Skip to main content

Pope Francis is neither the cause nor the cure for the crisis of the Church - He is merely a symptom

+
JMJ

Pope Francis definitely has Catholics and non-Catholics alike shaking their heads.  One can pick just about any statement to find some more mind-bending modernism.

I've noticed bloggers who are normally calm are ... for lack of a better word ... exploding with anger and frustration at the antics of the current occupant of the See of Peter.



On the flipside, others of the 'Pope can do no wrong' ilk such as Jeff Mirus take the following approach:
Unfortunately, at a certain point, our serious concern about Pope Francis can become a preoccupation—an unhealthy preoccupation. We can become so tied in knots that we feel as if we cannot get on with our lives, and especially with what God calls us personally to do, until the “Francis problem” is settled. But such a preoccupation serves no good purpose. In fact, it is a dreadful temptation. Satan desires nothing more than for us to become so engrossed by what we frequently perceive as the Pope’s recklessness that we forget our own vocations, our own Catholic mission, our own apostolates. Catholic Culture - Jeff Mirus
He goes on to basically say:


I believe this is a wrong approach to take, the Church should react to a Pope that is off the rails. This is basically what the laity have been doing since the Second Vatican Council (pray, pay and obey). That hasn't worked for 50 years - why would it work now???

It won't.

Another track being trod is that of Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix, rest assured that they are on the same path, just Gerry has progressed much further than Louie.

Simply put they say that:


This likewise is an overly simple 'solution' to a problem that actually creates more problems.  For example, what if Pope Francis actually issued a licit binding order?  Those that say he is not longer Pope (or never was) would not obey.  This is only the tip of the ice-berg of theological issues with deviating from Church Doctrine.

In short, just because Pope Francis disregards Church Doctrine, it doesn't give Catholics (Traditional and non-Trad alike) license to do the same.

We just have to accept that Catholics have infallible assurance that Pope Francis was licitly elected as the Vicar of Christ (see Dogmatic Facts).

So,  while a Catholic may suspect that the Pope has abandoned the faith, they actually can't act on that suspicion. They still have to regard the See of Peter as being occupied until the authority of the Church makes it clear.

There is something that seems to be lost on a lot of people.  Namely, Pope Francis' potential.


The potential of Pope Francis is actually huge. He just doesn't seem to care what other people think and does what he likes.

If he were to work with the Grace of God, like St. Paul, it is reasonable to assume that he would proceed to act as a paragon of orthodoxy.

At this point the cynics are probably 'tsk tsking'. 

That is the problem with some Trads - they understand neither the history of the Church nor the possibility of conversions.  They see this crisis with the eyes of the modernists - just from the flip side of the coin.

We have to understand that Pope Francis is neither the cause nor the cure for the crisis of the Church - he is merely a symptom.  He is the logical result of the conflict that has been raging in the Church since the time of Pope Pius IX.

History: Pope Pius IX was elected as the liberal candidate and acted accordingly until the mobs was pounding on the door to with a desire to drag his dead body through the streets of Rome.

After that, like St. Paul, he changed his direction.

The same can happen to Pope Francis and as a faithful Catholic, we have an obligation to pray for the Pope.

Here's a traditional prayer for the Pope.  Say it and weep, then say it again:

Prayer for the Pope

V. Let us pray for our Pontiff Francis.


R. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and make him blessed upon the earth, and deliver him not up to the will of his enemies.

Let us pray.
O God, Shepherd and Ruler of all Thy faithful, look mercifully upon Thy servant Francis, whom Thou hast chosen as shepherd to preside over Thy Church: grant him, we beseech Thee, that, by word and example, he may edify those over whom he hath charge, so that together with the flock committed to him, he may attain everlasting life. Through Christ, our Lord. Amen. 

Pray for the Pope - that's one way we can emerge from this crisis.

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...

De Fide Teachings of the Catholic Church (Updated)

+ JMJ  Update: I was reviewing Ott's work directly and noted that some of the Teachings are De Fide while others are different levels of authority (such as Sent Certa etc).  So please refer to Ott for the actual classification). Posts Listing the Dogmas of the Catholic Church Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader (Oct 2022) Updated List of Teachings of the Catholic Church (Oct 2021) *** Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (Oct 2015) De Fide teaching of the Catholic Church (Apr 2013)           *** Latest version