Skip to main content

Is the Pope's Health Failing?

+
JMJ

Whenever the Pope sneezes, speculation is sure to follow.  I know that I've had the same thoughts when it was announced that the Pope cancelled a large number of events in July.

DICI has reported on the Pope's health and provides some insight to why some events may have been cancelled.

Given the disparity between the Pope's words for Traditional Catholics and everyone imbued with the Protestant Culture (Protestants, Neo Cats' etc),  it does provide another possible way to 'read' Pope Francis.

P^3
Prayer
Penance
Patience


Courtesy of DICI




The Pope’s recent absences raise questions about his health

1-08-2014 
Filed under From RomeNews
2 pape santeOn July 13, 2014, following the last-minute cancellation of his visit to Gemelli Hospital in Rome that had been scheduled for June 27, Pope Francis sent a video message apologizing to the patients and staff of that institution.  The Supreme Pontiff mentions a bad headache and nausea that came over him a few minutes before his departure for Gemelli Hospital, on the afternoon of June 27.  The cancellation had been communicated at the very hour of his expected arrival, when his collaborators and all the participants in the Mass that he was supposed to celebrate were already on site.  This new cancellation of a public appointment of the Pope had raised numerous questions about the state of his health;  some observers even doubt the real reasons for his absence.  Previously a visit to the Shrine of Divine Love near Rome, planned for May 18, had to be canceled, in order to lighten the Pope’s schedule before his journey to the Holy Land.  The cost of these receptions that were not honored by the presence of the Pope made more than one observer wince:  between 140 and 150,000 Euros for the one at Gemelli Hospital;  almost 200,000 Euros for the one at the Shrine of Divine Love.  Perhaps this very specific fact is what prompted the Pope to apologize to the patients and staff at Gemelli?
On June 16, the American Catholic website Newsmax wondered about the state of the Supreme Pontiff’s health;  (the remarks were excerpted by Dr. Jean-Pierre Dickès in a French-language report for Médias-Presse-Info dated June 19):  “Apparently the Pope has increasing difficulty breathing, since he has only one lung.  Now, because of his new duties, he can no longer exercise;  hence he has gained as much as twenty pounds, thus aggravating his respiratory problems.  Dr. Peter Hibberd, medical advisor to Newsmax, warned:  ‘Francis may be slipping into a form of chronic heart failure common among victims of significant lung disorders such as COPD.’  ‘I have the impression that something is wrong,’ explained Dr. Liu Ming, a Chinese Taoist doctor who claims to have helped cure the future Pope from heart and liver problems.  Finally, the Pope’s personal physician in Argentina had said he was ‘concerned’ about his patient’s health.”
In the June 29 issue of the Italian daily newspaper Libero, journalist Antonio Mastino published an article entitled “The Soap Opera of the Pope’s Health”.  Here are a few excerpts translated from the version posted in French at the website Benoît et moi:  “… But what are the reasons that led the Pope of ‘mercy’ to cancel his meeting with the sick ‘at the last minute’?  ‘A mild indisposition,’ they said immediately at the Casa Santa Marta;  but then another impromptu justification arrived, which partially contradicted the first, stating that he was only ‘very tired’.  Excuse me?  Either health or fatigue.  Which is it?  To judge by the annoyance of the director of the Gemelli Hospita, Maurizio Guizzardi, everything leads us to think that in his hearing someone proposed the first hypothesis.  This is the opinion of the prelate of the papal household.”  (Translator’s note:  This was Monsignor Marini, to whom a journalist posed the question, “What is going on?” and who replied “If you yourselves don’t know….”).
“As for his health, just recently a Vaticanist who is at home at the Casa Santa Marta (Editor’s note:  probablyAndrea Tornielli, Vaticanist for La Stampa, who is very close to Francis), an extremely faithful member of Bergoglio’s circle, declared that the Pope ‘is very well;  those who say that he is ill wish it were so….’   Anyway, Pope Francis is not new to these last-minute absences.  Exactly one year ago, when the musicians were already set up for their concert ‘in honor of the Pope’ in Paul VI Hall, Francis, caring about nothing and no one, announced that he was not ‘a Renaissance prince’, and therefore concerts did not interest him, and he would skip it without even a note of apology.  The musicians who had prepared for months in order to give the Pontiff evidence of their artistry played to an emblematically empty chair.  Last February, another unexpected ‘mild indisposition’ caused him to skip ‘at the last minute’ the traditional annual meeting of the Pope with the students of the Roman Seminary, ‘the Pope’s seminary’, a meeting which, from time immemorial, no pope has ever missed.  The Roman seminarians were disappointed.
“But what do these unexpected absences of Francis mean?  A partial answer is found in a book-length interview from his time in Buenos Aires, in which these ‘last-minute’ program changes were familiar.  (Translator’s note:  It is a shame that Antonio Mastino does not cite the title.)  The cardinal himself explained that ‘when I do not want to do something, to meet someone, I say that I am unwell:  I like to meet whom I want, when I want.’  In practice his ‘mild indispositions’ are to be traced back to the variable humors, and perhaps to the sympathies and antipathies of Bergoglio.  And indeed, another detail is obvious:  this time again, CardinalAngelo Scola, his direct rival at the conclave, is the one who suffers the consequences of Bergoglio’s ‘mild indispositions’.  Twice already last year, after he had obtained an audience with Francis, ‘at the last minute’ he had someone tell him that he had ‘a mild indisposition’.  An indisposition that some people by now think concerns Scola….  But the question remains:  How is Francis doing?  We have seen him remain until noon at his audiences with the faithful in excellent shape, just like the other times when he had called off meetings with Scola and others because of ‘unexpected indispositions’.  The latest unofficial news about him goes back to a few minutes after his boycott of the Gemelli Hospital:  he was strolling in the Vatican Gardens, chatting with some prelate from his entourage.  At the Casa Santa Marta, they hasten to say that the Pope’s visit to Gemelli was not canceled but simply ‘postponed’.  Who knows.  Meanwhile, the soap opera continues.”
(Sources:  Apic/IMedia/Libero/benoitetmoi – DICI no. 299 dated August 1, 2014)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...

Battle Joy

+ JMJ I was listening to a Cd of John Vennari on Battle Joy ( Recapture the Flag: Dedication and Battle Joy - by John Vennari ) and it really captures a key point that Catholics (Traditional and otherwise labelled) need to adopt. We should see this conflict as a chance to prove our mettle for our King and to earn our unending reward.  As veterans we'll be able to talk about the old battles in which we fought and the honour we gained in fighting for our King! Attached is a preview of course that, although secular, contains some of the elements of Battle Joy. P^3 https://www.coursera.org/learn/war/lecture/VDwfk/the-joy-of-battle

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...