FSSPX.News: Religious Sister “Preaches” a Homily at Einsielden Abbey

JMJ

Definitely one for the Chronicle.

P^3

For the first time in the history of Einsiedeln Abbey, a woman preached at Mass. Irene Gassmann, prioress of the convent of Fahr, did so in participation with the national initiative “Helvetia preaches.”

An ecumenical campaign called “Helvetia preaches” incited women involved in churches in Switzerland - Catholic or Protestant - to preach on Sunday August 1, 2021. This incitement was followed in several parts of the country.

Sister Irene Gassmann, prioress of the Convent of Fahr, asked Bishop Urban Federer, Father Abbot of Einsielden - the oldest abbey in Switzerland - to be allowed to preach the August 1 homily in the famous abbey.

The request was accepted. This is how this sister gave the homily at Mass on Sunday August 1, 2021, which is also Swiss National Day.

Preaching has always been reserved for clerics who have received at least the diaconate: in other words, bishops, priests and deacons (c. 1342, § 1 of the 1917 Code).

Although clerics of lower rank may exceptionally be admitted to preaching, lay people, even religious, are never admitted to preach in churches (c. 1342, § 2 of the 1917 Code).

The new Code admits, against all Tradition, that “the laity can be admitted to preach in a church or an oratory if the need requires it in certain circumstances… remaining the exception, C.767, §1)” (C.766 of the 1983 Code).

However, C.767, §1 prescribes: “The homily, which is part of the liturgy itself is reserved for the priest or the deacon....”

Thus, this preaching is a marked violation of canon law, and, through it, an act of contempt for the whole Tradition of the Church.

This kind of initiative will not be able to change anything in divine law, codified in the law of the Church: the one who has the power to preach in a diocese is the bishop, as well as his delegates who have received at least the diaconate.

(Sources : cath.ch/kath.ch/Naz – FSSPX.Actualités)
Illustration : Photo 19006231 © Martin Lehmann | Dreamstime.com

Comments

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making. It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX. The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience. The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members. It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean??? According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible. It means that they enjoy the beatific vision. ... that's it. That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians. It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious. That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

+ JMJ A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment ) Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...

Tradicat

Search This Blog