Skip to main content

FSSPX.News: Archbishop Gänswein Counterattacks

 +
JMJ

Somethuing for the Chronicle.

P^3

Courtesy of FSSPX.News


Archbishop Gänswein Counterattacks 

A few days after the Pope Emeritus's letter responding to the report on the management of abuses committed in the Archdiocese of Münich and Freising between 1945 and 2019, Benedict XVI's private secretary intervened in the American media to denounce an enterprise of destabilization coming from the German Synodal Way.

In the lines that follow, it is not a question of defending or accusing the Pope Emeritus, but, in reporting the words of Archbishop Gänswein, of noting the simultaneity of the attacks made against the figure of Josef Ratzinger and the attacks against Catholic dogma, discipline, and morals by the German Synodal Path movement, a simultaneity which is disturbing to say the least.

The best defense is a good offense: an adage that the private secretary of the former Roman pontiff made his own, during an exclusive interview with EWTN on February 14, 2022.

The channel founded by Mother Angelica – an iconic figure of American conservative Catholicism – decided to give the floor to Archbishop Georg Gänswein at the very moment when Benedict XVI was coming under attack by numerous Western media denouncing the mismanagement of abuses in the Church under his pontificate.

For the prelate from Baden-Württemberg, the negative judgments on the actions of Josef Ratzinger as archbishop or pope, stem from “ignorance or bias that have nothing to do with honest coverage of the facts.”

On the contrary, the pope emeritus is the “father of transparency” in matters of abuse in the Church, and if his action has not had all the expected effects, it is because of “internal resistance,” says Msgr. Gänswein.

And the latter notes with a touch of irony the coincidence of the violent attacks against the Bavarian former pope and a crucial vote within the sadly famous “Synodal Path,” a veritable quagmire in which the Catholic Church of Germany is caught up to its neck.

Indeed, at the height of the storm, between last February 3 and 5, the German prelates indiscriminately approved draft texts going in all directions of a breathless progressivism, calling for: the abolition of priestly celibacy, the ordination of women priests, same-sex blessings, and changes to Christian teaching on homosexuality, etc.

“We can speculate about the extent to which this is connected temporally or causally with what you have mentioned, that is — to name it clearly — the Synodal Way in Germany and other movements. But one thing is clear: Certain goals that the Synodal Way is aiming at are something for which the person and the work of Benedict stand in the way,” estimates the secretary of Josef Ratzinger, who does not hesitate to mention a “manipulation” of the bishops on the banks of the Rhine.

Beyond a certain “pleasure of some to go after the pope emeritus,” the Synodal Way “is using the crisis of abuses to reshape the Church as it pleases,” warns Msgr. Gänswein. “There is also the concept of the ‘abuse of abuse.’ And that is precisely the danger that lies herein.”

And the secretary of the former Roman pontiff recalled that his master had received a telephone call from the Holy Father, as well as a “beautiful letter, in which he assured him once again, and with really touching words of his support, his solidarity and his support, telling him that he had his back,” adding “that he cannot understand why they come down so hard on him.”

“Of course, it’s one thing to resist pressure and quite another to withstand pressure internally,” he added. “But, thank God, he has managed to do so: He is calm, and, above all, he has never lost his sense of humor,” concludes Archbishop Gänswein.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...