Skip to main content

Critical Reading / Thinking for Catholics

+
JMJ

A practical starting point therefore, is to consider anything you read not as fact, but as an argument of the writer. Taking this starting point you will be ready to engage in critical reading. University of Leicester.

The hoopla being created by CMTV's campaign against the SSPX gave me the idea that Catholics need strong critical thinking skills in order to separate the Intergnat wheat from the chaff.

Do you want to know the two toughest courses that I took in university?

Obviously, I'm going to tell you.

The first was business law.  The teacher was insanely busy, tough and fair.  I got one of the higher marks in the class (~77%). She forced us to really look at cases from a different perspective.

The second was critical reading and writing.

Just like business law, you had to look deeper, behind, and around the ideas contained in the assignments. 

It isn't easy to stop and think about what you're reading, writing and ideas the you come across. In my experience people find it easier to simply accept things without pausing and reflecting on the deeper meanings behind things.

Definitions

Critical reading  is a form of language analysis that does not take the given text at face value, but involves a deeper examination of the claims put forth as well as the supporting points and possible counterarguments. The ability to reinterpret and reconstruct for improved clarity and readability is also a component of critical reading. The identification of possible ambiguities and flaws in the author's reasoning, in addition to the ability to address them comprehensively, are essential to this process. Critical reading, much like academic writing, requires the linkage of evidential points to corresponding arguments. (Wikipedia)

Critical thinking is the analysis of facts to form a judgment.The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking.It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities as well as a commitment to overcome native egocentrism and sociocentrism.(Wikipedia)


Critical writing is, for me, the formulation in written form the results of the analysis of someone elses work.

Critical reading Tip #1: Read Actively to Answer Questions!

One way to read in a more critical manner is to try to answer questions while you're reading and after reading to think about what you read. I have gleaned the questions from the resources noted below.
  • What is the author's thesis / overall theory?
  • What is the author trying to do? 
  • What led you to this conclusion?
  • How might this purpose influence the way the piece was written?
  • Who are they writing for?
  • What is the historical context in which it is written?
  • What are their key point?
  • What evidence does the author use?
  • What are the links between the points and the evidence?
  • What are the examples used as evidence for the supporting points?
  • How do they relate to the points?
  • What assumptions does the author appear to be making (UCL tips below)?
    • ___ is important
    • ___ is possible
    • ___ might influence ____
    • ___ is a positive thing
    • ___ is a negative thing
  • Are the assumptions reasonable in this context? 

Critical Reading Tip #2: Take Notes

Take notes and make a mind map to disassemble the text from beginning to end. 

Critical Reading Tip #3: Block out the Fluff

A lot of times writers insert fillers that simply add to the word count.  In reviewing testimony, I found it very helpful to censure out these extra words that were not contributing to the goal of the text.  Then the real message is clearer.

Critical Reading Tip #4: Ready the text at least two times

The first time skim it for the main points (which you should highlight).

The second time highlight in black or a different colour words and passages that are unrelated to the text.

The third time see how many of tip #1's questions you can answer and then ask:
  1. What is going on here? 
  2. What caused this author to write this piece? 
  3. Is there a clear logical progression or is it rambling?
  4. ...

Conclusion

To read critically requires work, to do otherwise is to be a sponge.  Be careful what you read, because the ideas you read can change your life for better or worse. 

So make certain that they are good Catholic ideas!

P^3

Resource Links


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...