Skip to main content

Emerging from the Crisis - One Catholic At A Time: How to Find God ... and Discover Your True Self in the Process

+
JMJ

It is clear that the Catholic Church will not emerge from the crisis because we simply want and pray for it to happen.

We need to start with ourselves.

My wife is reading a book on Catholic Spirituality written by Dom Hubert Van Zeller in 1957. She compared this gem to her understanding of the spirituality of Archbishop Lefebvre.

While tempted to compare the behaviour of Pope Francis and others to the principles that I have quoted below - we need to honestly compare our own perspective and extract the beam out of our own eye first.

P^3


How To Find God ... and Discover Your True Self in the Process available from Sophia Press.



You must run after spiritual heroism

Almost every excess in the spiritual life, then, can be traced to a desire for God that will not wait, to homesickness for a home that we have never been to, but of which we know enough to realize that we shall never be happy anywhere else. God spells for us security, rest, and belonging. 

If we thought of God more in the terms of what He has revealed about Himself and less in terms of what we shall feel when we have found Him, we would be less liable to error in our approach. We tend to dwell too long upon the idea of finding rest in Heaven and the sense of permanent belonging; to little upon the idea of Heaven being a person and our belonging eternally to Him.

It is only the most superficial singularities in a persons service of God that represent the desire to overplay a part. The real singularities that represent a real part are those that spring from an untamed spiritual yearning. These if not corrected can lead to false mysticism, heresy, presumption, and despair. It is a serious as that. 

The argument for substantiation of the above is, is simply this: nothing so promotes self deception as undisciplined desire.  The appetites can create a sense of urgency and a sense of reality that are quite untrue. Giving himself a liberty to which he has no right, the man who is self-deceived assumes and inside knowledge about all the things that normally call for faith.

It is not that such a man is possessed of insufficient faith. In a sense he is possessed of too much. He believes where there are no grounds for belief, he has substituted faith in himself for Faith in God.

It is not that such a man pays to little attention to the inner voice that tells him what to do. In a sense, he pays too much attention to it - and hears it entirely wrong. He listens only for his own inspiration, not for God's.

Nobody can tell such a man that he is deluded; he knows that the saints have had to endure the same charge. Authority itself may oppose him; but he is ready for that too. "In the company of the Saints and Mystics" he says "I am not subject to ordinary legislation". It is simply, he tells himself sadly, that these material people who criticize him do not understand the ways of the spirit.

There is nobody so well-entrenched or who can take such risks within his entrenchment as the martyred soul. Where the opinions of others might have inhibited him before, now it seems to uninhibit him. Stimulated by the conception of being one lonely voice raised against the majority opinion, the false apostle of spirituality rises majestically above the clamour.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX Transfers

+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...