Skip to main content

Advent Series - December 23

 

+
JMJ

December 23

We have seen how the Persians, under Cyrus the Great took over the Chaldean Empire. King Cyrus allowed the Jews to return to Judea,their homeland, and rebuild the Temple at Jerusalem.

The Persians went on to conquer most of the known world. They took over Egypt, putting an end to the dynasty of the great Pharaohs.

India also became a Persian province. The Persians tried to take over Greece as well, but they were defeated at the battle of Marathon. (This victory was remembered by the Greeks with the Marathon races.)


The Persians ruled for many years, but eventually their empire came to an end. A young man named Alexander the Great led armies out of Greece and in a few short years, he took over the civilized world.

In 331 B.C. the Greeks took over Judea and Judea became a Greek province. Many Jews moved to Alexandria in Egypt and to other parts of the Greek Empire (This spreading out of the Jews all over the world is called the “Diaspora” which is Greek for “Dispersion”.)

Greek became the world language. At Alexandria in Egypt, 70 Jews worked to translate the Bible into Greek. This translation was called the “Septuagint” (from the Latin, “septuaginta” which means 70.)

The Greek Septuagint was a factor that the Catholic Church used to decide which books belonged to the Old Testament (The list of books which have been inspired by God is called the Canon of Scripture)

Alexander the Great died in the year 323 B.C. After his death, Alexander’s generals and later on, their families fought for power. 2 families in particular; the Ptolemies of Egypt and the Seleucidae of Syria fought over Judea. The Seleucids won.

In 168 B.C., Seleucid leader Antiochus IV (also called Antiochus Epiphanes) decided to force the Jews to live like Greeks. He made a new law, forbidding the Jewish religion. He took over Jerusalem and profaned the Temple; stealing the sacred vessels and setting up an altar to the false god Zeus. He persecuted the people, destroying their homes and killing those who did not worship Greek idols.

One man stood up against Antiochus. This man was Mathathias. Mathathias and his 5 sons lived in the mountain of Modin. When the king’s men came to force everyone to sacrifice to idols, Mathathias pulled down the altar, and crying with a loud voice, said, “Every one that hath zeal for the law…let him follow me”

So the Jews formed an army under Mathathias, and they fought Antiochus, tearing down his altars.

But Mathathias was a very old man. He died shortly after when he was 146 years old, and his oldest son, Judas Machabeus continued the fight against the Seleucids. In December, 165 B.C. Judas (or Judah) Machabeus led the Jews into Jerusalem.

Throwing out the idols, he purified the Temple, and the small amount of good oil they had, by God's miracle lasted 8 days. The Jews remember this event with the festival of Hanukkah.Antiochus IV also died, but other Seleucid leaders continued the battle.

While all this was happening, there was another power rising; the power of Rome.

Judas Machabeus heard of these Romans; that they ruled with justice and fairness, and he sent men to Rome to make an alliance with them. The Jews promised to help the Romans fight their battles and the Romans promised to help the Jews.

During this time, the Bible tells of another family; a mother and her 7 sons. The Greek Seleucids tortured and killed each one of them because they would not deny God. The family remained steadfast and firm to the end, encouraging one another. (2 Maccabees chapter 7)

Judas Machabeus died in battle, but his brothers took up the fight.

Now we come to the end of the Old Testament.


The Old Testament ends with the victory over Nicanor who was sent by the Seleucid king to fight the Jews. The head of Nicanor was cut off (!) and hung on top of the castle as a sign of God’s help.

Today’s O Antiphon is, “O Emmanuel”

"O God With Us our King and Lawgiver, the Expectation of the nations, and their Savior: come and save us, O Lord our God."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...