Skip to main content

The SSPX vs the Resistance - Still Waiting for the Compromise eh!

 +
JMJ

 


 So - what's up with the 'Resistance'??? 

The 'resistance' started off around the dining room table in the Asian district.  That's where Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Chazal started the ball rolling with their fiery YouTube sermons etc. 

Thus began the saga of the resistance with their "Sell-Out" battle cry.

Eventually, other like minded priests who, over the years, had been expelled from the SSPX joined them in a loose association of members.  Finally, they were joined by Bishop Williamson who crossed a line, was expelled and proceeded to start consecrating bishops (Faure, Aquino, and Zendejas).  For some reasons (sanity) he refused to consecrate Fr. Pfeiffer. So Fr. Pfeiffer attempted to get himself consecrated as a bishop ... not certain if he had to pay to receive that doubtful sacrament.

Those were the glory days for the 'resistance' and as I predicted they didn't last long.

Soon the reasons why they were expelled created fractures and they began to split up into factions.They couldn't follow orders from their superiors so why should they do the hard work when they didn't want to? One notable example was Fr. Girouard's refusal to go to another 'resistance' mass centre.

The 'resistance' has split-up generally along the following fault-lines:Sede-Vacantists, Bishop Williamson (Ecclesia-Vacantists), Fr. Pfeiffer (just crazy), Mercenaries and US-Resistors.  The US-Resistor lines are a little blurry, but when they aren't taking shots at the SSPX they take shots at each other.

So, if we count the original priests expelled, we are two decades into this 'Sell-Out' and the SSPX still isn't regularized and hasn't sold out. 

It would be a little funny if I hadn't lost good friends and it wasn't so tragic. 

P^3 

 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome and SSPX - Version 2026 Part 2

 + JMJ Part 2 Detailed Synopsis and Timeline (ChatGPT) At this point, I took the shortcut of uploading all of my previous links and the latest SSPX and Rome links to ChatGPT. This way we’ll see how ChatGPT interprets the world as presented on the internet. P^3 Briefing Memo Subject: Rome–SSPX Relations and Planned Episcopal Consecrations (July 1, 2026) Prepared for: Ecclesial / Academic / Media Briefing Date: February 2026 Issue Overview The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has announced its intention to consecrate new bishops on July 1, 2026 , potentially without a papal mandate . The Holy See has acknowledged ongoing talks with the SSPX and stated its desire to avoid rupture, but has not granted approval nor outlined canonical consequences. The situation revives unresolved tensions dating to 1988 and raises questions about schism, authority, and doctrinal continuity. Background Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX seeks to preserve pre-Vat...

Schism

There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...

SSPX / DICI: Communiqué of the General House of the Society of St. Pius X concerning the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure.

+ JMJ The following is the communiqué of the SSPX regarding the Bishop Williamson's consecration of Fr. Faure. As a follow-up to this article ,  I would like to highlight the rationale for denouncing the consecration. Communiqué of the General House of the Society of St. Pius X concerning the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure. On March 19, 2015, Bishop Richard Williamson performed the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure at the Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Nova Friburgo, Brazil. Bishop Williamson and Fr. Faure have not been members of the Society of St. Pius X since 2012 and 2014, respectively, because of their violent criticisms of any relations with the Roman authorities. According to them, such contacts were incompatible with the apostolic work of Archbishop Lefebvre.(1) The Society of St. Pius X regrets sincerely that this spirit of opposition has led to an episcopal consecration. In 1988 Archbishop Lefebvre had c...

Bishop Huonder, SSPX in Schism? - Nope, Consecration of Holy Oils - Update 1

 + JMJ  So Bishop Huonder is in the news for two reasons.  First, his 'Testimony' concerning Pope Francis etc. This was received as a nice reinforcement by Trads (SSPX and others).  Of course, there are those that now are demanding an apostolic investigation.  Yawn, been here before.  This was predictable as other bishops who have followed the same path came to the same conclusions.  It is the way. Second, he celebrated the Chrism Mass and blessed the Holy Oils for use in the SSPX's European chapels and ceremonies.  This caused a stir amongst some Trads who are locked in one or the other statements made by either Archbishop Lefebvre or others. I received two versions of a question regarding this event: Hi Tradical Do you have any comments about doubtful oils in SSPX europe by +Huonder (NO Bishop not conditionally consecrated)? God Bless Hi Tradical Any thoughts on Huonder oil, not conditionally ordained and consecrated by SSPX bishops? God Bless M...