Skip to main content

FSSPX.News: Archbishop Gänswein Counterattacks

 +
JMJ

Somethuing for the Chronicle.

P^3

Courtesy of FSSPX.News


Archbishop Gänswein Counterattacks 

A few days after the Pope Emeritus's letter responding to the report on the management of abuses committed in the Archdiocese of Münich and Freising between 1945 and 2019, Benedict XVI's private secretary intervened in the American media to denounce an enterprise of destabilization coming from the German Synodal Way.

In the lines that follow, it is not a question of defending or accusing the Pope Emeritus, but, in reporting the words of Archbishop Gänswein, of noting the simultaneity of the attacks made against the figure of Josef Ratzinger and the attacks against Catholic dogma, discipline, and morals by the German Synodal Path movement, a simultaneity which is disturbing to say the least.

The best defense is a good offense: an adage that the private secretary of the former Roman pontiff made his own, during an exclusive interview with EWTN on February 14, 2022.

The channel founded by Mother Angelica – an iconic figure of American conservative Catholicism – decided to give the floor to Archbishop Georg Gänswein at the very moment when Benedict XVI was coming under attack by numerous Western media denouncing the mismanagement of abuses in the Church under his pontificate.

For the prelate from Baden-Württemberg, the negative judgments on the actions of Josef Ratzinger as archbishop or pope, stem from “ignorance or bias that have nothing to do with honest coverage of the facts.”

On the contrary, the pope emeritus is the “father of transparency” in matters of abuse in the Church, and if his action has not had all the expected effects, it is because of “internal resistance,” says Msgr. Gänswein.

And the latter notes with a touch of irony the coincidence of the violent attacks against the Bavarian former pope and a crucial vote within the sadly famous “Synodal Path,” a veritable quagmire in which the Catholic Church of Germany is caught up to its neck.

Indeed, at the height of the storm, between last February 3 and 5, the German prelates indiscriminately approved draft texts going in all directions of a breathless progressivism, calling for: the abolition of priestly celibacy, the ordination of women priests, same-sex blessings, and changes to Christian teaching on homosexuality, etc.

“We can speculate about the extent to which this is connected temporally or causally with what you have mentioned, that is — to name it clearly — the Synodal Way in Germany and other movements. But one thing is clear: Certain goals that the Synodal Way is aiming at are something for which the person and the work of Benedict stand in the way,” estimates the secretary of Josef Ratzinger, who does not hesitate to mention a “manipulation” of the bishops on the banks of the Rhine.

Beyond a certain “pleasure of some to go after the pope emeritus,” the Synodal Way “is using the crisis of abuses to reshape the Church as it pleases,” warns Msgr. Gänswein. “There is also the concept of the ‘abuse of abuse.’ And that is precisely the danger that lies herein.”

And the secretary of the former Roman pontiff recalled that his master had received a telephone call from the Holy Father, as well as a “beautiful letter, in which he assured him once again, and with really touching words of his support, his solidarity and his support, telling him that he had his back,” adding “that he cannot understand why they come down so hard on him.”

“Of course, it’s one thing to resist pressure and quite another to withstand pressure internally,” he added. “But, thank God, he has managed to do so: He is calm, and, above all, he has never lost his sense of humor,” concludes Archbishop Gänswein.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...