Skip to main content

Emerging from the Crisis - One Catholic At A Time: How to Find God ... and Discover Your True Self in the Process

+
JMJ

It is clear that the Catholic Church will not emerge from the crisis because we simply want and pray for it to happen.

We need to start with ourselves.

My wife is reading a book on Catholic Spirituality written by Dom Hubert Van Zeller in 1957. She compared this gem to her understanding of the spirituality of Archbishop Lefebvre.

While tempted to compare the behaviour of Pope Francis and others to the principles that I have quoted below - we need to honestly compare our own perspective and extract the beam out of our own eye first.

P^3


How To Find God ... and Discover Your True Self in the Process available from Sophia Press.



You must run after spiritual heroism

Almost every excess in the spiritual life, then, can be traced to a desire for God that will not wait, to homesickness for a home that we have never been to, but of which we know enough to realize that we shall never be happy anywhere else. God spells for us security, rest, and belonging. 

If we thought of God more in the terms of what He has revealed about Himself and less in terms of what we shall feel when we have found Him, we would be less liable to error in our approach. We tend to dwell too long upon the idea of finding rest in Heaven and the sense of permanent belonging; to little upon the idea of Heaven being a person and our belonging eternally to Him.

It is only the most superficial singularities in a persons service of God that represent the desire to overplay a part. The real singularities that represent a real part are those that spring from an untamed spiritual yearning. These if not corrected can lead to false mysticism, heresy, presumption, and despair. It is a serious as that. 

The argument for substantiation of the above is, is simply this: nothing so promotes self deception as undisciplined desire.  The appetites can create a sense of urgency and a sense of reality that are quite untrue. Giving himself a liberty to which he has no right, the man who is self-deceived assumes and inside knowledge about all the things that normally call for faith.

It is not that such a man is possessed of insufficient faith. In a sense he is possessed of too much. He believes where there are no grounds for belief, he has substituted faith in himself for Faith in God.

It is not that such a man pays to little attention to the inner voice that tells him what to do. In a sense, he pays too much attention to it - and hears it entirely wrong. He listens only for his own inspiration, not for God's.

Nobody can tell such a man that he is deluded; he knows that the saints have had to endure the same charge. Authority itself may oppose him; but he is ready for that too. "In the company of the Saints and Mystics" he says "I am not subject to ordinary legislation". It is simply, he tells himself sadly, that these material people who criticize him do not understand the ways of the spirit.

There is nobody so well-entrenched or who can take such risks within his entrenchment as the martyred soul. Where the opinions of others might have inhibited him before, now it seems to uninhibit him. Stimulated by the conception of being one lonely voice raised against the majority opinion, the false apostle of spirituality rises majestically above the clamour.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

 + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...

News Roundup: April 30, 2026

 + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

 + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...