Skip to main content

Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, The Mary Victrix Blog and "More Crypto-Lefebvrism from Rorate Caeli"

Image
By
+
JMJ


Fr. Greiger (FI) over at Mary Victrix blog has demonstrated a behaviour that is indicative of the problem within the Church.

He banned me, because I hold an opinion at variance with his own.

Since I was banned, I emailed my response directly to Father and reproduced it below in order to respond to the banning publicly.

In the Church there is plenty of room for various opinions on giving Communion to Divorcee's that are living in a public state of sin, evolution of dogma, Same-Sex Marriage, etc.

There is, however, no room for anything approaching the opinion of the SSPX regarding the Novus Ordo Missae, the Second Vatican Council and the reforms issuing thereof.

Why is this important?

Because Fr. Greiger represents a sample of a set of cultural assumptions.

I represent a sample of the cultural assumptions held by the SSPX and others that are similar to them (FSSP, ICK, IBP).

His response to me is indicative of what happens in the Church as a whole when these two cultures 'collide' within the Church.

A banning.

The message that Fr. Greiger has transmitted is the same message that is transmitted to anyone who dares to question some of the liberal aspects of the Second Vatican Council (ie Ecumenism of Recognition, Religious Liberty, Collegiality, The Church).

Cross any of the lines and the reaction is immediate and sometimes irrational or even violent.

... and completely consistent with Cognitive Dissonance theory.


Fr. Greiger, has a set a cognitive models by which he perceives and assesses the world and actions of the people therein.

This is not unique to Fr, everyone has these interpretative models,  without them we'd be paralysed.

I admist that I have not done extensive research on Fr.'s blog, time does not allow a thourough investigation.  However, here's what I have concluded from this recent exchange by applying the model.


  1. Creation of Inconsistency
    1. Belief: A religious obeys his/her superiors in all things excepting sin
    2. Action: Appealed to Rome in order to not obey his superiors
  2. Resulting Dissonance: The reason for the dissonance is that by refusing to submit to the judgement of his superiors and appealing to Rome he has violated the principle of obedience.
  3. Dissonance Reducing Options
    1. Change Belief: This is the first option and in this context would require changing the belief that he was bound by obedience.  Given that the Franciscans take the three vows of poverty, chastity and obedience changing this belief is not really an option.
    2. Change Action: Unfortunately, this is not an option as the action has been done and the past is unalterable.  There is the possibility of admitting that the belief/action interchange that created the inconsistency is a violation of the belief but that would still leave the actor with the need to relieve the dissonance by trying to undo the action.
    3. Change Perception of Action: This option is chosen by most people as it is the easiest, and quickest way to achive the goal of reducing dissonance. This also appears to be the one that Fr. Greiger has chosen.  His action has been transformed into an act of obedience to a 'higher' authority, which he prompted into action. 
  4. The resulting change in the perception of the action has lessoned the dissonance that he experienced.
The model is not absolute and given a sufficiently strong confirmation bias anyone can make an excuse for inconsistent behavior.  

When a person goes against the judgement a superior, they are objectively disobedient. 

This is where Fr. Greiger has walked the same path taken by Archbishop Lefebvre.  

From my perspective Archbishop Lefebvre understood that there was a contradiction between the beliefs of the Catholic Church and the actions undertaken after the Council (ie Ecumenism - Assisi etc) and this created a dissonance.  

He was faced with the same three choices.  

However, in the case of Archbishop Lefebvre he did not attempt to change the perception of the action, nor did he change his belief.  Both of these were in the realm of objective truth and cannot be altered without serious repercussions. Therefore, to reduce the 'dissonance' he undertook to counter or undo the action performed by others. When unable to effect the change Archbishop endured the 'dissonance' that was created by others and refused to change any of the other elements in the model.

Focusing on the key act of disobedience of 1988 made by Archbishop Lefebvre.  

  1. Creation of Inconsistency
    1. Belief: A religious obeys his/her superiors in all things excepting sin
    2. Action: Disobeyed order of his superior (St. Pope John Paul II) because he believed that it would sinful to not proceed due to the danger to the Faith as noted above.
  2. Resulting Dissonance: Because his actions are consistent with the principle of obedience, there was no dissonance created.  Eyewitness accounts support this conclusion.
As far as I can see this is the key difference between the disobedience of Archbishop Lefebvre and that of Fr. Greiger: The adherence to principles, their application and the patience to endure the dissonance created by others.

There is only one person who can provide us with further insight: Fr. Greiger.

The combox is open Fr. Greiger if you care to provide further insight to the application of the model.

Tradical

P^3
Prayer
Penance
Patience



+JMJ+

Dear Father,

February: Oh sorry seemed like a long time ago.

pseudonym: Tradical is what I started out with years ago and as you have my email (which I didn't conceal) there was no intent to deceive - as you seem to believe.

I wouldn't bother with the 'ip' blocking as my ISP uses DHCP to ration out their IP address. As a consequence - unless you block out the root IP (an entire domain) that isn't a good option as within a few weeks my ISP will do the automatically refresh my IP address.

With respect to the "free amateur psychoanalyses".

I work with project teams, have studied the area of organizational culture as part of my under-grad and have put these techniques / knowledge to good use in understanding human interactions and conflict.

I have also used them in my interactions with other Catholics who hold similar, if not identical, opinions as yourself.

With respect to my blog etc - that is irrelevant to the conversation.  That I have opinions at variance with yours is obvious.

That these opinions cause you sufficient 'dissonance' is likewise obvious as your response is ... well sarcasm, a quotation for C.S. Lewis and a banning.

Even your attempts to justify your actions bely some of your cultural assumptions.

Thank you for your replies, they have been enlightening.

In Jesus, Mary and Joseph,

Tradical 
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 28, 2014 at 3:38 PM

    As someone often the target of Fr Judas, all I can say is, let him ban you! He's doing you a favor. The less you focus your tine trying to figure out how a priest becomes evil the better you will spend your time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TradicalJune 28, 2014 at 10:48 PM

      I understand your frustration and that of other traditionalists who have engaged in discussion with non or even anti-trads.

      It was through many hours of face-to-face discussions that I learned that patience is required because for some of the non-trads the simple presence of a trad causes an up roar. Sometimes it is dispersed with a simple prayer to St. Michael, others it just takes patience to endure the accusations and reaffirm Church Teaching.

      I gave a talk on EENS to a non-trad Catholic men's meeting. A Jesuit was there and we engaged in a fruitful debate and the truth was accepted. Not my truth, but that of the Church. Patience won out for a few minutes, then a number of them set upon me (verbally). The funniest thing happened during the arguing, a man who accompanied the Jesuit stood forth and aided me because he was able to see things from my perspective. Patience calms people and gives grace a chance.

      As the chastisement of the FFI provides insight to the motivations of those involved, I plan on keeping an eye on the developments because it provides a thermometer of the crisis. To use an analogy, the patient now has a virally induced fever, when it reaches its peak it will suddenly break.

      Anyway, I've gotten too preachy. I have another article coming up on this topic, it should be posted on the 30th.

      P^3
      Prayer
      Penance
      Patience

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

By
 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

By
 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

By
 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

By
 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...
Post a Comment
Read more

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

By
 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...
10 comments
Read more