Skip to main content

FSSPX.News: Pius XII and the Jews: The Archives Reveal Their Secrets

 +

JMJ

 This seemed worthy of a  quick note given the detractions made against Pope Pius XII. 

P^3

 Courtesy of FSSPX.News

Pius XII and the Jews: The Archives Reveal Their Secrets

February 10, 2022
Source: fsspx.news

Pope Pius XII personally saved more than 15,000 Jews during the Second World War. This is the latest finding of the in-depth study carried out by a German historian on unpublished documents from the Vatican archives, inaccessible until recently. The black legend of a silent and complicit pope has definitely had its day.

The chief archivist of the Bundestag (German parliament), Michael Feldkamp, ​​spent part of his life trying to gain some clarity about the attitude of the Catholic Church towards the Jews during the Second World War, making him a recognized expert in the field.

Having recently gained access to unpublished documents, the historian brushes aside the thesis of an ignorant and indifferent Pius XII regarding the horror of the concentration camps: “What is new now, and what we have always known so far, is that Eugenio Pacelli, Pius XII, knew about the Holocaust very early on,” explains Michael Feldkamp.

Better informed than the American secret services, the Roman pontiff at the time had even alerted the still free West, without being listened to: “regarding the systematic extermination of European Jews, Pius XII sent a message to U.S. President Roosevelt in March 1942 – two months after the Wannsee conference.”

“In it, he warned him that something was happening in Europe in the war zones. These messages were not considered credible by the Americans.” The silences are therefore not what we thought they were.

“Today we know … that Pius XII was confronted with the persecution of the Jews almost on a daily basis. He had been presented with all the reports, and had created his own office within the Second Section of the Secretariat of State, where the staff had to deal exclusively with such matters. There was Bishop Domenico Tardini …and Bishop Dell'Acqua,” two future cardinals, “who explained the situation to him daily,” explains the German historian.

The study of the most recent archives recently declassified thus makes it possible to estimate that “Pius XII personally saved about 15,000 Jews through his own personal efforts: opening monasteries and cloisters so that people could be hidden there, and so on. The archival findings I have found now in the Vatican shows me how accurately Pacelli was informed,” he adds.

“New facts have finally come to light: Pope Pacelli’s support for the Jews went so far that the Papal Palatine Guard, a kind of bodyguard for the Pope – like today’s Swiss Guard – was involved in fights with the Waffen-SS, with Wehrmacht soldiers, to hide Jews in the Roman basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore,” reports Michael Feldkamp.

“Now we can see and prove all this. In this way, we can now correct many of these vague assumptions or even accusations . . . above all, there is the accusation that Pius XII did nothing and remained silent,” says the historian.

Indeed, the non-denunciation of the crimes for which the Pope was then accused can be “considered reasonable, considering that he was leading people into hiding in covert operations. He could not then draw further public attention to himself by organizing protests or writing protest letters, but to divert attention, he conducted negotiations with the German embassy and the Italian police force, even with Mussolini and the Italian foreign minister and so on. He always tried to get as much as possible through negotiations.”

Nevertheless, Michael Feldkamp is aware that lies die hard, and that it will not be easy to reestablish the truth about the pontificate of Pius XII: “there are still people who say that they cannot imagine that, for 70 years we have believed what was wrong, and now it is supposed to be different. I encounter this skepticism often, both inside and outside the Church.”

It must be said that within the Catholic hierarchy, there seems little hurry to rehabilitate a pope known for having opposed the spirit of novelty which swept through the Church in the 1950s, and which was to triumph in the following decade. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...

Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum

 + JMJ  Now THIS is probably the most important news item in the last two years - yes I place this above the pandemic. I'm only surprised by how long it took for this to surface during this pontificate. I hope and pray that it is false or that if it comes to pass that somehow some good will arise out of the ashes of Summorum Pontificum. P^3  Courtesy of Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum (Updated) Update (May 26): Rorate's additional sources in Rome have confirmed this Wednesday that Francis has indeed a text on Summorum Pontificum lined up, which has been developed for months, but what is not known at this point is if the text is just about a more limited take on the Summorum application questionnaire (first revealed by us in the spring of 2020) or about an overhaul of Summorum Pontificum in general: drafts could be dealing with both matters. It is also not impossible for a text to come ou...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.