Skip to main content

Heros and Villains of Traditional Catholicism - Part C

Image
By
+
JMJ


Introduction

Who is worthy of being regarded as a hero - I think I captured that quite well in Part B of this series:
My thought is that a hero should be defined by their adherence to Truth and principles.
In my musings I wonder if there is a lifecycle to heroes /villains? Since everyone selects their heroes and these are roughly organized into clans are the differences irreconcilable?

Hero / Villain Life-cycle

I have observed a progression from Hero to Villain (see timeline) and I have a number of heroes that are still safely on the "Plateau of Heroism", but quite a few have been found wanting and either in decline or are now 'villains' as they no longer meet the heroic criteria or oppose those who I designate as 'heros'.


Hero to Villain Life-Cycle / Time Line

That brings up a key point, a hero ideally stays on the plateau, the pinnacle of heroism. Meaning that they meet the criteria I specified earlier.  Also, there's nothing saying a villain can't be redeemed. For example, Bishop Williamson could always recant his theological errors and ask forgiveness for his disobedience.

Tradical's Heroes and Villains





Above is  my current list of Hero's and Villains ( I may explain my classifications at a later date).  Keep in mind that I'm not saying those whom I regard as heroes are perfect.  Just that they meet the criteria. Likewise, those in the decline or emerging as villains I have concerns or they simply no longer meet the criteria.

Interestingly, in some cases a hero has a villain opposing them. Bishop Fellay has the villains Bishop Williamson et al opposing him.  I once regarded Bishop Williamson as a hero, but I have benefited from his transition to villainy.  It provided me the impetus to review his actions and writings, some of which I just passed over as part of his eccentricities.  For example his interview on the Shoah (sp), provided an example of his imprudence; his flight to South America to provide confirmations, provided an example of his disobedience. 

Even Michael Voris et al were once on the ascendance. However, since he never really did anything to demonstrate that he met the criteria he stayed in that spot for quite a while.  Now, with his latest campaign against the SSPX, he is now firmly in the villains camp (ie the black speckles now out number the white ones by a fair margin) - mostly because of their ineptitude and irrational bias.  Interestingly, as with Bishop Williamson, I now look at his pieces with a more critical eye.

For me that is an unexpected benefit of a villain, they help you to think critically. We should do that with both our villains and with our heroes, USING OBJECTIVE MEASURES.  Otherwise we may be blind sided into accepting a villain as a hero.

Clan Reconciliation?

What are the clans that Michael Matt is speaking about?  Is a reconciliation possible let alone probable?

The 'clans' are basic groupings of Catholics based on their use of the Tridentine Mass, adherence to Catholic Teaching and position on the authority of the Pope. For the sake of completeness I have included the Orthodox and Protestants.




So in the fight for the heart and soul of the Catholic Church, I think we can exclude the Non-Catholics.  The Church is just in too much of a mess to think that they will help and not hinder in this internecine conflict.

Likewise, we can exclude the "Mainstream" Catholics that includes the Liberal, Modernist, Moderate and Conservative Catholics. They are either actively working to promote this crisis or simply grumble about important but still surface issues (communion in the hand, kneelers etc).

The Rogue Trads are a hodge-podge of beliefs that, IMHO, are not reconcilable.  So we can count them out of the 'fight' so to speak. This of course includes the 'Resistors' that were a number of sub-cultures that previously existed within the SSPX but separated when it became obvious that the SSPX actually embraced Catholic Teachings.

This leaves us with the regular and irregular Traditionalists.  In my opinion there is a chance to 'unite' these two clans but there is a challenge (or 'defi' as they say in french). The regularized are at the mercy of the hierarchy.  A hierarchy that appears to be full of weak bishops and some actual villains. In practice this means that although they are virtually identical to their irregular confreres (most stem from the SSPX) they are vulnerable if they cross any of the plentiful red lines setup by the hierarchy.

Obviously, the SSPX does not suffer from this particular challenge. Theirs is the stigma of being irregular (see Tradicat: Is the SSPX in schism?).  

The regularized stance is based upon their status within the Church, if they were seen to be drifting towards the SSPX stance (as happened ~2000) they would be smacked down ... again.

The only way to overcome this challenge is for the SSPX to be given a no-compromise regularization and all the former ecclesia-dei communities be attached to the SSPX in some manner. This structure was discussed in the early 2000s and would be the only way I can see the regularized but compromised clan being united with the irregularized but uncompromised clan.


Map of Followers

The map put together by Gabriel  is really cool as it shows the alignment of the followers for the various groups  (see Tradicat: What does the acronym CMTV stand for?).

Originally, I used this diagram to show that CMTV's followers are basically social conservatives with links to Catholicism.  When I examined the left side of the diagram I found a blend of trads and had fun with a rhyming app to find all the different types of Trads.  


The end message is that heroes and villains have followers that are 'aligned' based on a variety of criteria. Many of which are more emotional and culturally based than rational and principle based.

If we want to know who is truly worthy of our admiration, then we need have a good blend of both emotion and culture,  and use Catholic Teaching as our guide. This means you need to know your faith and employ critical thinking skills to sift the Heroes out of the chaff of villains.

P^3





Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

By
 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Church Militant TV and the SSPX - Again

By
+ JMJ The old narrative used to be that the SSPX was 'schismatic' and 'excommunicated'. Now the excommunication has been lifted for a number of years and the only ones who think it still has effect are the 'resistors'. That leaves the other opponents of the SSPX with the label 'schismatic'. Make it clear, the conservative Catholics have issues with the SSPX probably because they violate some of their assumptions about the Faith and this crisis of the Church. Church Militant TV is one of these the exists along the Catholic thought spectrum. They like the Traditional Mass but must ensure that they don't get tarred with the same 'schismatic' brush that the liberals use against the SSPX.  So what do they do, they use the same brush against the SSPX. The funny thing is that even when the Church does speak, they don't want to listen and persist in calling the SSPX 'schismatic'. Here's a transcript of the latest s...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Position of the SSPX on Canonizations by the Saint Factory

By
+ JMJ I have sometimes been criticized for including 'St' as a title for Pope John Paul II et al. I've given my reasons here  in a discussion with Alex Long. The question is one of prudence in discussions with ntCatholics and in some cases with tCatholics. In discussions with:  ntCatholics, I will use the title in order to continue the discussion and help them arrive at a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. tCatholics, I will use the title in order to broaden their perspective on the doctrine of dogmatic facts. This broader perspective is, in my opinion, essential maintaining a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. So from a doctrinal position, I have written the article Dogmatic Fact of Fancy  and includes a reference on canonizations. Now, I know the position of the SSPX is that the canonizations are doubtful (see references below) and I also know of at least one non-SSPX theologian who agrees with the level of doubt du...
Post a Comment
Read more