Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 11

 

+
JMJ

December 11



Yesterday, we talked about how the Israelite entered the Promised Land. Today we call this area Palestine, or the Holy Land.

For the next 150 years, the Israelites go through a cycle;
First they turn away from God and fall into idolatry.
As a consequence, they become weak and their enemies take over.
Then they return to God and pray to God for help.
God saves them, after which:
they are good for a time.
Then the same thing happens all over again

This happened 7 times in 150 years

We may be inclined to shake our heads at this, but how many times do we go back to confession having committed the same sins! We know that sinning does not bring happiness, but we do the same thing over and over. We must work to be stronger in our resolutions and stay close to God, Who is our strength. Our Lady will help us too, and our guardian angel, if we ask them for help. Our Lady told St. Catherine Laboure that many graces would be given to us if we only asked for them.

During this time, the leaders of the Israelites were called Judges.
These are the 12 main Judges: (Their names are sometimes spelled differently)

Othoniel
Aod (Ehud)
Samgar (Shamgar)
Debbora (a woman)
Gedeon (Gideon)
Thola (Tola)
Jair
Jephte (Jephthah)
Abesan (Ibzan)
Ahialon (Elon)
Abdon
Samson


We've got 2 stories to tell about a couple of these judges.

We will talk about Debbora first.
In Debbora’s time, (Judges chapter 4) the Israelites had once more turned away from God. As a result, they grew weak without God's help and King Jaban of Chanaan and, Sisera, his general made life miserable for them. After 20 years, however, God heard the prayers of the Israelites, who by then had learned their lesson and turned back to Him (for the time being).

God told Debbora to call upon a man named Barac to lead the Israelites against that nasty general, Sisera. Barac told Debbora that he would lead the Israelites in war as long as she came too.

Now Sisera had an immense army, but his greatest weapons were 900 chariots with knife blades sticking out from them!
And hearing that the Israelites were gathered for war, Sisera brought his army to the place. But when the Israelites attacked, God struck terror into Sisera and his army and they turned and ran!

Barac chased after Sisera's army and they were destroyed. (you can read more about this time in the book, “Hittite Warrior” from Bethlehem Books)

(Parents, be aware, if you're reading this out loud to little ones, the next part is kind of grisly!)

But Sisera jumped off his chariot and ran away on foot, escaping from Barac. And as he was fleeing, Sisera came to the tent of Jahel, wife of Haber the Cinite. Jahel met Sisera and invited him inside and she gave him some milk to drink and covered him to hide him from his enemies. But when Sisera was asleep, Jahel came to him with a nail and a hammer. And she took the hammer and drove the nail through his head right into the ground.

And so died Sisera, general of King Jaban of Chanaan!

And Debbora and Barac sang, “Blessed among women be Jahel.” (Judges 5:24)
Jahel is a type, or symbol of Mary. Jahel delivers the people from Sisera by crushing his head, just as Mary is the woman who crushes the head of Satan with her heel.
And the people cried out “Blessed among woman be Jahel” just as Saint Elizabeth said to Mary “Blessed art thou among women.”

After the death of Sisera, the Israelites had 40 years of peace. But the children of Israel again did evil in the sight of the Lord (Judges chap 6).
And for 7 years they suffered again from the pagan nations, who destroyed their crops.

Again the Israelites turned back to God asking for deliverance.

And an Angel of the Lord appeared to Gedeon telling him to go and fight.
But Gedeon wanted a sign that God was with him.
So Gedeon brought cooked meat and loaves of bread, and the angel told Gedeon to put the food on a rock.
And the angel touched the food with a rod, and fire came from the rock and burned up the food.

And the angel disappeared, and at God’s command, Gedeon destroyed the altar of the false idol Baal. (Remember Baal of the Moabites?)

Then Gedeon put a fleece of wool on the floor, asking God for a sign. In the morning if there was dew on the fleece only and not on the floor, he would know that God meant to deliver Israel. And it was so.

And a third time Gedeon asked God to send a sign; this time that the dew should fall on the ground only and not on the fleece. And God did as he asked.

So Gedeon led the people of Israel against their enemies, but God wanted them to know that their victory came from Him and not their own strength. Because of this, God did not want a large army. So at God’s command, Gedeon told the soldiers to leave and go home if they were afraid. And 22 thousand men went home!

That left 10 thousand men. But God told Gedeon they were still too many for His army. God commanded Gideon to bring them to the water to drink. Most of the men knelt down to drink, but 300 men took the water in their hand and lapped it like a dog. God told Gedeon to keep those 300 men and send the rest home.

Out of 32 thousand men, only 300 were left!

That night when all was very very dark, Gedeon and his men surrounded the enemy’s camp.
Together they blew their trumpets and clanged pitchers, making much noise.
The enemy woke up, thinking they were being attacked, and the whole camp was in an uproar.
In the darkness, the enemy fought one another, thinking they were fighting the Israelites!

And when the fighting was over, the Israelites brought 2 of their enemies heads to Gedeon. (more head crushing!)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...