Skip to main content

Critical Reading / Thinking for Catholics

+
JMJ

A practical starting point therefore, is to consider anything you read not as fact, but as an argument of the writer. Taking this starting point you will be ready to engage in critical reading. University of Leicester.

The hoopla being created by CMTV's campaign against the SSPX gave me the idea that Catholics need strong critical thinking skills in order to separate the Intergnat wheat from the chaff.

Do you want to know the two toughest courses that I took in university?

Obviously, I'm going to tell you.

The first was business law.  The teacher was insanely busy, tough and fair.  I got one of the higher marks in the class (~77%). She forced us to really look at cases from a different perspective.

The second was critical reading and writing.

Just like business law, you had to look deeper, behind, and around the ideas contained in the assignments. 

It isn't easy to stop and think about what you're reading, writing and ideas the you come across. In my experience people find it easier to simply accept things without pausing and reflecting on the deeper meanings behind things.

Definitions

Critical reading  is a form of language analysis that does not take the given text at face value, but involves a deeper examination of the claims put forth as well as the supporting points and possible counterarguments. The ability to reinterpret and reconstruct for improved clarity and readability is also a component of critical reading. The identification of possible ambiguities and flaws in the author's reasoning, in addition to the ability to address them comprehensively, are essential to this process. Critical reading, much like academic writing, requires the linkage of evidential points to corresponding arguments. (Wikipedia)

Critical thinking is the analysis of facts to form a judgment.The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking.It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities as well as a commitment to overcome native egocentrism and sociocentrism.(Wikipedia)


Critical writing is, for me, the formulation in written form the results of the analysis of someone elses work.

Critical reading Tip #1: Read Actively to Answer Questions!

One way to read in a more critical manner is to try to answer questions while you're reading and after reading to think about what you read. I have gleaned the questions from the resources noted below.
  • What is the author's thesis / overall theory?
  • What is the author trying to do? 
  • What led you to this conclusion?
  • How might this purpose influence the way the piece was written?
  • Who are they writing for?
  • What is the historical context in which it is written?
  • What are their key point?
  • What evidence does the author use?
  • What are the links between the points and the evidence?
  • What are the examples used as evidence for the supporting points?
  • How do they relate to the points?
  • What assumptions does the author appear to be making (UCL tips below)?
    • ___ is important
    • ___ is possible
    • ___ might influence ____
    • ___ is a positive thing
    • ___ is a negative thing
  • Are the assumptions reasonable in this context? 

Critical Reading Tip #2: Take Notes

Take notes and make a mind map to disassemble the text from beginning to end. 

Critical Reading Tip #3: Block out the Fluff

A lot of times writers insert fillers that simply add to the word count.  In reviewing testimony, I found it very helpful to censure out these extra words that were not contributing to the goal of the text.  Then the real message is clearer.

Critical Reading Tip #4: Ready the text at least two times

The first time skim it for the main points (which you should highlight).

The second time highlight in black or a different colour words and passages that are unrelated to the text.

The third time see how many of tip #1's questions you can answer and then ask:
  1. What is going on here? 
  2. What caused this author to write this piece? 
  3. Is there a clear logical progression or is it rambling?
  4. ...

Conclusion

To read critically requires work, to do otherwise is to be a sponge.  Be careful what you read, because the ideas you read can change your life for better or worse. 

So make certain that they are good Catholic ideas!

P^3

Resource Links


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sedevacantism and Heresy

+ JMJ I've observed three core reactions during this crisis of the Catholic Church. The Pope can't be wrong, therefore this is the New Springtime The Pope is infallible in certain conditions and there is a problem with many things that have been said, done and written, during and after the Second Vatican Council (even in the Council doc). The Pope can't be wrong, this stuff is wrong, therefore he isn't Pope. Of course there are a spectrum of responses in between, but these are the key elements. The 1st group holds the words of the Pope et al as impeccable. Here, let me get you a Koran to kiss... The 3rd group holds that they've all been heretics and lost their office.  There is also a spectrum within this group.   One answer is that they are very poor judges of heresy.  The link below provides some reasoned thought that, I'm happy to say, is completely consistent with Church Teaching. Canon law blog: Its not impossible just very diff...

What does it mean "I'm a Traditional Catholic"?

+ JMJ I was visiting with a friend the other day when he said: "I'm a traditionalist". This surprised me because, while I could imagine him saying he was a "conservative or faithful Catholic", I didn't really think that the "traditionalist" label would stick. This got me to to thinking about what it means, or should mean when a person shakes you hand and says: "Hi, I'm a Traditional Catholic".

Rome and SSPX - Version 2026 Part 2

 + JMJ Part 2 Detailed Synopsis and Timeline (ChatGPT) At this point, I took the shortcut of uploading all of my previous links and the latest SSPX and Rome links to ChatGPT. This way we’ll see how ChatGPT interprets the world as presented on the internet. P^3 Briefing Memo Subject: Rome–SSPX Relations and Planned Episcopal Consecrations (July 1, 2026) Prepared for: Ecclesial / Academic / Media Briefing Date: February 2026 Issue Overview The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has announced its intention to consecrate new bishops on July 1, 2026 , potentially without a papal mandate . The Holy See has acknowledged ongoing talks with the SSPX and stated its desire to avoid rupture, but has not granted approval nor outlined canonical consequences. The situation revives unresolved tensions dating to 1988 and raises questions about schism, authority, and doctrinal continuity. Background Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX seeks to preserve pre-Vat...

Schism

There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...