Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 13

+
JMJ

December 13

We have been talking about the time of the Judges.

The Judges were leaders who came to the help of Israel when there was great need. They united the people to fight against their enemies. At other times, each of the twelve tribes ran their own affairs. The book of Judges ends with the words, “In those days there was no king in Israel: but every one did that which seemed right to himself.” (Judges 21:24)

Now we come to the birth of Samuel.

Samuel’s mother, Anna had wanted to have a baby for a long time. She promised God that if He sent her a little boy, she would give him to the Lord all the days of his life and would never cut his hair (according to the Nazarite law…just like Samson).

God heard Anna’s prayer and sent her a son. When Samuel was old enough, Anna gave Samuel to Heli, the high priest and judge, saying:

“My heart hath rejoiced in the Lord, and my horn is exalted in my God:
my mouth is enlarged over my enemies: because I have joyed in my salvation. There is none holy as the Lord is: for there is no other beside Thee…The bow of the mighty is overcome, and the weak are girt with strength…The Lord maketh poor and maketh rich, he humbleth and He exalteth..” (1 Kings Chapter 2)

Our Lady knew the Scriptures well.
No doubt she had the canticle of Anna in mind when she uttered her own Magnificat;

“My soul doth magnify the Lord. And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
… Because He that is mighty, hath done great things to me; and holy is His name…He hath put down the mighty from their seat, and hath exalted the humble…He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich He hath sent empty away.” (Luke Chapter 1)

So Samuel lived with Heli and helped with the duties of a priest.
The time came, however, when God was not pleased with Heli, because his sons were wicked and Heli did not correct them.

And one night, God called Samuel, and Samuel answered, “Speak, Lord for Thy servant heareth.” (1 Kings 3:10) “And the Lord said to Samuel…In that day I will raise up against Heli all the things I have spoken concerning his house…For I have foretold unto him, that I will judge his house forever, for iniquity, because he knew that his sons did wickedly, and did not chastise them.” (1 Kings 3:11-13)

At that time, the Philistines were still enemies of the Israelites. There was a great battle, and the Israelites were losing so they called for the Ark of the Covenant to be brought to battle in order to save them.

So the sons of Heli brought the Ark, but they were killed in battle and the Ark was taken by the Philistines.
When Heli heard the news, he was overcome with shock and died.

The Philistines took the Ark and brought it into the temple of their idol, Dagon.
And the next morning, the Philistines found the idol lying face down before the Ark.
They set the statue up again, but the next morning, they again found the statue lying on the ground, this time with its head and hands cut off! (Remember Genesis 3:15… “she shall crush thy head”)

Wherever the Philistines brought the Ark, God punished them with sickness. Finally they sent the Ark back to the Israelites.

Samuel was now the priest, prophet and judge of the people.
When the Ark returned, Samuel offered sacrifice to the Lord in thanksgiving. The Philistines stopped attacking and there was peace for a time.
Years went by, and Samuel grew old. Up until then, God had ruled the people of Israel Himself; choosing the judges who would lead them in time of need.

Now the Israelites decided they wanted a change. They asked for a king.
God warned His people (through Samuel) that they would not always like having a king rule over them, but He let them have their way.

So we come to a new period in Old Testament history: the period of the Kings.
This period would last 120 years. There were 3 kings during this time; King Saul, King David and King Solomon. Each would reign 40 years.
We will talk about King Saul first.

Saul was a great big tall man, head and shoulders taller than any other man in Israel.
One day Saul was out looking for his father’s donkeys. Presently he came to the town where Samuel was staying, and Saul and his servant went to visit Samuel.

When Saul entered, God spoke to the prophet Samuel, telling him that Saul was to be king. Samuel called all the men of Israel together, and told them that God was going to give them a king. Everyone drew lots to determine who should be king and the lot fell to Saul.

At first Saul was a good king and defended his people from the Philistines, but after a time he began to grow proud. Finally came the day when Saul disobeyed God and God rejected Saul as king.

Tomorrow we will see what happened next




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...