Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 7

 

+
JMJ

December 7


Pharaoh would not let the Israelites leave Egypt so God sent sufferings; 10 plagues to encourage Pharaoh to change his mind.
Pharaoh was very stubborn, though and with each plague, he still refused to let the Hebrews go.

The 10 plagues were:
  1. water in the Nile River turned to blood
  2. frogs
  3. dust was changed to small insects
  4. flies
  5. a disease killed all the cattle
  6. sores called boils broke out on people and animals
  7. hail and lightning
  8. locusts (grasshoppers) ate all the plants
  9. darkness
  10. every first born Egyptian boy died.
Before God sent the tenth plague, He told the people of Israel that each household must kill a lamb and spread its blood on the doorway of their homes. When the angel of death went through Egypt, it would see the blood of the lamb and pass over that house, sparing the boys inside. For this reason that night was called the Passover. Every year, the Jewish people celebrate the Passover in remembrance of that night in Egypt.

In fact, Our Lord was celebrating the Passover with His 12 Apostles at the Last Supper; the night before His death. The Paschal lamb was a symbol of Our Lord, since He died to save all of mankind. St. John the Baptist called Our Lord, “Lamb of God”. Our Lord is the true Paschal Lamb, by Whose blood we are all redeemed.


Finally, after the tenth plague, Pharaoh agreed to let the Israelites go free. So 600 thousand men of Israel, together with their families and cows, sheep and goats all left Egypt together. That was ALOT of people!!!

After the Israelites had gone, Pharaoh changed his mind. He got his army together and chased after them. The Israelites were on the shores of the Red Sea when they saw Pharaoh's army coming in the distance. You can imagine their panic! They had nowhere to run! Moses prayed to God for help and God told Moses to stretch forth his rod. Then an amazing thing happened! God made the waters of the Red Sea divide. A strip of dry land appeared so that the people could go across. Imagine what it was like to cross the sea, with towering walls of water on either side!

Pharaoh and his army followed the Hebrews, right through the Red Sea. This was not a very smart move on his part…
Once the Israelites were safely across, God allowed the waters to return. Pharaoh and his army were drowned!

Now the Israelites were in the desert. God took care of His children. He guided them with a cloud by day and a pillar of fire at night. God sent them food from heaven, which formed on the ground every morning. When the Israelites first saw the strange sight, they all turned to each other saying “Manhu?” Manhu means, “What is this?” in Hebrew. So they called the food “Manna” from the word, “Manhu”. (Exodus 16)

God told the Hebrew people to gather only enough Manna for each day. Anything extra would spoil. God did this so that the people would come to trust in His loving Providence. This was the Hebrew’s daily bread; a prefigurement of our Daily Bread; God Himself, Food for our souls Whom we can receive every day in the Holy Eucharist!

Moses and the children of Israel made their way to Mount Sinai where they were supposed to make sacrifices to God. The offering of sacrifice was important because it helped them remember how much they owed to God. Also, for 400 years the Israelites had lived in a pagan land, surrounded by false gods. Some of those false gods had been calves, sheep and goats. By demanding the sacrifice of calves, sheep and goats, God was helping the Israelites to remember that these things were only creatures and to reject the false gods of Egypt.

When they reached Mount Sinai, God called Moses to come up the mountain alone to pray. God gave Moses the 10 Commandments; those laws He wanted His people to obey, written on tablets of stone. God also gave instuctions as to how the Isrealites were to worship Him.

Moses stayed on Mount Sinai 40 days and 40 nights. While Moses was on the Mountain, the Israelites got restless. They made a false god; a statue of a golden calf and began to worship it.
When Moses returned and saw what was happening he threw down the stone tablets in anger and they broke.

With the help of the sons of Levi, who had remained faithful, Moses destroyed the idol and punished those who had worshiped the false god.
God commanded Moses to bring 2 more tablets of stone up the mountain and again engraved the Law on them.

God also commanded the Israelites to build the Ark of the Covenant; a beautifully decorated chest. It held the treasures of God to His people; the stone tablets of the 10 Commandments and some manna.
To reward their faithfulness, the sons of Levi were made guardians of the Ark of the Covenant.

The Israelites also made a tent, called a tabernacle which would act as a house for the Ark, until they came to the promised land where they could build a proper temple.
That tabernacle was a symbol of the tabernacle on the altar in church where the Blessed Sacrament is kept; Our Lord Jesus Christ; God Himself!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...