Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 18

+
JMJ

December 18

Yesterday we talked about how the Assyrians took over the kingdom of Israel. Israel, you remember, was made up of the 10 tribes of Israel in the north, who broke away during the reign of King Solomon's son, Roboam.

Because the Temple of Jerusalem was in the kingdom of Judea in the south, however, the other tribes would not go there to worship as God commanded. Instead they set up false gods at the places of Bethel and Dan. Over the years, God sent prophets to bring His people back, but in the end, the Assyrians took over Israel.
Not all Israelites worshiped false gods, though.

At the same time that the Assyrians were taking over Israel (722 B.C.), there lived a man named Tobias. He was of the Hebrew tribe and city of Nephtali. Tobias did not worship the golden calves at Bethel and Dan. He went to worship God in the Temple of Jerusalem instead.

It says in the book of Tobias that, “When he was made captive…even in his captivity, forsook not the way of truth” (Tob 1:2)

When they captured Israel, the Assyrians made Tobias and his people move to the city of Ninive. Tobias comforted and encouraged the others. He gave food and clothes to those who had none. He took the bodies of those who were killed and buried them during the night, at risk of his own life.

One day, while Tobias was sleeping, some stuff from a bird’s nest fell into his eye and made him blind. The Bible says that God allowed this to happen so that Tobias might give an example of patience, just like Job.

Tobias remained faithful to God saying, “we are the children of saints, and look for that life which God will give to those that never change their faith from Him.” (Tob 2:18)

People in the world today are troubled by the notion of suffering. They wonder what it is all for, but God asks us to trust Him. It doesn’t really matter what happens to us in this life, as long as we are faithful to our Father. Our test is so short here on earth, and our reward for trusting Him is for all eternity.

The saints, in fact went one step further! They knew that we are here on earth in order to serve God through the salvation of souls by our prayers, sufferings and all that we do, united to the sufferings of Our Lord as part of the communion of saints.
As St. Paul said, “Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ , in my flesh, for his body, which is the church” (Col 1:24)

Often we think of the day as being “our day”. We make plans and ask God to bless them; giving His stamp of approval. When things go wrong, we get frustrated. We forget that our day does not belong to us, but rather to God. He has plans for us too. He made us for those plans, and gave us just the right mix of qualities to fulfill those plans. We can look at each day as an adventure with our heavenly Father!

God had a very special plan for Tobias also. Because of his sufferings, Tobias could not work. His family became very poor. Tobias had a son, also named Tobias. Tobias told his son to collect some money owed him by a man who lived far away.

God sent the angel Raphael to help young Tobias on his journey. On the way, they caught a fish and Raphael told young Tobias to keep the gall of the fish. Later on, they met a woman named Sara, whom young Tobias eventually married, according to God’s plan. 
The trip was a success. The money was collected and they all returned home.
When they arrived, Raphael instructed Tobias to anoint his father’s eyes with the fish’s gall. His father was healed and the family thanked Raphael for all he had done. Then Raphael told them “I am the angel Raphael, one of the seven, who stand before the Lord…because thou wast acceptable to God, it was necessary that temptation should prove thee. When I was with you, I was there by the will of God: bless ye him, and sing praises to Him.” (Tob 12)

The O Antiphon for today is “O Adonai”
"O Leader of the house of Israel, who didst appear to Moses in the burning bush, and didst give him the law on Sinai: come and redeem us with Thine outstretched arm."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...