Skip to main content

Pope Francis? I Don't Trust Him!

Image
By
+
JMJ


While the title words are true of me, they were actually spoken to me a few years ago by the father of a family.

The difference is the principles we use as a guide for our actions.

At that time we had already agreed to abide by Catholic principles (see further reading section below), but his distrust of Pope Francis and by extension the SSPX leadership was too great an obstacle to overcome.  Shortly after he spoke these words he stopped seeking the Sacraments from the SSPX.

In later forum discussions, I reached the conclusion that to make obedience contingent upon trust in the leader is actually an manifestation of liberalism.

So here's an attempt at tying it all together ...


Key Principles and Definitions

  1. The Ends don't justify the means or better put as : Catholics don't sin in order to obtain an end. 
    1. No matter what we are trying to achieve, if we have to sin in order obtain something, even the salvation of the world, then it isn't worth it.
  2. Obedience
    1. I've written a few series on this one (see list at end of post)... the gist of St.Thomas's instruction in the summas is summarized in figure 1.
    2. Following St. Thomas, Obedience is based upon elements that are objective:
      1. Order of a legitimate superior,
      2. that is within the sphere of the superior's authority,
      3. that does not require sin.
    3. To disobey an order that meets the criteria for obedience is sinful.
  3.  What is a liberalism? 
    1. Liberalism is manifested in a number of ways, but at its root is the denial of authority and its ability to bind the individuals morally.
    2. Despite the condemnation of Liberalism by pontiffs (see Mirari Vos by Pope Gregory XVI 1832), modern society is steeped in it and it has manifested itself within the Catholic Church over the past 100+ years in a couple of ways (Modernism, Second Vatican Council, Ecumenism, etc).
    3. "A fundamental principle of Liberalism is the proposition: "It is contrary to the natural, innate, and inalienable right and liberty and dignity of man, to subject himself to an authority, the root, rule, measure, and sanction of which is not in himself". This principle implies the denial of all true authority; for authority necessarily presupposes a power outside and above man to bind him morally. ( Catholic Encyclopedia )"
  4. Trust is subjective
    1.  I think 'subjective' is best defined along side 'objective'.  Here's a couple definitions from the 'business dictionary' that suit:
      1. Subjective refers to personal perspectives, feelings, or opinions entering the decision making process.
      2. Objective refers to the elimination of subjective perspectives and a process that is purely based on hard facts.
    2. Trust is a personal perspective on the confidence that we can place in another person.
      1. Trust: "Reliance on someone. One has confidence in people as persons, trusts them to be faithful to their commitments, and hopes to obtain from them what they promise. ..." Catholic Culture: Trust
  5. Trust and Obedience 
    1. If an individual decides that he does not trust his superior and they hold that trust higher than the objective elements of the command, they risk disobeying a legitimate command.
    2. This makes the objective criteria of obedience subservient to the subjective confidence (trust) held in the superior.
Figure 1: Obedience Summary Matrix

Tying it all together

In summary:
  1. Liberalism effectively denies an authority's power to issue morally binding commands.
  2. Catholic teaching is that a superior has the authority to bind subjects morally when the criteria for obedience are present.
  3. Liberalism is the antithesis of Catholic Obedience.
Because trust is the subjective confidence held by a person, making their obedience to superioes subservient to this confidence is a manifestation of liberalism.

Perhaps I could phrase this more convincingly ... but it will do for now.

P^3


Further Reading:
Series - Breaking Down St. Thomas' Teaching on Obedience
Series - True Obedience
Series - Obedience
LifeSiteNews:  How Liberal Catholics are slowly destroying Catholicism in America
Catholic Encyclopedia: Liberalism


Steady Principles for Unsteady Times - Concerning interpreting Archbishop Lefebvre's Writings, Conferences, Interviews etc
Catholic Dogmas, Doctrines and Principles - What are they good for? 
Catholic Dogmas, Doctrines and Principles - Expanded
 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

By
+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

By
+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...
Post a Comment
Read more

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

By
+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

By
 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX Transfers

By
+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...
2 comments
Read more