Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 10

 

+
JMJ


December 10


Right after Balaam blessed the Israelites, some of God’s chosen people began to do bad things. First they started to spend time with the Moabites. The Moabites were pagans who worshipped false gods, especially one called “Beelphegor” (or Baal of Peor. Many times we will see this false god Baal come up in the history of the Old Testament.)

Soon some of the Israelites started to worship the false god Baal too. They did all sorts of bad things right in front of the other Israelites. At first no one would do anything about it and God was very angry. Then Aaron’s grandson, Phinee, saw what was happening and right away, he stood up for God and punished the evildoers. As soon as Phinee started to do something, the others followed.

This is a good thing to remember. Sometimes when you are with others, it seems that you are the only one who wants to do the right thing. If you stand up bravely, though, you may be surprised that others will gladly follow you!
Remember what Jesus said, “He who confesses Me before men I will also confess before My Father in heaven.” If you stand up for Jesus, He will stand up for you too when you die.

It was so important that the Israelites kept the true faith. Without the true faith, the world would not recognize the Savior when He came, so after the Israelites fell into idolatry for the second time, God told Moses to write more laws so that His people would not turn away from Him again.

The laws that Moses wrote this time were part of the Deuteronomic Covenant God made with His people. They are found in the book of Deuteronomy.

The first 5 books of the Old Testament, then, are:
1) Genesis
2) Exodus
3) Leviticus
4) Numbers
5) Deuteronomy
These 5 books were written by Moses, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. We call these 5 books the “Pentateuch.” ("penta" means 5)

At the end of Deuteronomy, we read how God showed Moses the Promised Land. Then, after blessing the Israelites Moses died at the age of 120; (having good eyesight and all his teeth!) (Deut 34:7).

Now we come to the book of Joshua (Josue).
After the death of Moses, Joshua became the leader of the Israelites. To show that He blessed Joshua as leader, God made another miracle.

God commanded Joshua to lead His people across the river Jordan into the promised land. The priests were ordered to carry the Ark of the Covenant into the Jordan river, and God made the waters of the river stop at the Ark, so that the people could cross on dry land!

Now the promised land had a lot of pagans living in it. The Israelites had to fight for their land, but God wanted them to depend on Him as their strength.
The first city in their path was Jericho. Jericho had huge walls all around it.

To take over Jericho, God told the Israelites to march around the city every day for 6 days. On the 7th day, God said to march around the city 7 times. The priests led the way carrying the Ark of the Covenant.
Then the people were ordered to blow their trumpets. Do you know what happened? When the trumpets blew, the walls of Jericho just fell down!

This lesson is very very important. All through the Old Testament we see God trying to teach His people to trust in Him as their strength. As long as they obeyed God, the chosen people were powerful, but when they tried to do things their way, they became weak and were defeated.

This lesson is just as important for all of us today. When Our Lord came to earth, He said the same thing, “Without Me, you can do nothing”. On the other hand, as long as we try to do things God’s way, what do we have to fear?

The rest of the Book Of Josue talks about how the Israelites conquered the land of Chanaan and divided it up among the 12 tribes. At the end, Josue died at 110 years of age.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...