LifeSite News has been steadfast in its campaign about morally tainted vaccines.
There's only one problem, in their zeal, they've made a critical departure from the moral theology of the Catholic Church regarding the cooperation with evil.
The leveraging of celebrity Catholics doesn't change this one whit.
The departure is that they seem to believe there exists a moral link between the cell line used and all the preceding murders / feticides that occurred prior and since then.
This is false.
When someone receives a morally tainted vaccine, they cooperate remotely in the evil of the murder of the baby whose cells were used in the production of the vaccine.
In the case of HEK-293 and PER-C.6, the cell lines are derived from one baby each.
There is no moral link between the person inoculated and the other murders.
The best analogy I could come up with is that if a person is a serial killer and sells you one of his victims watches, you have benefited from the murder of that specific person. Not all of his victims.
So while the methods used in the murder of the babies are wide, various and horrendous, it doesn't change the fact that:
- We are cooperating in the evil of a murder if the morally tainted vaccines employed tainted cell lines. For most cell lines this is one baby.
- This cooperation is remote and permitted with a list of obligations.
- The degree of remoteness is even greater for vaccines where tainted cell lines were used only for testing in the development stage.
- The present pandemic and other graves reasons render the use licit.
- The recourse to shock media statement such as "Archbishop Viganò: Vaccines made with fetal tissue are a ‘human sacrifice of innocent victims offered to Satan" are manipulative methods unworthy of Catholics.
P^3
Comments
Post a Comment