Cynical Resistors 2a - Introduction and forming good judgements

JMJ

As noted in the original cynical-resistors post, a person by the pseudonym of Gerard is finding fault with the Fatima apparitions. He has a tendency to take the shotgun approach to theology in that he takes aim at a general topic and peppers it with bb's.

Gerard's attacks on the Fatima apparition are an interesting example of what happens when one simply rejects in an off-hand manner authority. In short, Gerard has set himself up as an authority by simply rejecting elements that don't pass his smell test.

In dealing with cultural issues, the smell test can be useful as well as dangerous. The smell test is based more on the sub-conscious than the conscious mind. The sub-conscious, because of its neural access points, communicates with the conscious mind via emotions. So when something doesn't feel right and you can't pinpoint a specific rational reason, it is the sub-conscious mind that has recognized a pattern and is providing feedback to the stimuli. These 'feelings' are sometimes referred to as 'gut feel' and 'intuition'.

In emergent issues, the sub-conscious is critical to forming good judgements and to react quickly in an appropriate manner. However, in order to form these good judgements, the sub-conscious mind needs to be trained. That is the reason for intense training in boot-camps and martial arts programs. The constant repetition is training the sub-conscious mind, not to mention that some functions of your brain actually extends into your spinal column.

Case in point, in 2012 or there about, I read a statement by Pope Benedict XVI and immediately thought that it sounded modernist. I left it at that until a few weeks later, I heard Bishop Fellay make the same statement.

This statement, that I thought was modernist, by Bishop Fellay was inconsistent with my belief that he was that paragon of Catholicity.

If I was a resistor I would have thrown Bishop Fellay under the bus, stopped attending the SSPX Mass etc.

Fortunately, I am not a resistor, and recognizing that there was an inconsistency, I proceeded to lookup the statement in various reference texts. I was surprised to find that Pope Benedict XVI was quoting the Council of Trent. Therefore, in submission to authority I changed my incorrect belief and 'dissonance' was reduced.

This is a key difference between myself and 'resistors', I will actually look at the facts and if my belief is incorrect, I will align it with reality.

Lesson: The smell test is good for a first check and in emergent situations, but unless one has trained their sub-conscious in a particular area, their first emotional responses run the risk of being very very wrong. So when the 'gut-feel' is telling you something in non-emergent cases, it is always best to stop, think and research. It is telling your something, but you have to use your reason to validate the emotion.

P^3

Comments

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection. The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements. So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

+ JMJ An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'. Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like. No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included. I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith. While...

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience? Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making. It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX. The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience. The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members. It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

+ JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc. So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post. Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God. So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries. As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...

Tradicat

Search This Blog