Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 2

+
JMJ

December 2

Adam and Eve lived many years and had A LOT of children, but 3 are mentioned especially. The first were Cain and Abel. Cain was a farmer and Abel was a shepherd. They both made sacrifices to God. God accepted the sacrifice of Abel because he offered it with a pure heart. Cain was jealous and killed Abel. From then on, Cain was cursed by God.

Many years later, when Adam was 130, he had another son named Seth. Seth is important because his descendant was Noe. Since Noe and his family were the only people spared in the Great Flood, we are all children of Adam, Seth and Noe.

Seth had 2 other special descendants before Noe. Their names were; Henoch and his son Mathusala. Henoch was the great great great grandson of Seth.

In Genesis 5:21-24 we read that Henoch lived on earth 365 years. Then God did something special. God took him away and he was seen no more! Henoch did not die. The Apocalyse says that he will come in the last days with Elias (who also was taken up by God) to oppose the Antichrist and then they will die.

Henoch’s son, Mathusala is famous for being the man with the longest life mentioned in the Bible. He lived 969 years (Gen 5:27)

Now we come to Noe.

In the back of the Douay-Rheims Bible, you will find an historical and chonological index of the Old Testament. There it states that 1056 years after creation, Noah was born.

The Bible says that Adam lived 930 years so he died just 126 years before Noe was born. Adam’s son, Seth would live 4 more years after the birth of Noah, his descendant.

At that time, there was so much wickedness in the world, God decided to send a world-wide flood.

God told Noah to build an ark for his family and all the animals God would send.

It took Noah years to build the ark. Most likely, the other people laughed at Noah. It probably seemed impossible to them that a flood would happen, but Noah kept right on building.

We can pray to Noah for help when we feel as if we are all alone in obeying God’s laws.
God will reward us for all eternity if we are faithful to Him here on earth.

Noah worked hard and after many years the Ark was ready. By then, even old Mathusala had died. Of all those who lived on the earth, only 8 people were saved; Noah, his wife, his 3 sons and their wives. Noah was 600 years old when the flood came; 1656 years after the creation of Adam.

After the flood, Noah made a sacrifice to God. Throughout the Old Testament, there is an emphasis on sacrifice; a need for man to give back to God; to dedicate to God the best that men had.

Sacrifices were offered to God for 4 reasons;

-To adore God   

-To thank God for His many graces  

-To try to make up for having offended the good God. (reparation)  

-Finally, to ask God for the things they needed (petition)

In fact, these are the same reasons why we offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass today

God gave Noah a sign in the sky of His promise to never send a worldwide flood again. This sign was the rainbow. Every time we see a beautiful rainbow in the sky, it is a reminder to us that God keeps His promises.

Noe is a type, or prefigurement (symbol) of Christ;

God cleansed the world by the flood, just as Our Lord cleanses us through the waters of baptism.

Noe was the father of the new human race just as Our Lord is the “new Adam”, and through His grace we become “sons of God” with God’s own life in our souls.

Noe built the Ark to save his family just as Our Lord founded the Catholic Church to help us get to heaven. The Ark that saved people from the flood is a prefigurement of the Church, which Christ founded to save souls.

God told Noah and his sons to increase and multiply. Each one of us are descendants of Noah and his sons; Sem, Ham and Japheth. The children of Sem are called Semites. They include the Chosen People of God, whom we will talk about tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...