Skip to main content

Count Capponi - RIP

+
JMJ

I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness.

I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many.

This part of the article caught my attention:
Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.”
I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality.

Of course, liberals don't want to exercise their liberality with Catholics who want to remain Catholic.

:-)

P^3

Courtesy of Rorate-Caeli

Count Neri Capponi, Defender of the Traditional Mass, Requiescat in pace

Count Neri Capponi (left) with Michael Davies at a FIUV meeting
A dear friend and reader of Rorate Caeli alerted us to the fact that a great traditionalist of the 20th century, Count Neri Capponi, died yesterday, on the feast of St. Lucy. Requiem aeternam dona ei, Domine, et lux perpetua luceat ei. Requiescat in pace.
Neri Capponi, from a venerable Italian noble family, spent many decades teaching at the University of Florence and serving the archbishop of Florence on the marriage tribunal, where he was a judge.  Well into his 70s he was handling marriage cases, as a glance at his desk at Palazzo Capponi would illustrate. He was also credentialed to plead before the Roman Rota.  
Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” 
Almost alone in the world, this eminent canonist and legal scholar argued lucidly and strenuously that the old Mass had never been juridically abrogated. He was arguing the position of Summorum Pontificum long before it was a twinkle in the eye of a pope. I remember reading articles by him in early issues of Latin Mass magazine and wondering if he was right about these things. In 2007, Pope Benedict XVI vindicated his claims, using almost identical words.
Capponi’s mother was British and he spoke fluent English. He served also as informal counsel to Chuck Wilson’s St. Joseph Foundation, which defended the rights of laity, mostly in the USA, who were being treated unfairly, typically for the “sin” of orthodoxy. Under the auspices of the St. Joseph Foundation, he delivered a lecture entitled “Times of Crisis, Times for Faith” in six American cities in 1995. A transcript is available at EWTN online. This article reads as if it were written not 23 years ago, but rather just yesterday. In the Introduction he writes:
God has entrusted His most precious gift to us, His Church, not to angels but to men, to us sinners; all of us, be we pope, bishop, priest or layman. Therefore, we, with our sins and shortcomings act upon the Church as the executioners acted on the physical body of Our Lord. This applies to the shepherds as well as to the sheep. Notwithstanding all this, Our Lord has guaranteed that His Church will never completely fail; but she has suffered, is suffering and will suffer from those two evils which beset every society governed by men; human malice and human error.
Having summarized what he considered the four greatest historical trials of Christianity, Capponi comes around to the postconciliar crisis and observes:
When asked why I believe the crisis we now face is worse than Arianism, I give these reasons: (a) The principal vehicle of the faith, the liturgy, was untouched by the Arian crisis; (b) whereas the Arian crisis was precipitated and sustained by the intervention of secular power, the post Vatican II crisis comes from within the Church and is therefore more difficult to fight; (c) in the fourth century, Pope Liberius finally signed the excommunication of St. Athanasius under duress—in the twentieth century Pope Paul VI was admittedly taken in and hoodwinked by his misguided optimism, but there was no duress; (d) the present crisis is not only one of faith but of morals as well. In addition, today not only one dogma, albeit a very important one, is denied as with Arianism, but all dogmas, be it even the existence of a personal God!
Count Capponi leaves his beloved wife, Flavia, and four children as well as seven grandchildren.  One of his sons, severely disabled, he visited practically daily at the Catholic institution caring for him. 
May Our Lord grant him eternal rest and a reward for his labors for the Catholic Church.
Capponi (right)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Battle Joy

+ JMJ I was listening to a Cd of John Vennari on Battle Joy ( Recapture the Flag: Dedication and Battle Joy - by John Vennari ) and it really captures a key point that Catholics (Traditional and otherwise labelled) need to adopt. We should see this conflict as a chance to prove our mettle for our King and to earn our unending reward.  As veterans we'll be able to talk about the old battles in which we fought and the honour we gained in fighting for our King! Attached is a preview of course that, although secular, contains some of the elements of Battle Joy. P^3 https://www.coursera.org/learn/war/lecture/VDwfk/the-joy-of-battle

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...

A Response to Novus Ordo Watch - A Catholic Thinker

+ JMJ Strike the shepherd and the sheep will scatter. I once heard that Sedevacantists and Neo-Conservatives are two sides of the same coin. Both have a mis-perception of the infallibility of the Pope, Bishops and Church. Consequently, one will see the bad actions of the Pope and conclude that he can't be Pope.  The other will see the bad actions of the Pope and conclude that the bad actions must actually be good since he is Pope. The problem is that both are altering their perception of the reality  in order to support their beliefs. When the beliefs are strongly held (at the level of cultural assumptions ) the is no guarantee that rational argumentation will follow. The rebuttal by 'A Catholic Thinker' exposes the flaws in the criticisms of  John Salza's but does more than that: It highlights the extents to which humans will go to preserve their beliefs. How do you deal with a person with such strongly held beliefs? In my experience, the fir...

News Roundup: February 2025

 + JMJ  As expected the pace of life has picked up after the slight and I mean very slight, lull after Christmas. Against the continual and persevering crisis of the Catholic Church we have the Death of Bishop Williamson. Suffice to say that, like many others, I knew Bishop Williamson. I have met with him privately to discuss some rumours that I'd heard from former seminarians, attended both retreats and Doctrinal Sessions at Winona, and on one occasion even had the privilege of driving him to the airport. I saw the breach coming in 2009 and started praying for him to not do, frankly, something stupid.  Yes, I was thinking about the time that he was banned from Canada for comments on the Holocaust. Then three years later we had his expulsion.  I've written criticizing Bishop Williamson's positions on numerous topics (see  Collection - Resistance and Resistors     ) and while the 'resistance' is now set in its erroneous ways, now is the time to pr...