Benefit of the Doubt

JMJ

Introduction

!!! From my point of view and based on my understanding of the events !!!

At this point it seems that Cardinal Fernandez et al are either malicious, incompetent or geniuses.

I'm only partly kidding ...

Aside from the surprisingly magnanimous action of Pope Francis providing the SSPX priest with faculties for confession and ability to witness marriages, there has been a long silence between Rome and the SSPX with little or no formal talks or discussions regarding the SSPX state of canonical limbo.

While the FSSP et al were able to meet with Pope Leo XIV, while requests from the SSPX went unanswered ... that is until after the latest unanswered request they announced the date for the consecration of four new bishops.

Only then did the Vatican apparatus lumber into motion. A meeting was held and the speed with which the Vatican issued its press release - within hours of the meeting's conclusion - felt to me like a pre-planned attempt at manipulation that fell short of the mark.

I therefore do not see how a joint process of dialogue could end in determining together what would constitute “the minimum requirements for full communion with the Catholic Church”, since—as you yourself have recalled with frankness—the texts of the Council cannot be corrected, nor can the legitimacy of the liturgical reform be challenged. (link)

The requirement to postpone that consecrations was, I believe, the death-knell of any hope for frank and open discussions (link1, link2, link3). The SSPX has been through this exact situation before and the requirement to postpone the consecrations were seen as a repeat of the 1988 delay tactics. The setting of Vatican 2 as off-limits was a return of the 'mantra' - accept the council and accept the new mass.

As it seems impossible for Cardinal Fernandez to not understand the situation with the SSPX, the only conclusion is that they knew what they were doing.

In order to give them the benefit of the doubt I have come to three possible explanations.

Malicious

Cardinal Fernandez' intent was to draw the SSPX into a discussion, to make a minimal or token effort at said discussion, and present an unpalatable (ie compromise) condition.

This was done in order to ensure that the SSPX was once again "excommunicated", therefore enabling a program of ostracization of all Traditional Catholics and pre-conciliar doctrine from the Catholic Church.

Further, given the reception of representatives of the Orthodox and Protestants at the Vatican - this adherence to the 'mantra' is nothing short of hypocritical.

Incompetent

Cardinal Fernandez' handling of the situation was limited to a repeat of the 1988 response with an addendum of the 1996 explanatory note.

This approach ignored every other element, paper, discussion that was developed in the decades that followed the 1988 act - basically creating a 'back to the past' perspective. This placed Rome in a position to simply restart everything from scratch.

From a negotiation perspective, ignorance or willfully ignoring everything that came before is sheer incompetence, unless one wants to ensure that any negotiations fail or are prematurely aborted (see above option).

Genius

Here's one different and probably equally unpopular and unlikely perspective: Rome is neither malicious nor incompetent.

Who says that Cardinal Fernandez isn't a traditionalist in a wolf's pelt and Pope Leo XIV a hidden Traditionalist???

I can see a number of consequences if Rome were to officially allow the SSPX to consecrate bishops without accepting V2 and the NOM:

Within the Church

Open conflict: This would be a repeat persecution of the "Traditionalists" that happened immediately after the Second Vatican Council between Cardinals, Bishops, Priests, Religious (Monks, Nuns etc) and laity. We had a preview of this when Pope Benedict XVI corrected the 'pro multis'. The grey haired Catholics were outraged and freaked that this represented a 'return' to before the council.
Schism: Those members of the hierarchy and laity who strongly promote various modern theories (Theological, Liturgical and Social) would break off formally - taking Church property with them.
Emptying: If the Church holds to its Dogmas and Doctrines, which are culturally irreconcilable with the modern world, then there will be a mass exodus from Catholic Churches.

Outside the Church

Political Attacks: The Vatican is a 'State' and as a result there is an exchange of ambassadors between countries, agreements, treaties etc. Reasserting key dogmas and doctrines that have been ... unspoken for close to fifty years will result in strains on relations with other countries, recall of ambassadors and perhaps even sanctions.
Attacks on the economics of the Catholic Church: This would simply be the restriction of financial relations, calling of loans, and revocation of the charitable status of the Church and its properties.
Persecution of the Catholic Church and its members: This would probably include societal pressures and censures in Western Countries and physical persecution elsewhere in the world. Overtime, we could see a reversion to the second-class status of Catholics.
Martyrdom: There will be martyrs and there will be many.

This is the best case reason why Cardinal Fernandez has made such a sloppy business of the SSPX relations. After the Second Vatican Council, the members of the Church grew steadily closer to the World and the Flesh transforming the Catholic Church into the worlds larges Non-Government Organiazation (NGO). There are even those who want to deny the existence of the Devil.

Conclusion

Whatever the reason for the Vatican's treatment of Traditional Catholics and religious orders (SSPX, FFI et al), at this point, the escalation of commitment (Sunk Cost Fallacy) is so enormous that turning back is untenable to those who've invested. Like in the case of the In some cases it takes a new leader who was not involved to make a change (e.g. PacifiCat Project).

Pope Leo XIV seems invested in the "Council" and disinterested in dealing with SSPX and Traditionalists as Benedict XVI did ... and was punished for so doing.

My conclusion is that it is unlikely that Pope Leo XIV will be the Vicar of Christ who restores both the SSPX and Traditional Catholics to First Class Citizenship.

P^3

A Look Back: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976

+ JMJ Looking back is important to understand why we are where we are in this crisis. Courtesy of RemnantNewsPaper P^3 FOR THE FIRST TIME ONLINE: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976 Written by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre Introduction by Michael J. Matt More than forty years ago—during the disastrous reign of Pope Paul VI, the latest candidate for a Vatican-issued Halo Award, by the way—my father, Walter L. Matt, organized the first large scale public reception in the U.S. for the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. It was held at the Radisson South Hotel, Minneapolis, on Tuesday, May 12, 1976, and its stated purpose was to assist the Archbishop in gaining a stronger foothold for the Society of St. Pius X in the States during the unprecedented crisis Blessed Pope Paul had helped unleash on the Church. On that occasion Archbishop Lefebvre delivered ...

The myth of the Hermeneutic of Continuity - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ Interestingly the complete acceptance of the Second Vatican Council (without reservations) is required of the SSPX. Just when people are starting to wonder how it came to this! Courtesy of Rorate Caeli P^3

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

+ JMJ I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article. Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law. As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey. I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it. The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...

Of the Church and the Pope - Fr. Calmel O.P.

+ JMJ Once again, looking back to see if the 'Traditional Catholics' in the early days of this crisis of the Church had a sufficient view to realize the roots of the crisis. The root: The Pope Hence when the Pope is 'righted' the Church will be 'righted'. P^3 Courtesy of SSPXasia Fr. Roger Calmel, O.P. This essay by Fr. Roger Calmel, O.P. (1914-75) helps us in these difficult times to preserve our love of the Church. More than 30 years after its first publication, this article retains all its relevance, so much so that it even seems to have been written for our time, in which the crisis in the Church deepens at an unprecedented pace. This essay will help the reader to think clearly, keep the Faith, and maintain serenity in the troubled times we are navigating. “My country has hurt m e,”wrote a young poet in 1944 during the purge 1 when the head of state [Charles De Gaulle] implacably pursued the sinister job that had been in the wo...

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...

Tradicat

Search This Blog