Skip to main content

FSSPX.news: There are NOT two popes!

 +
JMJ

 I think this is going to upset a few 'resistors', 'Bene Vacantists' and maybe even the 'SedeVacantists".


P^3

Courtesy FSSPX.news

 

 

“There Are Not Two Popes,” Says Benedict XVI

March 07, 2021
Source: fsspx.news
 
Francis and Benedict XVI on November 28

On February 27, 2021, former Pope Benedict XVI gave an exclusive interview to the Italian press, eight years to the day after the coming into effect of his relinquishing the sovereign pontificate. The Pope Emeritus looks back on these eight years, and delivers his analysis of recent events.

“There is only one pope, not two.” The voice addressing the editor of Corriere della Sera is weak, but the thought behind it is still agile. Joseph Ratzinger sits in the living room on the first floor of the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery, where he retired from the world in March 2013.

Luciano Fontana did not come empty-handed: he presented the former Roman pontiff with two caricatures that Emilio Giannelli, an artist at the Corriere, made especially for him. The face of the Mater Ecclesiae host lights up: “This Giannelli is a witty person,” he says with a smile.

Then Benedict XVI returns to his resignation made eight years ago: “it was a difficult decision. But I took it with full knowledge, and I think I did the right thing,” he explains.

Francis' predecessor recalls the turmoil caused by his departure: “Some of my most ‘tenacious’ friends are still angry, they did not want to accept my choice. And I think of the theories that followed: some said it was because of the Vatileaks scandal, others that it was a conspiracy of the gay lobby, still others even advanced the case of [Bishop] Richard Williamson. Not everyone who supports these theories wants to believe in a conscious choice. But my conscience is doing well.”

In Mater Ecclesiae, life is well paced: the press—duly selected by the Vatican offices—is read every day. The Osservatore Romano, the Corriere della Sera and two other German newspapers arrive in print daily.

At the table, we often discuss politics. Moreover, the Pope Emeritus confides that he is curious to know Mario Draghi, the new President of the Italian Council: “we hope that he will be able to resolve the crisis, he is a man very respected in Germany,” he specifies.

Asked about Pope Francis’ upcoming visit to Iraq, his expression grows serious, even worried: “I think this is a very important trip, unfortunately it comes at a very difficult time, which makes it a dangerous trip for security reasons, and also because of the Covid—not to mention the instability of this country. I will accompany Francis with my prayer.”

On the new president of the United States, the Pope Emeritus chooses his words, and shows that he has lost none of his diplomatic skill: “That's right, he’s Catholic and practicing. And personally, he is against abortion,” he observes.

“But as president, he tends to present himself in the continuity of the line of the Democratic Party, and on gender theory, we have not yet grasped his position,” alluding implicitly to the suspicion and hostility of part of the American episcopate towards Joe Biden.

The interview ends. The former Roman pontiff greets Luciano Fontana, and with a smile thanks him, pointing to the two drawings by Giannelli on the table.

In the first, the cartoonist sketches a Benedict XVI symbolically embracing a crowded St. Peter’s square, while Francis is in front of a deserted square, due to the health constraints linked to Covid-19: but long before the arrival of the pandemic, the Argentine Pope was no longer really attracting crowds.

In the second drawing, Benedict XVI entrusts the keys of the Catholic Church to a frowning Pope Francis, as his predecessor gives him a whole series of recommendations.

Really, oltretevere, from fiction to reality, it's only the thickness of a sheet of drawing paper!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...