Skip to main content

Heroes and Villains of Traditional Catholicism - Part A

Image
By
+
JMJ

Introduction

I am wondering, why do Traditional Catholics need heroes?  Over the years I have seen a number of people emerge and be hailed as heroes only to later turn into villains. At least, people that seem to betray the very principles for which they were originally admired.

This created a new question:  What makes them heroes and then what makes them villains?

In this series, I'm going to relate my reflections on this topic based on my 35+ years as a Traditional Catholic.

Seeds of Heroes

For decades, Traditional Catholics have been persecuted. They believe that they are right, but in varying degress they are conflicted about the actions of the leaders of the Catholic Church and their personal beliefs about the Catholic Church (see cognitive dissonance).

This conflict is painful and begets a maze of decisions.  People like things to be black and white. They like complex things to be simple, hence all the conspiracy theories about 911, COVID-19 etc.

More importantly, persecuted people NEED confirmation that they are 'right'. They NEED someone to reinforce their beliefs and anyone who does so will be seen favorably (see confirmation bias).   Hence those who expose scandal, pontificate on various opinions and positions are regarded as heroes. 

But there's a caveat. Just like social media influencers, they are only heroes if their opinion resonates with that of their followers. The transformation into a villain starts when the hero deviates from the beliefs of their followers.

The followers make a personal investment in these heroes, they trust them and this leads to the followers assimilating their heroes beliefs. The farther they follow their hero, the more committed and invested they become, it seems especially true if it involves moral danger.  There is an excitement in fighting for something or someone you believe in, to be seen taking a courageous stand against injustice. Having new meaning and purpose added to their life can be intoxicating.

Looking at the steady stream of Traditional Catholic Heroes and Villains, it seems to me that some Traditional Catholics search for heroes who give purpose to their suffering, heroes who fight the way they would want to fight in this war.

What Makes a Hero?

So what makes one person a hero and another a villain?  If a person does an act without witnesses,no one will ever think of them as a hero. I have come to think that we 'make' someone a hero.

Definitions

  • Hero: a person admired for achievements and noble qualities; one who shows great courage. (Merriam-Webster)
  • Villain: a character in a story or play who opposes the hero; a deliberate scoundrel or criminal; one blamed for a particular evil or difficulty.
Looking at these definitions, it appears that I wasn't too far off. In human terms we decide when a person is a hero and a villain is defined by those who oppose him (or her).  I sometimes wonder if it is possible to be a 'hero' without a villain.The key lesson is that whether a person is a hero and villain is subjective.  We admire a hero for their achievements and qualities.  We admire them because they inspire us and they say what we want to have said and think what we want to be thought.

A hero is a reflection of their followers and an influencer as well. People become followers because of a basic resonance with their biases, prejudices, emotions, culture and principles.

That is the seed of a hero, the beliefs of their followers.

Something to consider, who are your heroes, people you look up?  Why do you look up to them?  What does this tell you about yourself?

P^3
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Communiqué on the Meeting between Cardinal Ladaria and Fr. Pagliarani

By
+ JMJ I suspect that the 'resistance' will be freaking out about this ... but as with the Archbishop, when Rome calls ... they go ... even if just to let them know (again) why they do what they do. Concerning the alleged 'sell-out' I have this to say: I should update the meme ... with 2017, 18 etc. The 'resistors' should stop and think a little: We are in the 18th year of the latest sell-out frenzy. So we're still waiting. Try and reconcile the 'resistance' positions with the Catholic Faith. If it doesn't objectively sync up - admit that you're wrong and take appropriate action. I have also attached some commentary from CFN. P^3 Courtesy of FSSPX.news Courtesy of Catholic Family News Communiqué on the Meeting between Cardinal Ladaria and Fr. Pagliarani November 24, 2018 By Eucharistic Crusade The Palace of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith i...
2 comments
Read more

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

By
 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

By
There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops
Post a Comment
Read more

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more