Skip to main content

CMTV: Are Sarah Gonzalez' Stories Credible?

+
JMJ
I have already discussed the issues with the Gonzalez story and something has popped up in twitter that further undermines its credibility:
A 38-year-old woman who hosted parties for teens — supplying them drugs and alcohol — at her Westwood house has been sentenced to more than two years in prison. ... Sarah Maria Gonzalez was sentenced Wednesday in Johnson County District Court where she pleaded guilty in May to endangering the welfare of a child and distribution of marijuana and hallucinogenic mushrooms.

d more here: https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article103396427.html#storylink=cpy


So, Sarah Maria Gonzalez is not exactly what I would call a credible witness in that she herself was found guilty of supplying teens with drugs and alcohol.

To confirm this I looked her up on KASPER.  If you enter Sarah Maria Gonzalez you will get confirmation.  To speed your search, here's the docket number:

GONZALEZ, SARAH M   (KDOC# 0114611)

There are already holes in the stories being related by the Gonzalez', this is just another part of the torn fabric of this family. 

I saw them around campus back in the 80's and its sad to see how the family self-destructed.

Pray for them because theirs is a lonely, dark and dangerous path.

P^3












Comments

  1. What a cheap and stupid hit job, probably by one of the abusers. I met Maria in the late 90s, right around when her brother committed suicide. She told me all these stories. It’s a known trend that the abused often become abusers themselves. I’m sorry to hear Maria has traveled that path. But dismissing the horrors of her upbringing using her transgressions reeks of amateurish attempt at cover up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. My original reply was longer. I would just point "host" to this article and as them to comment there.

      http://tradicat.blogspot.com/2020/06/cmtv-gonzalez-story-something-doesnt.html

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cathinfo and the 'resistance' perspective (updated with response to comment)

+ JMJ Matthew, the owner of Cathinfo - a resistance forum has posted a response to a person that indicated his reasons for continuing to go to the SSPX.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Mary Victrix: The Cyrpto-Lefebvrist Dodge (aka The Crypto-Lefebvrist Dodge)

+ JMJ Setting aside the spelling mistake in the title, I noticed yet another volley in the ongoing war of words between Fr. Greiger and various other people he has labelled as 'cyrpto-lefebvrists'. I also noticed that he has made some statements that are not supported by references or distort the actual positions of the SSPX. As a rule I assume that a person is of good-will and not of malicious intent. This is, after all, the Catholic approach to relations. So at this point I am assuming that Father Angelo Mary Greiger is simply operating under a confirmation bias , that he may be using to reduce any cognitive dissonance that he is experiencing. As such when I noticed some of the issues with the post were incorrect, I emailed Fr. Greiger my thought. As he has not amended the article, I post below a copy of my email. P^3

What the heck is a congregation of "Pontifical Right"

+ JMJ In a discussion with a friend the question occurred to me that I didn't actually know was is involved in being a religious order of 'pontifical right'. I had a vague notion that this meant they reported to Rome as opposed to the local diocese. I'm also aware that, according to the accounts I have heard, the Archbishop received 'praise' and the written direction to incardinate priests directly into the SSPX.  This is interesting because it implies that the SSPX priests were no longer required to incardinate in the local diocese but in the SSPX. This is something that belongs to an order of 'pontifical right'. Anyway here's some definitions: Di diritto pontificio is the Italian term for “of pontifical right” . It is given to the ecclesiastical institutions (the religious and secular institutes, societies of apostolic life) either created by the Holy See or approved by it with the formal decree, known by its Latin name, Decretu...