Skip to main content

Pope Francis is neither the cause nor the cure for the crisis of the Church - He is merely a symptom

+
JMJ

Pope Francis definitely has Catholics and non-Catholics alike shaking their heads.  One can pick just about any statement to find some more mind-bending modernism.

I've noticed bloggers who are normally calm are ... for lack of a better word ... exploding with anger and frustration at the antics of the current occupant of the See of Peter.



On the flipside, others of the 'Pope can do no wrong' ilk such as Jeff Mirus take the following approach:
Unfortunately, at a certain point, our serious concern about Pope Francis can become a preoccupation—an unhealthy preoccupation. We can become so tied in knots that we feel as if we cannot get on with our lives, and especially with what God calls us personally to do, until the “Francis problem” is settled. But such a preoccupation serves no good purpose. In fact, it is a dreadful temptation. Satan desires nothing more than for us to become so engrossed by what we frequently perceive as the Pope’s recklessness that we forget our own vocations, our own Catholic mission, our own apostolates. Catholic Culture - Jeff Mirus
He goes on to basically say:


I believe this is a wrong approach to take, the Church should react to a Pope that is off the rails. This is basically what the laity have been doing since the Second Vatican Council (pray, pay and obey). That hasn't worked for 50 years - why would it work now???

It won't.

Another track being trod is that of Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix, rest assured that they are on the same path, just Gerry has progressed much further than Louie.

Simply put they say that:


This likewise is an overly simple 'solution' to a problem that actually creates more problems.  For example, what if Pope Francis actually issued a licit binding order?  Those that say he is not longer Pope (or never was) would not obey.  This is only the tip of the ice-berg of theological issues with deviating from Church Doctrine.

In short, just because Pope Francis disregards Church Doctrine, it doesn't give Catholics (Traditional and non-Trad alike) license to do the same.

We just have to accept that Catholics have infallible assurance that Pope Francis was licitly elected as the Vicar of Christ (see Dogmatic Facts).

So,  while a Catholic may suspect that the Pope has abandoned the faith, they actually can't act on that suspicion. They still have to regard the See of Peter as being occupied until the authority of the Church makes it clear.

There is something that seems to be lost on a lot of people.  Namely, Pope Francis' potential.


The potential of Pope Francis is actually huge. He just doesn't seem to care what other people think and does what he likes.

If he were to work with the Grace of God, like St. Paul, it is reasonable to assume that he would proceed to act as a paragon of orthodoxy.

At this point the cynics are probably 'tsk tsking'. 

That is the problem with some Trads - they understand neither the history of the Church nor the possibility of conversions.  They see this crisis with the eyes of the modernists - just from the flip side of the coin.

We have to understand that Pope Francis is neither the cause nor the cure for the crisis of the Church - he is merely a symptom.  He is the logical result of the conflict that has been raging in the Church since the time of Pope Pius IX.

History: Pope Pius IX was elected as the liberal candidate and acted accordingly until the mobs was pounding on the door to with a desire to drag his dead body through the streets of Rome.

After that, like St. Paul, he changed his direction.

The same can happen to Pope Francis and as a faithful Catholic, we have an obligation to pray for the Pope.

Here's a traditional prayer for the Pope.  Say it and weep, then say it again:

Prayer for the Pope

V. Let us pray for our Pontiff Francis.


R. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and make him blessed upon the earth, and deliver him not up to the will of his enemies.

Let us pray.
O God, Shepherd and Ruler of all Thy faithful, look mercifully upon Thy servant Francis, whom Thou hast chosen as shepherd to preside over Thy Church: grant him, we beseech Thee, that, by word and example, he may edify those over whom he hath charge, so that together with the flock committed to him, he may attain everlasting life. Through Christ, our Lord. Amen. 

Pray for the Pope - that's one way we can emerge from this crisis.

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...

Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum

 + JMJ  Now THIS is probably the most important news item in the last two years - yes I place this above the pandemic. I'm only surprised by how long it took for this to surface during this pontificate. I hope and pray that it is false or that if it comes to pass that somehow some good will arise out of the ashes of Summorum Pontificum. P^3  Courtesy of Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum (Updated) Update (May 26): Rorate's additional sources in Rome have confirmed this Wednesday that Francis has indeed a text on Summorum Pontificum lined up, which has been developed for months, but what is not known at this point is if the text is just about a more limited take on the Summorum application questionnaire (first revealed by us in the spring of 2020) or about an overhaul of Summorum Pontificum in general: drafts could be dealing with both matters. It is also not impossible for a text to come ou...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.