Skip to main content

Cynical Resistors 2a - Introduction and forming good judgements

+
JMJ

As noted in the original cynical-resistors post, a person by the pseudonym of Gerard is finding fault with the Fatima apparitions.  He has a tendency to take the shotgun approach to theology in that he takes aim at a general topic and peppers it with bb's.



Gerard's attacks on the Fatima apparition are an interesting example of what happens when one simply rejects in an off-hand manner authority.  In short, Gerard has set himself up as an authority by simply rejecting elements that don't pass his smell test.

In dealing with cultural issues, the smell test can be useful as well as dangerous.  The smell test is based more on the sub-conscious than the conscious mind. The sub-conscious, because of its neural access points, communicates with the conscious mind via emotions.  So when something doesn't feel right and you can't pinpoint a specific rational reason, it is the sub-conscious mind that has recognized a pattern and is providing feedback to the stimuli.  These 'feelings' are sometimes referred to as 'gut feel' and 'intuition'.

In emergent issues, the sub-conscious is critical to forming good judgements and to react quickly in an appropriate manner.  However, in order to form these good judgements, the sub-conscious mind needs to be trained.  That is the reason for intense training in boot-camps and martial arts programs.  The constant repetition is training the sub-conscious mind, not to mention that some functions of your brain actually extends into your spinal column.

Case in point, in 2012 or there about, I read a statement by Pope Benedict XVI and immediately thought that it sounded modernist.  I left it at that until a few weeks later, I heard Bishop Fellay make the same statement.

This statement, that I thought was modernist, by Bishop Fellay was inconsistent with my belief that he was that paragon of Catholicity.

If I was a resistor I would have thrown Bishop Fellay under the bus, stopped attending the SSPX Mass etc.

Fortunately, I am not a resistor, and recognizing that there was an inconsistency, I proceeded to lookup the statement in various reference texts.  I was surprised to find that Pope Benedict XVI was quoting the Council of Trent.  Therefore, in submission to authority I changed my incorrect belief and 'dissonance' was reduced.

This is a key difference between myself and 'resistors', I will actually look at the facts and if my belief is incorrect, I will align it with reality.

Lesson: The smell test is good for a first check and in emergent situations, but unless one has trained their sub-conscious in a particular area, their first emotional responses run the risk of being very very wrong.  So when the 'gut-feel' is telling you something in non-emergent cases, it is always best to stop, think and research.  It is telling your something, but you have to use your reason to validate the emotion.

P^3






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

Regarding Post: Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer no longer ... now Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer (Can't see this being a problem...)

 + JMJ   I've been watching the popularity of the post about Fr. Pfeiffer's attempted episcopal consecration and its continued top listing on the 'popular posts' list at the bottom of posts.  After some thought, I decided that I don't want to be responsible for anyone joining Fr. Pfeiffer's 'group', however unlikely that would be at this time. So I have reverted the article to the draft state. If anyone wants it reinstated, I would ask that they comment on this post with a rationale for reinstatement. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

Schism

There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...