Skip to main content

Marks of the Church - What Are They Good For? Recognizing the Church of Christ!

Image
By
+
JMJ


The Four Marks of the Church are present, and visible/knowable in order for all the world to be able to discern which of the claimants is truly the Church of Christ, His Mystical Body.

Spoiler Alert:

Even after 50 years of crisis, the Church of Christ is still Visible, it still has the Four Marks.  It is still the Catholic Church under the Successor of Peter.

For further reading: The Four Marks of the Church

As quoted in the above article:

The four marks of the Church are integral to external elements that constitute the visibility of the Church:
  • A unity that can be traced back to the Apostles in Government, Faith, & Worship.
  • A universality from the beginning to end of time embracing all peoples in the profession of the same faith.
The marks and the visibility of the Church are woven into a tapestry of the Church. Remove or mar one and the entire tapestry is ruined.
A Church that lacks this visibility, cannot be the Church, just as a Church that lacks the Four Marks cannot be the Church.
So where is the Visible, One, Holy, Catholic Apostolic Church of Christ? Where is the continual uninterrupted “assembly of men united in the profession of the same Christian faith and in the communion of the same sacraments, under the rule of legitimate pastors, and in particular, that of the one Vicar of Christ on earth, the Roman Pontiff.”
Given that the doctrine of the Faith, Sacraments and Vicar of Christ are found intact only in the "assembly of men" united under Pope Francis. That is where we find the Church of Christ - even in these days of crisis within the Church.


P^3


PS As noted elsewhere - the copy / paste from the pdf of 'Ott' is not perfect. If you want to read the original the link is provided.



14. The Visibility of the Church

Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma - Ott
Visibility is that quality of the Church on the ground of which she appear~ externally and perceptibly to the senses. A distinction is made between material and formal visibility. The former consists in the sensory appearance of her mClllberst the latter in dcfmite propertiest by which the nlembers of the Church externally and visibly belong to a religious conlmunion. The Inaterial visibility of the Church is not disputed; but the formal visibility is questioned. The formal visibility presupposes and is based on the know-ability of the Church.

1. The External Visible Side of the Church
The Church founded by Christ is an extemal visible commonwealth. (Sent. certa.)
According to the teaching of the Council of Trent there is in the Church H a visible sacrifice" and an U visible and external priesthood" (0 957). The Vatican Council teaches that Christ appointed the Apostle Peter to be the " visible foundation" (0 1821) of the unity qf the Church. Leo XIIIt in the Encyclical "Satis cognitum" (1896), teaches: "When one visualises the ultinlate purpose of the Church and the proxituate causes effecting sanctity, she is, in fact, spiritual. But when one considers the members of the Church and the means which lead to the spiritual giftst then she is externally and necessarily visible." A threefold sensible bond binds the members of the Church to one another, and makes them known as such: the profession ofthe same Faith, the use of the same means of grace, and the subordination to the same authority.

Pius XIIt in the Encyclical" Mystici Corporis/' confirmed the teaching of Leo XIII, and expressly rejected the view that the Church is "a mere spli-itual entity, joining together by an invisible link. a number of communities of Christians, in spite of their difference in Faith."

I'he visibility of the Church \vas denied by the Spiritualistic Sects of the Middle Ages, by Huss and the Reforn1ers. According to Huss, the Church consists ofthe communion of the predestinated (0627). Calvin held the sanle view. Luther taught that the Church is " the assembly of the saints (= the faithful), in which the Gospel is properly taught and the Sacranlents are properly adlninistered ., (Conf. Aug. Art. 7). But without an authoritative teaching office there is no certain norm for the purity of doctrine or for the administration of the Sacraments. The rejection of the hierarchy inevitably led to the doctrine of the invisible Church.
The biblical proof of the visibility of the Church springs from the Divine institution of the hierarchy (Par. 4). The teaching office demands from its incumbents the duty of obedience to the faith (Rom. I, 5) and the confession of faith (Mt. lOt 32 et seq.; Rom. 10, 10). To the sacerdotal office corresponds, on the part of the faithful, the duty of using the means of grace dispensed by it (John 3, 5 ; 6, 54). To the pastoral office corresponds, on the part of those shepherded, the duty of being subject to the Church Authority (rvlt. 18. 17 et seq.; Luke 10. 16).

The Prophets ofthe Old Covenant depict the Messianic Kingdom symbolically by the simile of a high mOlll1tain visible from afar off: which overtowers all other mOlll1tains, and to which all people converge (Is. 2J 2, et seq.; Mich. 4, I et seq.). According to the parables ofJesus, the Church is like an eartWy kingdom, a flock, a building, a vine, a city on a mOWltam. St. Paul compares the Church to the human body.
The Fathers teach that the Church of Christ is easily recognised and distinguished as such from heretical communions. St. Irenaeus holds against the Gnostics that the adherents of the Church throughout the whole world confess the same faith, observe the [same commandments and preserve the same form of Church constitution. He compares the Church, which preaches the same truth everywhere, to a seven-branched candlestick, \vhich, visible to all, bears the light of Christ (Adv. haer. V 20, I). St. Augustine compares the Church to a city on a mountain (Mt. S, 14) : "The Church stands clear and visible before all men; for she is the city on the mountain which caMot be hidden" (Contra Cresconium, II, 36, 45). Cf. In Ep. I loan. tr. I, 13. " The fmal reason for the visibility of the Church lies in the Incarnation of the Divine Word" (Mohler, Symbolik, Par. 36).

2. The Inner, Invisible Side of the Church Side by side with the outward visible side, the Church, like her Divine-human F01.Ulder, has also an inner, invisible side.

The purpose of the Church-the inner sanctification of mankind-is invisible. The gifts of Salvation, which the Church commtmicates, truth and grace, are invisible. The inner life-principle of the Church, the Holy Ghost, and the operation of His grace, are invisible. While the outward social side is an object perceptible to the senses, the itmer Inystical side is an object of faith. The visible appearance of the Church,
therefore, in no wise excludes faith in the Church as the salutary institution founded by God.
The objections raised against the visibility rest mostly on a one-sided emphasis on the inner spiritual side. The words ofJesus, Luke 17, 21 : "The Kingdom of God is within you" (intra vos), as they were addressed to the Pharisees. do notassert: theKingdomofGodisinyourhearts,but: theKingdomofGodis in your midst. But even in the former interpretation it does not exclude the visibility.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The myth of the Hermeneutic of Continuity - Rorate Caeli

By
+ JMJ Interestingly the complete acceptance of the Second Vatican Council (without reservations) is required of the SSPX. Just when people are starting to wonder how it came to this! Courtesy of Rorate Caeli P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

A Look Back: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976

By
 + JMJ  Looking back is important to understand why we are where we are in this crisis. Courtesy of RemnantNewsPaper  P^3 FOR THE FIRST TIME ONLINE: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976 Written by  Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre Introduction by Michael J. Matt More than forty years ago—during the disastrous reign of Pope Paul VI, the latest candidate for a Vatican-issued Halo Award, by the way—my father, Walter L. Matt, organized the first large scale public reception in the U.S. for the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. It was held at the Radisson South Hotel, Minneapolis, on Tuesday, May 12, 1976, and its stated purpose was to assist the Archbishop in gaining a stronger foothold for the Society of St. Pius X in the States during the unprecedented crisis Blessed Pope Paul had helped unleash on the Church. On that occasion Archbishop Lefebvre delivered ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Of the Church and the Pope - Fr. Calmel O.P.

By
+ JMJ Once again, looking back to see if the 'Traditional Catholics' in the early days of this crisis of the Church had a sufficient view to realize the roots of the crisis. The root: The Pope Hence when the Pope is 'righted' the Church will be 'righted'. P^3 Courtesy of SSPXasia Fr. Roger Calmel, O.P. This essay by Fr. Roger Calmel, O.P. (1914-75) helps us in these difficult times to preserve our love of the Church. More than 30 years after its first publication, this article retains all its relevance, so much so that it even seems to have been written for our time, in which the crisis in the Church deepens at an unprecedented pace. This essay will help the reader to think clearly, keep the Faith, and maintain serenity in the troubled times we are navigating. “My country has hurt m e,”wrote a young poet in 1944 during the purge 1 when the head of state [Charles De Gaulle] implacably pursued the sinister job that had been in the wo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

By
 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

By
+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...
1 comment
Read more