Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 18

+
JMJ

December 18

Yesterday we talked about how the Assyrians took over the kingdom of Israel. Israel, you remember, was made up of the 10 tribes of Israel in the north, who broke away during the reign of King Solomon's son, Roboam.

Because the Temple of Jerusalem was in the kingdom of Judea in the south, however, the other tribes would not go there to worship as God commanded. Instead they set up false gods at the places of Bethel and Dan. Over the years, God sent prophets to bring His people back, but in the end, the Assyrians took over Israel.
Not all Israelites worshiped false gods, though.

At the same time that the Assyrians were taking over Israel (722 B.C.), there lived a man named Tobias. He was of the Hebrew tribe and city of Nephtali. Tobias did not worship the golden calves at Bethel and Dan. He went to worship God in the Temple of Jerusalem instead.

It says in the book of Tobias that, “When he was made captive…even in his captivity, forsook not the way of truth” (Tob 1:2)

When they captured Israel, the Assyrians made Tobias and his people move to the city of Ninive. Tobias comforted and encouraged the others. He gave food and clothes to those who had none. He took the bodies of those who were killed and buried them during the night, at risk of his own life.

One day, while Tobias was sleeping, some stuff from a bird’s nest fell into his eye and made him blind. The Bible says that God allowed this to happen so that Tobias might give an example of patience, just like Job.

Tobias remained faithful to God saying, “we are the children of saints, and look for that life which God will give to those that never change their faith from Him.” (Tob 2:18)

People in the world today are troubled by the notion of suffering. They wonder what it is all for, but God asks us to trust Him. It doesn’t really matter what happens to us in this life, as long as we are faithful to our Father. Our test is so short here on earth, and our reward for trusting Him is for all eternity.

The saints, in fact went one step further! They knew that we are here on earth in order to serve God through the salvation of souls by our prayers, sufferings and all that we do, united to the sufferings of Our Lord as part of the communion of saints.
As St. Paul said, “Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ , in my flesh, for his body, which is the church” (Col 1:24)

Often we think of the day as being “our day”. We make plans and ask God to bless them; giving His stamp of approval. When things go wrong, we get frustrated. We forget that our day does not belong to us, but rather to God. He has plans for us too. He made us for those plans, and gave us just the right mix of qualities to fulfill those plans. We can look at each day as an adventure with our heavenly Father!

God had a very special plan for Tobias also. Because of his sufferings, Tobias could not work. His family became very poor. Tobias had a son, also named Tobias. Tobias told his son to collect some money owed him by a man who lived far away.

God sent the angel Raphael to help young Tobias on his journey. On the way, they caught a fish and Raphael told young Tobias to keep the gall of the fish. Later on, they met a woman named Sara, whom young Tobias eventually married, according to God’s plan. 
The trip was a success. The money was collected and they all returned home.
When they arrived, Raphael instructed Tobias to anoint his father’s eyes with the fish’s gall. His father was healed and the family thanked Raphael for all he had done. Then Raphael told them “I am the angel Raphael, one of the seven, who stand before the Lord…because thou wast acceptable to God, it was necessary that temptation should prove thee. When I was with you, I was there by the will of God: bless ye him, and sing praises to Him.” (Tob 12)

The O Antiphon for today is “O Adonai”
"O Leader of the house of Israel, who didst appear to Moses in the burning bush, and didst give him the law on Sinai: come and redeem us with Thine outstretched arm."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Look Back: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976

 + JMJ  Looking back is important to understand why we are where we are in this crisis. Courtesy of RemnantNewsPaper  P^3 FOR THE FIRST TIME ONLINE: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976 Written by  Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre Introduction by Michael J. Matt More than forty years ago—during the disastrous reign of Pope Paul VI, the latest candidate for a Vatican-issued Halo Award, by the way—my father, Walter L. Matt, organized the first large scale public reception in the U.S. for the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. It was held at the Radisson South Hotel, Minneapolis, on Tuesday, May 12, 1976, and its stated purpose was to assist the Archbishop in gaining a stronger foothold for the Society of St. Pius X in the States during the unprecedented crisis Blessed Pope Paul had helped unleash on the Church. On that occasion Archbishop Lefebvre delivered ...

The myth of the Hermeneutic of Continuity - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ Interestingly the complete acceptance of the Second Vatican Council (without reservations) is required of the SSPX. Just when people are starting to wonder how it came to this! Courtesy of Rorate Caeli P^3

"Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ In prep for yet another attack on Catholic Dogma, Doctrine and Morals, I'd like to point out an excellent article posted on Rorate earlier this year:  "Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli . To date my only real reaction the 'Theology of the Body' has been that what little I read doesn't 'feel right'.  The more specific term for this sensation is Cognitive Dissonance or Cultural Dissonance. In short, what I read of the basic tenets of 'Theology of the Body' seemed to contradict I believed about the Catholic Church's teaching on the purpose of marriage.  The explanations that I received from 'modern' Catholics, didn't do anything to allay my concerns. This article goes to the heart of why it didn't feel right.

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...