Skip to main content

The Failure of the CMTV Campaign

Image
By
+
JMJ

The CMTV campaign against the SSPX (ie: Not for the victims) is winding down and I think it is time to do a stock take. I originally was going to review the articles, but the volume of FUD and UFFI* makes this a fruitless task - so I'm going to sum up my conclusions.

First, there are actual cases of abuse (neither creepy nor possibly inappropriate behavior qualifies) that have already been addressed in various ways over the years.   I would be surprised if there are not active cases that the SSPX is examining.  That's why they have instituted the P2P program, to be proactive.  I have been involved in the development of early versions of the program and in my opinion it is a good program. Further, I'm happy to see it being implemented in the USA. In addition, to my knowledge Fr. Angles was not involved in the early development of the program.

Second, instead of promoting them, those listed and actually guilty of abuse are, to the best of my knowledge, no longer members of the SSPX.  This is a key difference between the SSPX and the situation that enabled McCarrick to rise to the ranks of the hierarchy.

Third, the CMTV 'articles' are poorly written and researched. I found the Kansas City Star (KCS) article way easier to read than the confused CMTV articles and more balanced. Frankly, I found the CMTV video all flash and dash. Thinking about it now I found the KCS refreshing.

Fourth, as noted the CMTV 'articles' string together a number of various allegations and tries to make a case for a conspiracy theory. 

One article in particular lays out a string of assumptions (I stopped counting after five) and attempts to make inferences based on this non-existant foundation.  In short, the lesson taught to me by a senior engineer still holds:
When you assume something you make an ASS out of U and ME
The fact that no trad media have jumped on the CMTV SSPX Bashing Trad Wagon for me is just confirmation that CMTV's argument that the SSPX is "Sympathetic to Perverts" doesn't stand up to the light.  Interestingly, when they realised they weren't getting tracking,  Voris et al complain that no one is picking up their story and that trads are bashing them.  As my kids would say, "Seriously?"

This campaign has simply made an ass out of Mr. Voris and Ms. Niles.

Fifth, several of the articles are told soley from the perspective of people whose credibility is suspect due holes in their story, their character, mental stability, or simply repeating old (decades) claims.  Sadly. one of them is from a person claiming to be a witch.

CMTV seems to operate under a confirmation bias, especially with the Jassy case, where there is real abuse there must be a conspiracy. Recently, som have stepped forward to provide context in the Fr. Abbet case:


Sixth, a number of the stories are locked in time.  Either they are old stories of people expelled from the SSPX or they don't take into account that people and circumstances change. One victim couldn't believe that a priest who allegedly abused him hadn't abused someone else in the intervening years. 

Lots has changed over the years, in some cases the guilty priests had psychiatric assessments, others were sent to the various isolated houses.  Another change is the rolling implementation of P2P in North America. 

Finally, the underlying theme is guilt by association in which the conspiracy theory is put forward that the abusers must have great influence in the SSPX. Right, so great an influence that they are expelled etc.

I'm glad that we're not in a communist country where guilt by association is a valid piece of evidence.

My conclusion is that the CMTV campaign has changed neither the situation nor the outcome. 

The real investigation was being done by the police investigators, with whom the SSPX was cooperating prior to the CMTV article.  Just like Fr. Angles cooperated with the authorities when, in the wake of the Waco crisis, allegations of weapons caches emerged. The SSPX is following the Catholic
principles for handling these situations and crimes,  and from my review those who need to know (those with a responsibility and authority) are involved.

End message: Pray for the real abuse victims.

P^3



* UFFI is my new acronym for : Unfounded Faulty Fabricated Inferences

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

By
 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

By
 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

By
 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

By
 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...
Post a Comment
Read more

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

By
 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...
10 comments
Read more