Skip to main content

Changes at One Peter Five

Image
By
 +
JMJ

 Steve Skojec has sold OnePeterFive to Crisis Magazine and is looking to have a more balanced family life (link).

 I understand completely the risks of putting everything into a venture such as 1P5.  He was dependent on the vagaries of the Catholic population and frankly, his 'product' seems to have paid the bills and supported his family, while avoiding many of the attendant pitfalls. 

A number of 'converts' to Tradition who have taken the same path, from my perspective, lost their balance and fell into various errors with sedevacantism being the more common one.  It is hard of a persons physically, mentally and spiritually to be confronted with the full force of the crisis and the criticism of people from all facets of this crisis.  

The criticism from Catholics who should know better (see Canon212 headline below), shows a lack of charity, empathy and insight. These types of cynical headlines reveal more about the author of the headline than that subject of the articles.

Let's put a Catholic perspective on this.  Skojec is married and has a large family. His first duty is to them, not the Catholic critics and cynics.  That he has made this move is admirable, especially as he is a 'public' figure.  His work will go on and I hope that it continues to provide a balanced perspective on this crisis and the way forward.

To Mr. Skojec, I wish him all the best success in performing his Catholic duty for his family, and thank him for his contributions to Catholicism.

P^3

Labels:

Comments

  1. Michael WAugust 31, 2021 at 6:16 PM

    Skojec put together a good product but it was obvious the professional and personal challenges were getting to him. You have to be pretty detached to be a high-profile editor. Then there was his f@c3b@@k account where he would lash out at people a lot and it was clear he was done.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sedevacantism and Heresy

By
+ JMJ I've observed three core reactions during this crisis of the Catholic Church. The Pope can't be wrong, therefore this is the New Springtime The Pope is infallible in certain conditions and there is a problem with many things that have been said, done and written, during and after the Second Vatican Council (even in the Council doc). The Pope can't be wrong, this stuff is wrong, therefore he isn't Pope. Of course there are a spectrum of responses in between, but these are the key elements. The 1st group holds the words of the Pope et al as impeccable. Here, let me get you a Koran to kiss... The 3rd group holds that they've all been heretics and lost their office.  There is also a spectrum within this group.   One answer is that they are very poor judges of heresy.  The link below provides some reasoned thought that, I'm happy to say, is completely consistent with Church Teaching. Canon law blog: Its not impossible just very diff...
4 comments
Read more

What does it mean "I'm a Traditional Catholic"?

By
+ JMJ I was visiting with a friend the other day when he said: "I'm a traditionalist". This surprised me because, while I could imagine him saying he was a "conservative or faithful Catholic", I didn't really think that the "traditionalist" label would stick. This got me to to thinking about what it means, or should mean when a person shakes you hand and says: "Hi, I'm a Traditional Catholic".
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and SSPX - Version 2026 Part 2

By
 + JMJ Part 2 Detailed Synopsis and Timeline (ChatGPT) At this point, I took the shortcut of uploading all of my previous links and the latest SSPX and Rome links to ChatGPT. This way we’ll see how ChatGPT interprets the world as presented on the internet. P^3 Briefing Memo Subject: Rome–SSPX Relations and Planned Episcopal Consecrations (July 1, 2026) Prepared for: Ecclesial / Academic / Media Briefing Date: February 2026 Issue Overview The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has announced its intention to consecrate new bishops on July 1, 2026 , potentially without a papal mandate . The Holy See has acknowledged ongoing talks with the SSPX and stated its desire to avoid rupture, but has not granted approval nor outlined canonical consequences. The situation revives unresolved tensions dating to 1988 and raises questions about schism, authority, and doctrinal continuity. Background Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX seeks to preserve pre-Vat...
Post a Comment
Read more

Schism

By
There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...
Post a Comment
Read more