+
JMJ
It is one thing to be aware of cultural land mines, but quite another to navigate them in order to help someone to broaden their perspective on the crisis of the Church.
 |
| http://web.mst.edu/~psyworld/general/dissonance/fig1.gif |
Every time an action is presented (present actions of clergy etc) that is inconsistent with a belief held, it potentially will result in an explosion.
Sometimes, it is better to let the 'non-traditional Catholic to lead off the discussion - which will probably be an expression of a belief about Traditional Catholicism. In other words the statement will go something like this: You believe X.
After hours of discussions, I've reached the conclusion that when confronted with such accusatory statements , it is better to respond with a query as to why they have expressed the opinion.
Once the rationale for the belief has been made explicit, then it should be a simple task of producing information (preferably factual) that will outweigh their original beliefs. When confronted with the reality, then they will have the three choices to make as noted in the figure above.
I want to emphasize that it is critical to have an explicit understanding of the root of their 'belief' about Traditionalism before formulating a response. Otherwise, it is quite possible that the conversation will circle around, but never address, the real issues.
Above all, keep patience. If both parties allow themselves to become angry then nothing will be gained and perhaps all will be lost.
P^3
Prayer
Penance
Patience
References
Cognitive Dissonance: Explanation and References
Simply Psychology: Cognitive Dissonance
Comments
Post a Comment