Skip to main content

Fruits of Vatican II - Part 1 Ordinations

+
JMJ

We know from Vatican 1 (Trent vs Vatican II) what fruits V2 did not produce.  It's probably a good idea to take a look at some of the fruits and effects of Vatican II.

The first that comes to mind is the New Mass, but really I think it is the secondary fruit.

The primary fruit was the collapse of Catholicism that occurred immediately after the close of the council. On this topic one of my opponents pointed out that correlation does not indicate a cause.

This is true.

There may have been other events that caused the free-fall.  However, my first premis is that something happened in 1965 and the key element in the life of the Church is the Second Vatican Council.  The correlation is strong in key metrics of the life of the Church.  After 50+ years there are now other ways to assess the validity of the claim that the cultural changes wrought by Vatican II are causal.



First, statistics can be misleading, particularly if you just look at one metric without its context.

A researcher at The Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) gave me a key insight: In looking at the stats, year over year growth in Traditionalist organizations is skewed due to the size. In order to get a better perspective, it is necessary to compare the stats to the pool of people. In essence a per-capita type of analysis.

With that in mind, I reviewed available data from the UK, US and 'World'. The data from the UK was particularly valuable as it goes back much further than the other stats.

The effects of two world wars are clearly evident ... and then we have the effect of the third world war - Vatican II.

Aside from the oscillation, it does provide some assurance that the trends in England are representative of the general trend in the Church.

The graph below shows the trend from England and Wales with the typical growth up to V2 followed by the free-fall experienced after 1965.



Why is this important?  The ordinations vs the size of the pool of people from which the ordinands were drawn is an indication of the vitality of the environment (cultural) from which they emerged.

There are a myriad of factors, but the researcher at Cara made an interesting note.  While the attrition rate of both Traditional and 'Modern' Catholic seminaries is about the same (50%), many more young men enter the former than the latter seminaries. One Cara research article (reference escapes me) noted that those religious orders that follow their rule, wear their habit, live in community have a strong identity are growing. Those that lack these facets are dying.

Conclusion, as in business, culture eats process for breakfast, every-time. Meaning, Traditional Catholic Culture has an inherent vitality. I assert that this vitality was discarded as a result of the Second Vatican Council.

Is there proof to substantiate this assertion?

Yes, on two grounds.

First, the 'roaring twenties' were also a time of cultural revolution, during which the Catholic Church maintained its cultural stance.  The effect on the ordinations - nary a blip according to the UK stats.

Second is the cultural experiment of the SSPX, ICK, FSSP, and parishes where the Traditional way of life (liturgical, doctrinal and cultural) is allowed free reign.

These are small petri dishes of pre-conciliar culture. Even the diocese of Lincoln Nebraska is an example of this as they kept the majority of the pre-conciliar cultural artifacts and their rate of ordinations to laity is (I understand) at the American pre-conciliar levels.

Looking at the SSPX ordination stats we find the following:

















Year 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979

Ordinations

3 4 4 2 6 15 15 22














Year 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989

Ordinations 23 18 16 14 21 28 31 32 23 28














Year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

Ordinations 15 27 24 25 22 29 22 30 13 20














Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Ordinations 26 17 22 25 17 19 16 16 14 25














Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average


Ordinations 25 21 22 19 20 13 19 23 19.37


Note: Some years are estimated from the graph.




























Average laity per ordinand based on reported SSPX faithful:




















300k 15488.22










1M 51627.38






















Conclusion, the SSPX ordination ratio (laity to ordinands) is at or below pre-conciliar levels.

The FSSP has similar stats:


Year200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016Average
Total7148129128111112151611

I don't have stats on the number of laity served by the FSSP but I would assume that their stats are on par with the SSPX.

When compared with the general trends in the non-Traditional Catholic world, it is clear that there is support for the conclusion that the deviation from the Traditional Culture, fostered by the Second Vatican Council has had a detrimental effect on the vitality of the Church.


More stats to follow . . .

P^3



References


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priest_shortage_in_the_Roman_Catholic_Church
https://faithsurvey.co.uk/catholics-england-and-wales.html
http://www.brin.ac.uk/2012/eighteenth-century-religious-statistics/
https://clivedfield.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/eighteenth-century-statistics-published.pdf
http://www.brin.ac.uk/commentary/drs/1-collected-by-state/
http://cara.georgetown.edu/caraservices/requestedchurchstats.html


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...

Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum

 + JMJ  Now THIS is probably the most important news item in the last two years - yes I place this above the pandemic. I'm only surprised by how long it took for this to surface during this pontificate. I hope and pray that it is false or that if it comes to pass that somehow some good will arise out of the ashes of Summorum Pontificum. P^3  Courtesy of Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum (Updated) Update (May 26): Rorate's additional sources in Rome have confirmed this Wednesday that Francis has indeed a text on Summorum Pontificum lined up, which has been developed for months, but what is not known at this point is if the text is just about a more limited take on the Summorum application questionnaire (first revealed by us in the spring of 2020) or about an overhaul of Summorum Pontificum in general: drafts could be dealing with both matters. It is also not impossible for a text to come ou...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.