Skip to main content

Advent Series December 2

Image
By

 +

JMJ

December 2

Adam and Eve lived many years and had A LOT of children, but 3 are mentioned especially. The first were Cain and Abel. Cain was a farmer and Abel was a shepherd. They both made sacrifices to God. God accepted the sacrifice of Abel because he offered it with a pure heart. Cain was jealous and killed Abel. From then on, Cain was cursed by God.

Many years later, when Adam was 130, he had another son named Seth. Seth is important because his descendant was Noe. Since Noe and his family were the only people spared in the Great Flood, we are all children of Adam, Seth and Noe.
 Seth had 2 other special descendants before Noe. Their names were; Henoch and his son Mathusala. Henoch was the great great great grandson of Seth.

In Genesis 5:21-24 we read that Henoch lived on earth 365 years. Then God did something special. God took him away and he was seen no more! Henoch did not die. The Apocalyse says that he will come in the last days with Elias (who also was taken up by God) to oppose the Antichrist and then they will die.
Henoch’s son, Mathusala is famous for being the man with the longest life mentioned in the Bible. He lived 969 years (Gen 5:27)

Now we come to Noe.
In the back of the Douay-Rheims Bible, you will find an historical and chonological index of the Old Testament. There it states that 1056 years after creation, Noah was born.
The Bible says that Adam lived 930 years so he died just 126 years before Noe was born. Adam’s son, Seth would live 4 more years after the birth of Noah, his descendant.
At that time, there was so much wickedness in the world, God decided to send a world-wide flood.
God told Noah to build an ark for his family and all the animals God would send.
It took Noah years to build the ark. Most likely, the other people laughed at Noah. It probably seemed impossible to them that a flood would happen, but Noah kept right on building.
We can pray to Noah for help when we feel as if we are all alone in obeying God’s laws.
 God will reward us for all eternity if we are faithful to Him here on earth.
Noah worked hard and after many years the Ark was ready. By then, even old Mathusala had died. Of all those who lived on the earth, only 8 people were saved; Noah, his wife, his 3 sons and their wives. Noah was 600 years old when the flood came; 1656 years after the creation of Adam.
After the flood, Noah made a sacrifice to God. Throughout the Old Testament, there is an emphasis on sacrifice; a need for man to give back to God; to dedicate to God the best that men had.
Sacrifices were offered to God for 4 reasons;
-To adore God   

-To thank God for His many graces  

-To try to make up for having offended the good God. (reparation)  

-Finally, to ask God for the things they needed (petition)
In fact, these are the same reasons why we offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass today
God gave Noah a sign in the sky of His promise to never send a worldwide flood again. This sign was the rainbow. Every time we see a beautiful rainbow in the sky, it is a reminder to us that God keeps His promises.
Noe is a type, or prefigurement (symbol) of Christ;
God cleansed the world by the flood, just as Our Lord cleanses us through the waters of baptism.

Noe was the father of the new human race just as Our Lord is the “new Adam”, and through His grace we become “sons of God” with God’s own life in our souls.

Noe built the Ark to save his family just as Our Lord founded the Catholic Church to help us get to heaven. The Ark that saved people from the flood is a prefigurement of the Church, which Christ founded to save souls.
God told Noah and his sons to increase and multiply. Each one of us are descendants of Noah and his sons; Sem, Ham and Japheth. The children of Sem are called Semites. They include the Chosen People of God, whom we will talk about tomorrow.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

By
 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

By
 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

By
 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

By
 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...
Post a Comment
Read more

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

By
 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...
10 comments
Read more