Skip to main content

Pope Francis? I Don't Trust Him!

Image
By
+
JMJ


While the title words are true of me, they were actually spoken to me a few years ago by the father of a family.

The difference is the principles we use as a guide for our actions.

At that time we had already agreed to abide by Catholic principles (see further reading section below), but his distrust of Pope Francis and by extension the SSPX leadership was too great an obstacle to overcome.  Shortly after he spoke these words he stopped seeking the Sacraments from the SSPX.

In later forum discussions, I reached the conclusion that to make obedience contingent upon trust in the leader is actually an manifestation of liberalism.

So here's an attempt at tying it all together ...


Key Principles and Definitions

  1. The Ends don't justify the means or better put as : Catholics don't sin in order to obtain an end. 
    1. No matter what we are trying to achieve, if we have to sin in order obtain something, even the salvation of the world, then it isn't worth it.
  2. Obedience
    1. I've written a few series on this one (see list at end of post)... the gist of St.Thomas's instruction in the summas is summarized in figure 1.
    2. Following St. Thomas, Obedience is based upon elements that are objective:
      1. Order of a legitimate superior,
      2. that is within the sphere of the superior's authority,
      3. that does not require sin.
    3. To disobey an order that meets the criteria for obedience is sinful.
  3.  What is a liberalism? 
    1. Liberalism is manifested in a number of ways, but at its root is the denial of authority and its ability to bind the individuals morally.
    2. Despite the condemnation of Liberalism by pontiffs (see Mirari Vos by Pope Gregory XVI 1832), modern society is steeped in it and it has manifested itself within the Catholic Church over the past 100+ years in a couple of ways (Modernism, Second Vatican Council, Ecumenism, etc).
    3. "A fundamental principle of Liberalism is the proposition: "It is contrary to the natural, innate, and inalienable right and liberty and dignity of man, to subject himself to an authority, the root, rule, measure, and sanction of which is not in himself". This principle implies the denial of all true authority; for authority necessarily presupposes a power outside and above man to bind him morally. ( Catholic Encyclopedia )"
  4. Trust is subjective
    1.  I think 'subjective' is best defined along side 'objective'.  Here's a couple definitions from the 'business dictionary' that suit:
      1. Subjective refers to personal perspectives, feelings, or opinions entering the decision making process.
      2. Objective refers to the elimination of subjective perspectives and a process that is purely based on hard facts.
    2. Trust is a personal perspective on the confidence that we can place in another person.
      1. Trust: "Reliance on someone. One has confidence in people as persons, trusts them to be faithful to their commitments, and hopes to obtain from them what they promise. ..." Catholic Culture: Trust
  5. Trust and Obedience 
    1. If an individual decides that he does not trust his superior and they hold that trust higher than the objective elements of the command, they risk disobeying a legitimate command.
    2. This makes the objective criteria of obedience subservient to the subjective confidence (trust) held in the superior.
Figure 1: Obedience Summary Matrix

Tying it all together

In summary:
  1. Liberalism effectively denies an authority's power to issue morally binding commands.
  2. Catholic teaching is that a superior has the authority to bind subjects morally when the criteria for obedience are present.
  3. Liberalism is the antithesis of Catholic Obedience.
Because trust is the subjective confidence held by a person, making their obedience to superioes subservient to this confidence is a manifestation of liberalism.

Perhaps I could phrase this more convincingly ... but it will do for now.

P^3


Further Reading:
Series - Breaking Down St. Thomas' Teaching on Obedience
Series - True Obedience
Series - Obedience
LifeSiteNews:  How Liberal Catholics are slowly destroying Catholicism in America
Catholic Encyclopedia: Liberalism


Steady Principles for Unsteady Times - Concerning interpreting Archbishop Lefebvre's Writings, Conferences, Interviews etc
Catholic Dogmas, Doctrines and Principles - What are they good for? 
Catholic Dogmas, Doctrines and Principles - Expanded
 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

The Position of the SSPX on Canonizations by the Saint Factory

By
+ JMJ I have sometimes been criticized for including 'St' as a title for Pope John Paul II et al. I've given my reasons here  in a discussion with Alex Long. The question is one of prudence in discussions with ntCatholics and in some cases with tCatholics. In discussions with:  ntCatholics, I will use the title in order to continue the discussion and help them arrive at a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. tCatholics, I will use the title in order to broaden their perspective on the doctrine of dogmatic facts. This broader perspective is, in my opinion, essential maintaining a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. So from a doctrinal position, I have written the article Dogmatic Fact of Fancy  and includes a reference on canonizations. Now, I know the position of the SSPX is that the canonizations are doubtful (see references below) and I also know of at least one non-SSPX theologian who agrees with the level of doubt du...
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

By
+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

By
 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...
Post a Comment
Read more