Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 13

 

+
JMJ

December 13

We have been talking about the time of the Judges.

The Judges were leaders who came to the help of Israel when there was great need. They united the people to fight against their enemies. At other times, each of the twelve tribes ran their own affairs. The book of Judges ends with the words, “In those days there was no king in Israel: but every one did that which seemed right to himself.” (Judges 21:24)

Now we come to the birth of Samuel.

Samuel’s mother, Anna had wanted to have a baby for a long time. She promised God that if He sent her a little boy, she would give him to the Lord all the days of his life and would never cut his hair (according to the Nazarite law…just like Samson).

God heard Anna’s prayer and sent her a son. When Samuel was old enough, Anna gave Samuel to Heli, the high priest and judge, saying:

“My heart hath rejoiced in the Lord, and my horn is exalted in my God:
my mouth is enlarged over my enemies: because I have joyed in my salvation. There is none holy as the Lord is: for there is no other beside Thee…The bow of the mighty is overcome, and the weak are girt with strength…The Lord maketh poor and maketh rich, he humbleth and He exalteth..” (1 Kings Chapter 2)

Our Lady knew the Scriptures well.
No doubt she had the canticle of Anna in mind when she uttered her own Magnificat;

“My soul doth magnify the Lord. And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
… Because He that is mighty, hath done great things to me; and holy is His name…He hath put down the mighty from their seat, and hath exalted the humble…He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich He hath sent empty away.” (Luke Chapter 1)

So Samuel lived with Heli and helped with the duties of a priest.
The time came, however, when God was not pleased with Heli, because his sons were wicked and Heli did not correct them.

And one night, God called Samuel, and Samuel answered, “Speak, Lord for Thy servant heareth.” (1 Kings 3:10) “And the Lord said to Samuel…In that day I will raise up against Heli all the things I have spoken concerning his house…For I have foretold unto him, that I will judge his house forever, for iniquity, because he knew that his sons did wickedly, and did not chastise them.” (1 Kings 3:11-13)

At that time, the Philistines were still enemies of the Israelites. There was a great battle, and the Israelites were losing so they called for the Ark of the Covenant to be brought to battle in order to save them.

So the sons of Heli brought the Ark, but they were killed in battle and the Ark was taken by the Philistines.
When Heli heard the news, he was overcome with shock and died.

The Philistines took the Ark and brought it into the temple of their idol, Dagon.
And the next morning, the Philistines found the idol lying face down before the Ark.
They set the statue up again, but the next morning, they again found the statue lying on the ground, this time with its head and hands cut off! (Remember Genesis 3:15… “she shall crush thy head”)

Wherever the Philistines brought the Ark, God punished them with sickness. Finally they sent the Ark back to the Israelites.

Samuel was now the priest, prophet and judge of the people.
When the Ark returned, Samuel offered sacrifice to the Lord in thanksgiving. The Philistines stopped attacking and there was peace for a time.
Years went by, and Samuel grew old. Up until then, God had ruled the people of Israel Himself; choosing the judges who would lead them in time of need.

Now the Israelites decided they wanted a change. They asked for a king.
God warned His people (through Samuel) that they would not always like having a king rule over them, but He let them have their way.

So we come to a new period in Old Testament history: the period of the Kings.
This period would last 120 years. There were 3 kings during this time; King Saul, King David and King Solomon. Each would reign 40 years.
We will talk about King Saul first.

Saul was a great big tall man, head and shoulders taller than any other man in Israel.
One day Saul was out looking for his father’s donkeys. Presently he came to the town where Samuel was staying, and Saul and his servant went to visit Samuel.

When Saul entered, God spoke to the prophet Samuel, telling him that Saul was to be king. Samuel called all the men of Israel together, and told them that God was going to give them a king. Everyone drew lots to determine who should be king and the lot fell to Saul.

At first Saul was a good king and defended his people from the Philistines, but after a time he began to grow proud. Finally came the day when Saul disobeyed God and God rejected Saul as king.

Tomorrow we will see what happened next




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX Transfers

+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...