Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 23

+
JMJ

December 23

We have seen how the Persians, under Cyrus the Great took over the Chaldean Empire. King Cyrus allowed the Jews to return to Judea,their homeland, and rebuild the Temple at Jerusalem.

The Persians went on to conquer most of the known world. They took over Egypt, putting an end to the dynasty of the great Pharaohs.

India also became a Persian province. The Persians tried to take over Greece as well, but they were defeated at the battle of Marathon. (This victory was remembered by the Greeks with the Marathon races.)


The Persians ruled for many years, but eventually their empire came to an end. A young man named Alexander the Great led armies out of Greece and in a few short years, he took over the civilized world.

In 331 B.C. the Greeks took over Judea and Judea became a Greek province. Many Jews moved to Alexandria in Egypt and to other parts of the Greek Empire (This spreading out of the Jews all over the world is called the “Diaspora” which is Greek for “Dispersion”.)

Greek became the world language. At Alexandria in Egypt, 70 Jews worked to translate the Bible into Greek. This translation was called the “Septuagint” (from the Latin, “septuaginta” which means 70.)

The Greek Septuagint was a factor that the Catholic Church used to decide which books belonged to the Old Testament (The list of books which have been inspired by God is called the Canon of Scripture)

Alexander the Great died in the year 323 B.C. After his death, Alexander’s generals and later on, their families fought for power. 2 families in particular; the Ptolemies of Egypt and the Seleucidae of Syria fought over Judea. The Seleucids won.

In 168 B.C., Seleucid leader Antiochus IV (also called Antiochus Epiphanes) decided to force the Jews to live like Greeks. He made a new law, forbidding the Jewish religion. He took over Jerusalem and profaned the Temple; stealing the sacred vessels and setting up an altar to the false god Zeus. He persecuted the people, destroying their homes and killing those who did not worship Greek idols.

One man stood up against Antiochus. This man was Mathathias. Mathathias and his 5 sons lived in the mountain of Modin. When the king’s men came to force everyone to sacrifice to idols, Mathathias pulled down the altar, and crying with a loud voice, said, “Every one that hath zeal for the law…let him follow me”

So the Jews formed an army under Mathathias, and they fought Antiochus, tearing down his altars.

But Mathathias was a very old man. He died shortly after when he was 146 years old, and his oldest son, Judas Machabeus continued the fight against the Seleucids. In December, 165 B.C. Judas (or Judah) Machabeus led the Jews into Jerusalem.

Throwing out the idols, he purified the Temple, and the small amount of good oil they had, by God's miracle lasted 8 days. The Jews remember this event with the festival of Hanukkah.Antiochus IV also died, but other Seleucid leaders continued the battle.

While all this was happening, there was another power rising; the power of Rome.

Judas Machabeus heard of these Romans; that they ruled with justice and fairness, and he sent men to Rome to make an alliance with them. The Jews promised to help the Romans fight their battles and the Romans promised to help the Jews.

During this time, the Bible tells of another family; a mother and her 7 sons. The Greek Seleucids tortured and killed each one of them because they would not deny God. The family remained steadfast and firm to the end, encouraging one another. (2 Maccabees chapter 7)

Judas Machabeus died in battle, but his brothers took up the fight.

Now we come to the end of the Old Testament.


The Old Testament ends with the victory over Nicanor who was sent by the Seleucid king to fight the Jews. The head of Nicanor was cut off (!) and hung on top of the castle as a sign of God’s help.

Today’s O Antiphon is, “O Emmanuel”

"O God With Us our King and Lawgiver, the Expectation of the nations, and their Savior: come and save us, O Lord our God."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...