+
JMJ
When is a rebuttal not a rebuttal?
When it doesn't directly address the point of contention.
In this case we have Bishop Williamson's defense of his actions in 2009.
(Quoting Fr. Wegner) It is brought to my attention that in Queen of Angels, Texas, parish of the SSPX, you said recently that when in November of 2008 I spoke to a Swedish TV interviewer about the "Holocaust", I was perfectly well aware of what harm my remarks would do to the SSPX, and I made the remarks anyway, as though I positively wanted to harm the SSPX.Key elements:
- When Bishop Williamson uttered his opinion in Germany he was definitely aware that he was breaking a civil law of that country.
- He would have to be a fool to not foresee the effects that such actions would have on his own person as well as the apostolate of the SSPX in Europe. Especially since he was banned from entering Canada for a number of years for similar comments.
- Assuming that Bishop Williamson reasonably could foresee the effects of his words and still made them anyway, the inference made by Fr. Wegner is not out of the bounds of rationality.
(Bishop Williamson continues) I will assume that this report of your words is substantially accurate, because it is a widely shared version of my intentions at that moment.
Here is the truth, with which you must do as you see fit, but you will have been told it.
When I called in question the Six Million and the Gas-chambers, for good or ill the thought of the SSPX was absolutely not in my mind. I had in mind one thing and one thing alone -- to tell what I understood to be the truth on a very important question of modern history and religion, because the "Holocaust" has been made into the most widely spread and influential substitute religion of modern times.
I expect no apology. I might be grateful if you ceased to tell counter-truths about my intention in uttering those famous words. Over to you.
With good wishes in Christ, +Richard Williamson."
So, Bishop Williamson claims that the "SSPX was absolutely not in my mind" ... well it should have been.
He should have had the SSPX forefront in his mind as he brashly proclaimed the 'truth' about a place he has never visited nor a time he has never experienced.
Truly, it is Bishop Williamson who has made a religion, his religion, out of the Holocaust (shoah).
Pray that he realizes his error before he makes his final journey.
P^3
He should have had the SSPX forefront in his mind as he brashly proclaimed the 'truth' about a place he has never visited nor a time he has never experienced.
Truly, it is Bishop Williamson who has made a religion, his religion, out of the Holocaust (shoah).
Pray that he realizes his error before he makes his final journey.
P^3
Comments
Post a Comment