Skip to main content

Pope Francis is neither the cause nor the cure for the crisis of the Church - He is merely a symptom

+
JMJ

Pope Francis definitely has Catholics and non-Catholics alike shaking their heads.  One can pick just about any statement to find some more mind-bending modernism.

I've noticed bloggers who are normally calm are ... for lack of a better word ... exploding with anger and frustration at the antics of the current occupant of the See of Peter.



On the flipside, others of the 'Pope can do no wrong' ilk such as Jeff Mirus take the following approach:
Unfortunately, at a certain point, our serious concern about Pope Francis can become a preoccupation—an unhealthy preoccupation. We can become so tied in knots that we feel as if we cannot get on with our lives, and especially with what God calls us personally to do, until the “Francis problem” is settled. But such a preoccupation serves no good purpose. In fact, it is a dreadful temptation. Satan desires nothing more than for us to become so engrossed by what we frequently perceive as the Pope’s recklessness that we forget our own vocations, our own Catholic mission, our own apostolates. Catholic Culture - Jeff Mirus
He goes on to basically say:


I believe this is a wrong approach to take, the Church should react to a Pope that is off the rails. This is basically what the laity have been doing since the Second Vatican Council (pray, pay and obey). That hasn't worked for 50 years - why would it work now???

It won't.

Another track being trod is that of Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix, rest assured that they are on the same path, just Gerry has progressed much further than Louie.

Simply put they say that:


This likewise is an overly simple 'solution' to a problem that actually creates more problems.  For example, what if Pope Francis actually issued a licit binding order?  Those that say he is not longer Pope (or never was) would not obey.  This is only the tip of the ice-berg of theological issues with deviating from Church Doctrine.

In short, just because Pope Francis disregards Church Doctrine, it doesn't give Catholics (Traditional and non-Trad alike) license to do the same.

We just have to accept that Catholics have infallible assurance that Pope Francis was licitly elected as the Vicar of Christ (see Dogmatic Facts).

So,  while a Catholic may suspect that the Pope has abandoned the faith, they actually can't act on that suspicion. They still have to regard the See of Peter as being occupied until the authority of the Church makes it clear.

There is something that seems to be lost on a lot of people.  Namely, Pope Francis' potential.


The potential of Pope Francis is actually huge. He just doesn't seem to care what other people think and does what he likes.

If he were to work with the Grace of God, like St. Paul, it is reasonable to assume that he would proceed to act as a paragon of orthodoxy.

At this point the cynics are probably 'tsk tsking'. 

That is the problem with some Trads - they understand neither the history of the Church nor the possibility of conversions.  They see this crisis with the eyes of the modernists - just from the flip side of the coin.

We have to understand that Pope Francis is neither the cause nor the cure for the crisis of the Church - he is merely a symptom.  He is the logical result of the conflict that has been raging in the Church since the time of Pope Pius IX.

History: Pope Pius IX was elected as the liberal candidate and acted accordingly until the mobs was pounding on the door to with a desire to drag his dead body through the streets of Rome.

After that, like St. Paul, he changed his direction.

The same can happen to Pope Francis and as a faithful Catholic, we have an obligation to pray for the Pope.

Here's a traditional prayer for the Pope.  Say it and weep, then say it again:

Prayer for the Pope

V. Let us pray for our Pontiff Francis.


R. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and make him blessed upon the earth, and deliver him not up to the will of his enemies.

Let us pray.
O God, Shepherd and Ruler of all Thy faithful, look mercifully upon Thy servant Francis, whom Thou hast chosen as shepherd to preside over Thy Church: grant him, we beseech Thee, that, by word and example, he may edify those over whom he hath charge, so that together with the flock committed to him, he may attain everlasting life. Through Christ, our Lord. Amen. 

Pray for the Pope - that's one way we can emerge from this crisis.

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX Transfers

+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...