i.e. damnation) unless we die.  So we need to consider the probability of dying before we get to confession. In Hazards Management this is expressed mathematically as: 

Impact (ie severity of harm) x Likelihood of harmful situation being present (ie. falling into mortal sin) x Likelihood of harm (dying in the state of mortal sin).

For the young and healthy, they will think that the probability is low. However, this is where reality sets in, just because you managed to get to confession before does not mean that the probability of death is zero.  

We are all just one accident away from eternity, the word for this is catastrophe. This is why we need to turn to God and ask for forgiveness as soon as we fall into sin, because no one promises us the next second, let alone the next sunrise.

 This is an extreme case and I will say that the young typically have a higher risk appetite than the old, however it is important to consider the risks to achieving our end goal(s) in this Catholic Life as we move through each moment.

The concept behind the strategy and risk tools is to make informed, deliberate decisions and take action accordingly. It takes practice to make good decisions, to stop, consider alternatives and then take action.  While this is a lesson from business, it is equally applicable to practising the Catholic Faith.

P^3


P.S. Another facet that I want to emphasize (again), in risk management we try to classify factors that affect us as either risks, or issues, but there are also worries and fears.

  • Risks are uncertainties that impacts your ability to achieve your goals.
  • Issues are risks that have happened and you now need to deal with the impact.
  • Worries are uncertainties that could happen but have no impact.*
  • Fears are uncertainties that are neither likely nor would have an impact.*

The first two are standard definitions.  But management worries and fears are phrases that I've heard senior management use more frequently. 

Worries are things that could happen, but have no impact on your ability to achieve your goals.  It could rain tomorrow, but in the context of eternal salvation, it will have no impact.

Fears are things that you have no reason to believe will occur or have an impact on your goals. However, fear is a subtle motivator. 

A sedevacantist  or 'resistor' may obstinately hold to a belief because they fear the decisions and actions that they would logically have to take if the belief were false.

In a group, a person who suffered trauma in their childhood may strive to create a sense of safety because people are complex and they fear disapproval.

What is the end-point here?  The end-point is that risks and issues are things that we need to deal with.  Worries and Fears are things that we need to step back and assess if they actually warrant our attention or are simply distractions from our goal.

P^3

* My definition

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX Transfers

+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...