Skip to main content

Heroes and Villains of Traditional Catholicism - Part A

+
JMJ

Introduction

I am wondering, why do Traditional Catholics need heroes?  Over the years I have seen a number of people emerge and be hailed as heroes only to later turn into villains. At least, people that seem to betray the very principles for which they were originally admired.

This created a new question:  What makes them heroes and then what makes them villains?

In this series, I'm going to relate my reflections on this topic based on my 35+ years as a Traditional Catholic.

Seeds of Heroes

For decades, Traditional Catholics have been persecuted. They believe that they are right, but in varying degress they are conflicted about the actions of the leaders of the Catholic Church and their personal beliefs about the Catholic Church (see cognitive dissonance).

This conflict is painful and begets a maze of decisions.  People like things to be black and white. They like complex things to be simple, hence all the conspiracy theories about 911, COVID-19 etc.

More importantly, persecuted people NEED confirmation that they are 'right'. They NEED someone to reinforce their beliefs and anyone who does so will be seen favorably (see confirmation bias).   Hence those who expose scandal, pontificate on various opinions and positions are regarded as heroes. 

But there's a caveat. Just like social media influencers, they are only heroes if their opinion resonates with that of their followers. The transformation into a villain starts when the hero deviates from the beliefs of their followers.

The followers make a personal investment in these heroes, they trust them and this leads to the followers assimilating their heroes beliefs. The farther they follow their hero, the more committed and invested they become, it seems especially true if it involves moral danger.  There is an excitement in fighting for something or someone you believe in, to be seen taking a courageous stand against injustice. Having new meaning and purpose added to their life can be intoxicating.

Looking at the steady stream of Traditional Catholic Heroes and Villains, it seems to me that some Traditional Catholics search for heroes who give purpose to their suffering, heroes who fight the way they would want to fight in this war.

What Makes a Hero?

So what makes one person a hero and another a villain?  If a person does an act without witnesses,no one will ever think of them as a hero. I have come to think that we 'make' someone a hero.

Definitions

  • Hero: a person admired for achievements and noble qualities; one who shows great courage. (Merriam-Webster)
  • Villain: a character in a story or play who opposes the hero; a deliberate scoundrel or criminal; one blamed for a particular evil or difficulty.
Looking at these definitions, it appears that I wasn't too far off. In human terms we decide when a person is a hero and a villain is defined by those who oppose him (or her).  I sometimes wonder if it is possible to be a 'hero' without a villain.The key lesson is that whether a person is a hero and villain is subjective.  We admire a hero for their achievements and qualities.  We admire them because they inspire us and they say what we want to have said and think what we want to be thought.

A hero is a reflection of their followers and an influencer as well. People become followers because of a basic resonance with their biases, prejudices, emotions, culture and principles.

That is the seed of a hero, the beliefs of their followers.

Something to consider, who are your heroes, people you look up?  Why do you look up to them?  What does this tell you about yourself?

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming Traditional Catholic - Part III Seeing Things for What They Are

+ JMJ An aspect of becoming a TCatholic is realizing that some things that you thought were 'Catholic', really aren't. For example, communion in the hand, not kneeling to receive or during consecration. Don't believe me? Here's an EWTN article on the topic: In the Latin Church, however, kneeling is the sign of adoration for Christ who has just become present on the altar. This came about through the dogmatic development of Eucharistic theology in the West. To go back to the earlier practice in the West would be a sign of devolution of doctrine, and in fact, that is the way the devout faithful perceive efforts to change Latin practice, as a counter-sign of faith. For Eastern Catholics this is not a problem, since they have never inculturated the Latin way of expressing adoration. EWTN - Kneeling at the Consecration Then we get to the topic of apparitions (not unique to nTCatholics).  In this regards we have Bayside, Medjugorje and Fr. Gobbi to name a few....

Becoming Traditional Catholic - Part IV Knowing The Catholic Truth

+ JMJ In my previous post, I discussed seeing things for what they are ... including the actions of Pope's. I know this is a hard pill to swallow, but it is necessary to have an objective measure by which to assess the actions of the Pope - even without a PhD in Theology and Philosophy. The objective measure is the Teaching of the Catholic Church. Hence, it is important to study to know your Faith. For undiluted instruction I recommend Catechism of the Council of Trent and Catechism Explained. This would serve as a foundation for understanding not only the crisis, but also recognizing error when it appears in front of you! Having said this I have two counsels to give: When something you see or hear 'feels' wrong and / or heretical, don't react right away.  Do some research to make certain.  The biggest problem in the last 50+ years, has been Popes that speak out of both sides of their mouthes.  One moment they speak as a 'Catholic', the nex...

Becoming Traditional Catholic Part I

+ JMJ It is a big step from the non-Traditional to Traditional Catholic World. First of all, the Trad world is much smaller, isolated and under siege. This leads to a number of interesting elements that a person making the transition needs to take into account. The Trad World Is Smaller It is a fact that in the states there are about 30,000 Traditional Catholics who support the SSPX and about 3,000 in Canada.  The other Traditionalit orders (FSSP, ICK, etc), I assume, are in the same ball park if not smaller. Let put that in perspective, in my area there are 270,000 non-Traditional Catholics. Consequently, aside from the larger centers,  a Traditional 'Parish' or Mass Centre will be 200 people or less. This has the advantage of being like an extended family and cozy. It has the disadvantage that any crazy 'uncles' in that family will be in plain sight. Be forewarned that any eccentricity that would be drowned in a sea of people in a non-Traditiona...

Becoming Traditional Catholic Part V - Staying Traditional Catholic

+ JMJ My post about seeing things as they are  has drawn a fair amount of attention. A quick recap: Part: Outlined the isolation of Traditional Catholics Most non-cradle Traditional Catholics experienced an transitional moment when they realize that they've been tricked / lied to most of their Catholic lives by Popes, Bishops, Priests, Brothers, Nuns and other Catholics. Seeing things as they are.  For example: The Catholic Charismatic movement is anything but (ie it is really a protestant hook that the naive Catholics have inhaled).  Communion in the Hand (as practiced now - not as practiced in some placed early in the life of the Church) is protestant.  That removing the Filioque from the Creed is Schismatic. ... the list goes on. How to help distinguish the Protestant / Schismatic elements that permeate the 'Modern' Catholic Church from the vestiges of Catholicism. - Study! Now the question is how, once one has found Traditional Catholicism, to r...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...