Skip to main content

Advent Series December 3

 

+
JMJ

December 3

After the flood, Noe and his sons had children and they had children and so on. Years went by and families grew into tribes and tribes grew into cities then nations. They became skilled in building with bricks and in their pride decided to build a tower that would reach all the way up to heaven without God's help.

God saw this prideful plan and put a stop to it by giving people different languages so that no one could understand one another. Everyone sounded  as if they were babbling, so we call the tower that caused it all, the Tower of Babel. Since they could no longer communicate, all work on the tower stopped and people moved away. (Genesis 11)

If you look at the very end of the Bible in the chronological index, it says that one man did not agree to help build the tower. His name was Heber. Heber was the great grandson of Noe’s son Sem.

To reward Heber’s faithfulness, God let him keep the original language. We call this language “Hebrew” after Heber. So now you know that Adam and Eve spoke Hebrew in the Garden of Paradise!

Heber had children and his children had children, until another special person was born. That person was Abram. When Abram was 75, he went to live in the land of Chaanan with his family and his nephew Lot. Eventually, they parted ways and Lot went to live in Sodom.

Then there was a war and Lot was taken captive. When he heard this, Abram went with his servants and rescued Lot and Lot’s family and possessions.

After the rescue, Melchisedech, the king of Salem (which means peace), and priest of the most high God, brought forth bread and wine and offered them in thanksgiving. He blessed Abram saying, “Blessed be Abram by the most high God, who created heaven and earth.” (Genesis 14:18-19)

Melchisedech is a mysterious person. We do not know where he came from, or when he died. He
offered bread and wine to God when most sacrifices at that time were animals. Melchisedech is a priest and a king; the king of Salem (which will later be called Jeru-Salem…Jerusalem!)

Melchisedech prefigured Our Lord, the King and Eternal High Priest of the Heavenly Jerusalem.

Melchisedech offered bread and wine, which prefigured the Sacrifice of the Mass. Our priests today have the power to change that bread and wine into the very Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ.


When a priest is ordained, he is told, “Thou art a priest forever, according to the order of
Melchisedech.”

So Melchisedech is an interesting figure in the Old Testament, but Abram would have a greater part to play.

Abram was the great great great great grandson of Heber.

Abram was born 450 years after the flood, just 2 years after Noe died. (Noe’s son Sem would live until Abram was 50.)

This marks a new time in the history of mankind.

Before he died, anyone who wanted to follow the true God could have talked to Noe. The chronological index shows that Noe was born just 126 years after Adam himself died! Noe would have been able to talk to men who had known Adam, the first man personally! Those people could have told Noe exactly what Adam said regarding the creation of the world, original sin and the promise God made of the Redeemer.

But now Noe was gone. Men had much shorter lives since the Flood and there was a danger that the words of God would be lost.

So God had a special plan. He wanted to have a race of people whom He would adopt as His Own family. They would be His “Chosen People” in order to guard the true faith until the coming of the Savior.

God chose Abram to be the father of His people. He changed Abram’s name to Abraham, which means, “father of the multitude.”

We will talk more about Abraham tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...