Skip to main content

Wait - Don't click Reply or Reply-All!

 +
JMJ

 This is a general help to working in an virtual world ... for the record I came to the following realization 2+ years ago - well before COVID.

So, how did I come by this approach ...

I was involved in a conflict resolution / negotiation between two organizations and the emails were flying back and forth between the sides.

It was a death spiral for a relationship already in tatters.

I was in a hotel room when I received one of the inflammatory emails. 

But this time something changed ...

After reading the first few words ... not even a whole sentence,  I felt myself getting angry.

I stopped reading and set it aside to go to a meeting with my colleagues. There was talk about the latest email and it wasn't good.

Over the next few days I picked up the letter several times between meetings, got angry and set it down.

Each time I made it a little further.

When I finally read the letter through in its entirety, I paused ... read it again ... and noticed a phrase that could be interpreted as a concession by our counterparts. 

This was a breakthrough for the negotiations.

There were 10 other people reading the email and no one else noticed the ambiguous phrase.

It was also a breakthrough for me.

Stopping when I am aware of an emotional trigger is my new super power.

It helps me to put some objectivity space between myself and the words on the paper or screen.

Summary

  1. Be aware when a communication (written, verbal, non-verbal) causes an emotional response.  This can be anger, confusion, sadness and even happiness.
  2. Set it aside for a period of time commensurate with the degree of emotional response you feel.  The stronger the emotion, the longer the time.
  3. After cooling off, re-read it or replay it in your mind.  If you get emotionally triggered again, go to step 2.
  4. Reflection
    1. For written communications read it through in its entirety- pause for a minute and then rinse and repeat!  Black out the zero-content words & phrases (I sometimes take a marker and block them out) and look for the key content.
    2. For verbal / non-verbal communications, think them through and think about why you had the emotional response, what exactly evoked it and (most importantly) what did you do / say that may caused them to react?
  5. Take Action
    1. Written Comms: Write a careful response looking at the key elements.
    2. Verbal /Non-Verbal: Be aware of your triggers and emotional state.  Think in advance how you will handle and re-direct the trigger.

Conclusion

 We are all susceptible to emotional triggers that cause us to react instead of respond. The more we are unaware of our emotional state, the more we can be manipulated by people adept at such maneuvers. 

So, be aware of your emotions, be wary of your reaction.  Your emotions are telling you that something in your sub-conscious has recognized a pattern.  You need to check if there is a rational foundation (ie.think principles).

It is important to pause and reflect, in this age of immediate gratification, we are too quick and react poorly.


P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX Transfers

+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...