Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 9

+
JMJ

December 9


The Israelites lived in the desert for 40 years. As time went on, Moses’ sister died then his older brother Aaron died.

Then the Israelites began to complain that they were tired of eating manna all the time!

Can you believe it? Here God makes a miracle every day to feed them and they complain they’re getting tired of it.

When you read the Old Testament, it seems that the Israelites were always complaining of one thing or another, but really, we are just as bad sometimes. We have the Holy Eucharist, an infinitely greater miracle to feed our souls every day. Some saints have died from pure joy after receiving Our Lord. We have such a treasure, yet we focus on the little things in our daily lives that don't go just as we would like.

Whenever the Hebrews needed something, God provided for them, but in this case they were just whining, so to correct them, God sent poisonous snakes. Many who were bitten by those snakes died. The people called to Moses to help them. God told Moses, “Make a brazen serpent, and set it up for a sign: whosoever being struck shall look on it shall live.” (Num 21:8)

That brazen serpent is a symbol or type of Our Lord, who was lifted up on the cross so that we might be healed from the effects of sin.

Now we come to a really neat part of history. This is a true story of a talking animal!
The story is about Balaam’s talking donkey and is found in Numbers chapters 22-23.


While the Israelites were still in the desert, other kings sometimes attacked them, but with God’s help, the Israelites won every battle.
Finally the people of Israel reached the plains of Moab, just across the river Jordan from Jericho. The time had come for them to enter the promised land.
King Balac was the king of Moab. He had heard how strong the Israelites were and he was afraid.
King Balac sent for a pagan soothsayer named Balaam to come and curse the Israelites but God spoke to Balaam, warning him not to curse His chosen people.

Balaam sent a message telling King Balac that he could not curse the Israelites, but the king insisted he come to him anyway, so Balaam saddled his little donkey and set out to see the king. On the way, a huge angel with a sword appeared on the road ahead, but only Balaam’s donkey could see it. The donkey was afraid of that angel and she went off into the field to get away. Balaam got angry and began to beat the little donkey, roughly forcing her back onto the road.
Later on, the angel appeared again at a narrow place between two walls. Trying to go around the angel, the donkey squeezed up near one wall and squished Balaam’s foot. Again, Balaam got angry and began to beat the donkey.

A third time the angel appeared. This time there was no place for the donkey to go so she fell down and would not move. Baalam started beating the donkey once more. Then God performed a miracle and the donkey spoke! The donkey said, “Why are you beating me?”. Balaam answered, “Because thou hast deserved it, and hast served me ill” (Num 22:29)

The donkey politely reminded Balaam that she had always been a good donkey. Then God allowed Balaam to see the angel. The angel must have been VERY big and powerful because Balaam fell down and hid his face. The angel informed Balaam that the donkey had saved his life, for if he had come close enough, the angel would have killed him.

Balaam knew he had done wrong by setting off to see the king. He offered to go back home, but the angel told Balaam he could go and see King Balac, only he must be careful not to curse the Israelites.
When Balaam got to the king, 3 times King Balac sent Balaam to curse the Israelites and 3 times Balaam blessed them instead. Each time the king got angry but Balaam just said, “I told you I wouldn't curse them!”

Isn’t that amazing history!

(I hope Balaam apologized to the donkey.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Look Back: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976

 + JMJ  Looking back is important to understand why we are where we are in this crisis. Courtesy of RemnantNewsPaper  P^3 FOR THE FIRST TIME ONLINE: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976 Written by  Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre Introduction by Michael J. Matt More than forty years ago—during the disastrous reign of Pope Paul VI, the latest candidate for a Vatican-issued Halo Award, by the way—my father, Walter L. Matt, organized the first large scale public reception in the U.S. for the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. It was held at the Radisson South Hotel, Minneapolis, on Tuesday, May 12, 1976, and its stated purpose was to assist the Archbishop in gaining a stronger foothold for the Society of St. Pius X in the States during the unprecedented crisis Blessed Pope Paul had helped unleash on the Church. On that occasion Archbishop Lefebvre delivered ...

The myth of the Hermeneutic of Continuity - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ Interestingly the complete acceptance of the Second Vatican Council (without reservations) is required of the SSPX. Just when people are starting to wonder how it came to this! Courtesy of Rorate Caeli P^3

"Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ In prep for yet another attack on Catholic Dogma, Doctrine and Morals, I'd like to point out an excellent article posted on Rorate earlier this year:  "Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli . To date my only real reaction the 'Theology of the Body' has been that what little I read doesn't 'feel right'.  The more specific term for this sensation is Cognitive Dissonance or Cultural Dissonance. In short, what I read of the basic tenets of 'Theology of the Body' seemed to contradict I believed about the Catholic Church's teaching on the purpose of marriage.  The explanations that I received from 'modern' Catholics, didn't do anything to allay my concerns. This article goes to the heart of why it didn't feel right.

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...