Skip to main content

Breaking Down St. Thomas' Summa Article on Obedience - 1h - St. Thomas on Legitimate authority and obedience

Image
By
+
JMJ

I will be bringing this latest series to a close after this post.  

I think it has been a good deep dive into the thought of St. Thomas on obedience. I've also had the opportunity to respond to some of Gerard's objections.

So what is next for us in this crisis of the Church?

Knowing when obedience is obligatory, optional and sinful.

Practicing virtue.


P^3

Source: Blog St. Thomas Aquinas

Links to other posts in this latest series on obedience

Introduction: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article.html


Obedience as per St. Thomas: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article_23.html




DisObedience as per St. Thomas Aquinas: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article_24.html




Key Distinctions: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article_25.html




Application to the 1988 Consecrations: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article_26.html




Conclusions: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article_27.html




Objections: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article_28.html




St. Thomas on Legitimate authority and obedience: http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2017/07/breaking-down-st-thomas-summa-article_13.html





















Legitimate authority and obedience

Obedience is commanded within the limits of due observance. The duty develops according to the gradation of authorities which have power, not only over temporalities, but also over the conscience. St. Paul says, “let every soul be subject unto the higher powers, for there is no power but of God.” Therefore a Christian should obey power that is from God, but not otherwise.



Power may not stem from God for two reasons: it may be defective either in its origins or in its exercise.



Concerning the first, the defect may lie either in the personal unworthiness of the man or in some flaw in the manner of obtaining high position—violence, bribery, or some other illicit practice. The former is no bar to the possession of legitimate authority; and because the duty of obedience, it follows that subjects are bound to obey such a ruler, though as a man he is a good-for-nothing. The latter, however, is a bar, for a man who has snatched power by violence is no true superior or lord, and whoever has the ability may rightly reject him, unless perhaps the power has been subsequently legitimized by the consent of subjects or by higher authority.



The abuse of power may take two directions. Either the ruler imposes what is contrary to the purpose for which authority is instituted, for instance if he dictates vices contrary to the virtues authority is supposed to promote and sustain. In that event, not merely is a man not bound to obey, he is also bound not to obey, following the martyrs, who suffered death, rather than carry out the wicked decrees of tyrants. Or the ruler may make demands where his warrant does not run, for instance in exacting tributes to which he has no title, or something of the sort. In such cases a subject is not bound to obey, neither is he bound not to obey.



~St. Thomas Aquinas: Commentary, II Sentences, XLIV, ii. 2.

(Selected and translated by Thomas Gilby)












Labels:





































Comments











Post a Comment



















Popular posts from this blog



















The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont












By
























 +   JMJ      This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014.    P^3   Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny  Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny   8 May2014  The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II   By John Lamont   To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...




















Post a Comment









Read more




























Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988












By
























There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'.   I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations.   Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system.   My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church.   Source   Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin  Prefect of the Congregation  for Bishops    




















Post a Comment









Read more






























Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers 












By
























 +   JMJ  Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers.   In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience.   P^3  




















Post a Comment









Read more




























Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6b: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 1)












By
























 + JMJ  Principle 1: Realize that something is amiss in the Catholic Church  The world in which I had my Traditional Awakening, is one in which practically anything pre-Conciliar such as liturgy, doctrinc, and even dogmas are either suppressed, ignored or re-framed to be acceptable to the ‘world’.  What is more, the people adhering to these pre-conciliar teachings and liturgy  are persecuted by other members of the Catholic Church.  The things that non-Trads say about Trads can be quite extreme. For example, accusations against Traditionalists include that they are:   	 A revival of 	the Jansenists 	(link) ,  	  	 Schismatics, 		  	 Heretics,  	 Uncharitable,  	 Lefebrists  	 Radicals  	 Integrists   When one group of Catholics is persecuted by the others for simply wanting to live as Catholics before them did for generations … well something is wrong.    Further, we need to realize that when what was previously condemned is now promoted and what was previously promoted as the trut...




















Post a Comment









Read more




























Forget the Reformation - It is time for Abrogation - Louie Verrecchio












By
























Mr. Verrecchio has pointed out one solution to this crisis that is a dream of many Traditional Catholics of my acquaintance: The complete obliteration of the Novus Ordo Missae.   If this were to occur, undoubtedly a revolt would occur within the Church, but the battle lines would be much clearer.  I assume that a lot of material heretics would make the transition to being formal heretics.   P^3  Prayer  Penance  Patience   Courtesy of Louie Verrecchio    A recent article by Fr. Thomas Kocik on the New Liturgical Movement website,  Reforming the Irreformable? , is getting some well-deserved attention in traditional circles. (Do yourself a favor and read it in its entirety if you haven’t already.)   




















Post a Comment









Read more