Skip to main content

FSSPX.news: There are NOT two popes!

 +
JMJ

 I think this is going to upset a few 'resistors', 'Bene Vacantists' and maybe even the 'SedeVacantists".


P^3

Courtesy FSSPX.news

 

 

“There Are Not Two Popes,” Says Benedict XVI

March 07, 2021
Source: fsspx.news
 
Francis and Benedict XVI on November 28

On February 27, 2021, former Pope Benedict XVI gave an exclusive interview to the Italian press, eight years to the day after the coming into effect of his relinquishing the sovereign pontificate. The Pope Emeritus looks back on these eight years, and delivers his analysis of recent events.

“There is only one pope, not two.” The voice addressing the editor of Corriere della Sera is weak, but the thought behind it is still agile. Joseph Ratzinger sits in the living room on the first floor of the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery, where he retired from the world in March 2013.

Luciano Fontana did not come empty-handed: he presented the former Roman pontiff with two caricatures that Emilio Giannelli, an artist at the Corriere, made especially for him. The face of the Mater Ecclesiae host lights up: “This Giannelli is a witty person,” he says with a smile.

Then Benedict XVI returns to his resignation made eight years ago: “it was a difficult decision. But I took it with full knowledge, and I think I did the right thing,” he explains.

Francis' predecessor recalls the turmoil caused by his departure: “Some of my most ‘tenacious’ friends are still angry, they did not want to accept my choice. And I think of the theories that followed: some said it was because of the Vatileaks scandal, others that it was a conspiracy of the gay lobby, still others even advanced the case of [Bishop] Richard Williamson. Not everyone who supports these theories wants to believe in a conscious choice. But my conscience is doing well.”

In Mater Ecclesiae, life is well paced: the press—duly selected by the Vatican offices—is read every day. The Osservatore Romano, the Corriere della Sera and two other German newspapers arrive in print daily.

At the table, we often discuss politics. Moreover, the Pope Emeritus confides that he is curious to know Mario Draghi, the new President of the Italian Council: “we hope that he will be able to resolve the crisis, he is a man very respected in Germany,” he specifies.

Asked about Pope Francis’ upcoming visit to Iraq, his expression grows serious, even worried: “I think this is a very important trip, unfortunately it comes at a very difficult time, which makes it a dangerous trip for security reasons, and also because of the Covid—not to mention the instability of this country. I will accompany Francis with my prayer.”

On the new president of the United States, the Pope Emeritus chooses his words, and shows that he has lost none of his diplomatic skill: “That's right, he’s Catholic and practicing. And personally, he is against abortion,” he observes.

“But as president, he tends to present himself in the continuity of the line of the Democratic Party, and on gender theory, we have not yet grasped his position,” alluding implicitly to the suspicion and hostility of part of the American episcopate towards Joe Biden.

The interview ends. The former Roman pontiff greets Luciano Fontana, and with a smile thanks him, pointing to the two drawings by Giannelli on the table.

In the first, the cartoonist sketches a Benedict XVI symbolically embracing a crowded St. Peter’s square, while Francis is in front of a deserted square, due to the health constraints linked to Covid-19: but long before the arrival of the pandemic, the Argentine Pope was no longer really attracting crowds.

In the second drawing, Benedict XVI entrusts the keys of the Catholic Church to a frowning Pope Francis, as his predecessor gives him a whole series of recommendations.

Really, oltretevere, from fiction to reality, it's only the thickness of a sheet of drawing paper!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...